I was in a heated dabate with one of my freinds at school and I wanted to prove to him that cod: 4 was the better shooter oh and I would like a reason why too
Once you can give a reason other than aesthetics, than you can tell me its better. However, for now its just your opinion.Shapsters said:CoD4 vastly better! Why!? Because
1. They are basically the same game, but 4 came out earlier,
2. WaW is set in WWII, MW has cool modern weapons and a new idea.
3. Its just.. better ok.
Thank you Mr. Obvious.RavingPenguin said:Once you can give a reason other than aesthetics, than you can tell me its better. However, for now its just your opinion.Shapsters said:CoD4 vastly better! Why!? Because
1. They are basically the same game, but 4 came out earlier,
2. WaW is set in WWII, MW has cool modern weapons and a new idea.
3. Its just.. better ok.
No need to get snippy, geez.ansem1532 said:Thank you Mr. Obvious.RavingPenguin said:Once you can give a reason other than aesthetics, than you can tell me its better. However, for now its just your opinion.Shapsters said:CoD4 vastly better! Why!? Because
1. They are basically the same game, but 4 came out earlier,
2. WaW is set in WWII, MW has cool modern weapons and a new idea.
3. Its just.. better ok.
Because we all know everyone bring facts and statements not influenced by opinions to a versus thread.
And that's why your opinion for this is not valid. Play both, then come back.0p3rati0n said:World at War.... I just find Modern Warfare a pathetic excuse to get away from WWII. I'll agree Modern Warfare looks cool (never played it yet). But WWII guns are cooler! Thirdly because I said so![]()
I've some of the levels and they're quite nice. But I've grown up with CoD as a WWII shooter. Also I'm really into WWII. So Modern Warfare doesn't all to really appeal to me. So there! Also I might be getting it any despite my thoughts about it!orannis62 said:And that's why your opinion for this is not valid. Play both, then come back.0p3rati0n said:World at War.... I just find Modern Warfare a pathetic excuse to get away from WWII. I'll agree Modern Warfare looks cool (never played it yet). But WWII guns are cooler! Thirdly because I said so![]()
Wait what?Spirultima said:Do you need this thread? Seriously?
People who game as about 3 hours a week will say CoD WAW, its the hardcore gamers who will say CoD MW.
Now to hit the final nail in, The Escapist is full of hardcore gamers.
You do the math.
That's understandable. Truth be told, I felt the same way until I actually got Cod4. It has to be experienced, you know?0p3rati0n said:I've some of the levels and they're quite nice. But I've grown up with CoD as a WWII shooter. Also I'm really into WWII. So Modern Warfare doesn't all to really appeal to me. So there! Also I might be getting it any despite my thoughts about it!orannis62 said:And that's why your opinion for this is not valid. Play both, then come back.0p3rati0n said:World at War.... I just find Modern Warfare a pathetic excuse to get away from WWII. I'll agree Modern Warfare looks cool (never played it yet). But WWII guns are cooler! Thirdly because I said so![]()