Poll: Gears of War 2 Review (Go to igetpwned.blogspot.com for more semi-hilarious reviews)

Recommended Videos

soaringbiscuit

New member
Apr 25, 2009
246
0
0
GRAGGGGHHHHH!!! AAAAGHHH!!!!! WAGGGUUHHHHAAGGHHHUGGGGGG!!!!! No, these are not the cries of the Locust Horde you face in Gears of War 2. These are the cries of the guys fighting the horde. These shouts come from the effects of chugging a 2-liter soda bottle full of liquid testosterone with every meal. These two guys, Marcus and Dom, literally mow down hundreds of Locusts with their spit, which has been charged with liquid lightning and many katanas, as well as the required 5 grams of solid testosterone dust; blow up entire mountains with a single curb-stomp, and destroy seven-mile long worms by shooting convenientely placed major arteries a few times. It's up to these two guys to single-handedly eliminate the entire Locust Horde with no help from their superiors. I actually began to suspect that those guys giving the orders didn't actually have an army, and the President just told the guy in charge to pump up two MORONS on enough testosterone to convert the whole female population to Duke Nukem look-alikes and send them on a misison to kill everything. Immediately after I entered this place, I discovered Locust buildings, don't exist. Rather, they just built about a thousand chest-high walls very convenient for cover, along a freeway so barren it might as well be Route 66 leading straight to their Queen. It strikes me as odd that these Locusts would purposely set up a bunch of shields for the guy who's killing them all to hide behind. If they were smart, they'd draw faces on them. The testosterone would make it hard to tell the difference between the barrier and the Locusts. There are a whopping four guns to choose from, including the Shotgun, the Battle Rifle, some stupid Pistol, and, of course, the Lancer. In multiplayer, though, people seem to forget that yes, there is a gun on that chainsaw. When faced with an enemy firing rounds into your skull, it seems all the testosterone tells you to do is run straight at those bullets, brandishing a chainsaw, and try to put it straight through the guy. The sad thing is that most of the time, it works. The "story" consists of three main plot points. 1. Consume as much tesosterone (I'm getting really tired of typing that word) as possible. 2. Go pwn some scrubs. 3. There's no third step! There's also a few levels that puzzled me. In one of them, you pull up to a random insane hospital in a Volkswagen van like you're Scooby-Doo in ludicrously heavy combat armor, and wander around for 40 minutes listening to Tom Cruise talk about Scientology and his master plan. Then you're teleported back to Apocalypse City and you pwn some more scrubs. My final thoughts about the story is that it might have been good until someone shuffled all the chapters around. The tutorial level is like, halfway through the game!

Summary: I might compare this game to a 5 Hour Energy Drink, but I can't. For while they share the same amount of testosterone, 5 Hour doesn't give you a crash, and Gears of War does. After you finish the campaign, the only thing left is multiplayer, and Jesus is over there too as everyone's favorite quickly rotating blade power tool, the Chainsaw. It just left me sore and wanting a refund, at least for the Tom Cruise part.

The Good: Will turn you into a hairy wolverine starved for blood.
The Bad: WAUGH! (If you're a girl, the above could be counted as a bad)
The Despicable: They actually try to make the Dom guy care about his wife in the story.
 

Blights

New member
Feb 16, 2009
899
0
0
I cant say I liked it, it didnt explain anything.

Nothing about combat, the guns or anything. You are critisizing the characters and the story.
 

Cpt_Oblivious

Not Dead Yet
Jan 7, 2009
6,933
0
0
Psychosocial said:
Cpt_Oblivious said:
Why is "I don't have the game" a Poll option?
That has no bearing on how well you can review.
Maybe he thinks people judge a review based on if it follows his opinion?

Since an opinion can only be formed by playing the game.. Yeah, you get it.
Well the review is his opinion. Me having the game and/or an opinion has nothing to do with him and his opinion.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
Psychosocial said:
Cpt_Oblivious said:
Why is "I don't have the game" a Poll option?
That has no bearing on how well you can review.
Maybe he thinks people judge a review based on if it follows his opinion?

Since an opinion can only be formed by playing the game.. Yeah, you get it.
But part of a review should always been aimed at those who have not played it- as a review is meant to explain your opinions on said game and if you should buy it.

This is an unfunny, unoriginal and flat out poor review - there are too many things wrong with it for me to go into detail but the biggest of all is the fact theres no paragraphs.
 

