Sooooo, I have recently seen a rise in discussion (internet cesspooling and maybe one news story) about the supposed problem of manspreading creating a crisis (hyperbole) of seating availability on public transports. Whenever this topic is brought up I constantly see people claiming that it is physiologically impossible for a man to not spread his legs lest he either crush his junk or ride them up his thighs, causing them to create a bulge in his pants. Leaving him open to sexual harassment. I have seen this argument raised time and time again with almost no alteration. This makes me believe that it is a snowclone argument, possibly a quote from a popular blogger/podcaster.
Furthermore, I have heard that the term is sexist as it excludes female spreaders from the argument but, from my personal observations, the most vocal pro manspreaders base almost all of their arguments upon the male physiology necessitating it. Soooo, does that make it a sexist term, I do not know.
I am asking because there does not seem to actually be any decent studies upon this phenomenon (that I can find) and it all appears to be hearsay at this point. Is it even a problem at all? I know personally that if I wanted a seat on a full bus and someone was consuming more than one without any evident need, I would be very hesitant to bother them. As a man with, ahem, normal assets I was not able to cause myself any discomfort by closing my legs together. Nor was I able to create any noticeable differences in the crotch of my pants while wearing jeans.
At the same time I have freaking enormous thighs as a powerlifter so I do not how that factors in, if at all.
So let me know what you think, share any studies (if there are even any), and let me know of your own experiences. I have tried my best to be as neutral as possible but I just know that this is going to get ugly fast but my acknowledging it is not an invitation for such, far from it. For the love of God, at least try to be decent.
P.S. If popular consensus reads that the term is sexist, what term would you use instead of manspread? Would it be more prudent to simply use different terms for men and women?
Furthermore, I have heard that the term is sexist as it excludes female spreaders from the argument but, from my personal observations, the most vocal pro manspreaders base almost all of their arguments upon the male physiology necessitating it. Soooo, does that make it a sexist term, I do not know.
I am asking because there does not seem to actually be any decent studies upon this phenomenon (that I can find) and it all appears to be hearsay at this point. Is it even a problem at all? I know personally that if I wanted a seat on a full bus and someone was consuming more than one without any evident need, I would be very hesitant to bother them. As a man with, ahem, normal assets I was not able to cause myself any discomfort by closing my legs together. Nor was I able to create any noticeable differences in the crotch of my pants while wearing jeans.
At the same time I have freaking enormous thighs as a powerlifter so I do not how that factors in, if at all.
So let me know what you think, share any studies (if there are even any), and let me know of your own experiences. I have tried my best to be as neutral as possible but I just know that this is going to get ugly fast but my acknowledging it is not an invitation for such, far from it. For the love of God, at least try to be decent.
P.S. If popular consensus reads that the term is sexist, what term would you use instead of manspread? Would it be more prudent to simply use different terms for men and women?