Cpt_Oblivious

Not Dead Yet
Jan 7, 2009
6,933
0
0
Ok, I've decided to read it. It's poor.
You go into little if any detail on many aspects of the game, instead choosing to imitate Yahtzee with ludicrous descriptions of characters.
You also have no paragraph structure which puts me off reading it or anything else you produce

Oh and your Poll options are rather stupid. You only give us the opinion to say your review is funny or bad. The other options don't belong on a review. Ever.

Oh, and what's a locust?
For we who haven't played this game, it'd be nice seeing as you use the term in your first sentence without explanation.
 

MrBrightside919

New member
Oct 2, 2008
1,625
0
0
Gears of War 2 did have a pretty poor story and the way they try to characterize their characters was awful (WHERES MY WIFE THAT I NEVER BOTHERED TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT UNTIL THIS VERY MOMENT?!?!?!). It just seemed like fodder for the developers to put the players in weird environments like the inside of the giant worm thing or defending huge tank things from the locust armada.

To put it bluntly, the review is poor in the sence that it explains very little about the actual game. I think everyone knew the story and characters would be bad before they even played the game.
 

soaringbiscuit

New member
Apr 25, 2009
246
0
0
Ok, well, it was terrible. I guess I have a pretty bad sense of humor too, or everyone just expected a real review. My bad.
 

soaringbiscuit

New member
Apr 25, 2009
246
0
0
Oh and whoops. It had paragraph structure when I typed it on Word, i guess the whole thing got jumbled up when I copied and pasted it.
 

soaringbiscuit

New member
Apr 25, 2009
246
0
0
Cpt_Oblivious said:
Ok, I've decided to read it. It's poor.
You go into little if any detail on many aspects of the game, instead choosing to imitate Yahtzee with ludicrous descriptions of characters.
You also have no paragraph structure which puts me off reading it or anything else you produce

Oh and your Poll options are rather stupid. You only give us the opinion to say your review is funny or bad. The other options don't belong on a review. Ever.

Oh, and what's a locust?
For we who haven't played this game, it'd be nice seeing as you use the term in your first sentence without explanation.
MrBrightside919 said:
Gears of War 2 did have a pretty poor story and the way they try to characterize their characters was awful (WHERES MY WIFE THAT I NEVER BOTHERED TO SAY ANYTHING ABOUT UNTIL THIS VERY MOMENT?!?!?!). It just seemed like fodder for the developers to put the players in weird environments like the inside of the giant worm thing or defending huge tank things from the locust armada.

To put it bluntly, the review is poor in the sence that it explains very little about the actual game. I think everyone knew the story and characters would be bad before they even played the game.
Natty DL said:
I cant say I liked it, it didnt explain anything.

Nothing about combat, the guns or anything. You are critisizing the characters and the story.
But thank you for the insults. Harsh though it was, there's nothing like a little constructive criticism. By the way, I'm new here. Is there a humor-type thread? And sorry about the poll thing, I titled it wrong, very wrong.

Thanks,
Soaring Biscuit
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
soaringbiscuit said:
I'm new here. Is there a humor-type thread?
Theres a difference between a humorous review and a pure joke thread. Joke threads are looked down upon because they arn't funny and just take up space for the genuine reviews that people spend a lot of time writing.

You can always create a "funny" review, but try and make it a good review at the same time.
 

soaringbiscuit

New member
Apr 25, 2009
246
0
0
D_987 said:
soaringbiscuit said:
I'm new here. Is there a humor-type thread?
Theres a difference between a humorous review and a pure joke thread. Joke threads are looked down upon because they arn't funny and just take up space for the genuine reviews that people spend a lot of time writing.

You can always create a "funny" review, but try and make it a good review at the same time.
Thank you. One more question. The "Gone Gonzo", "Paperboy", "Beat Writer" titles, are those akin to ranks?
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
soaringbiscuit said:
D_987 said:
soaringbiscuit said:
I'm new here. Is there a humor-type thread?
Theres a difference between a humorous review and a pure joke thread. Joke threads are looked down upon because they arn't funny and just take up space for the genuine reviews that people spend a lot of time writing.

You can always create a "funny" review, but try and make it a good review at the same time.
Thank you. One more question. The "Gone Gonzo", "Paperboy", "Beat Writer" titles, are those akin to ranks?
Nay, they are simply titles based on your post count - you may recieve special titles if you win competitons however.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
sneak_copter said:
mentor07825 said:
I find your lack of review disturbing....NOW DIE!!!

[http://photobucket.com/images/darth%20sidius]
Constructive Criticism FTW!
Neither of you are helping matters - why don't you at least comment instead of spamming to get up your post count...?