I didn't think it was a good as The Hunger Games, though there are of course many many similarities. I feel THG did a better job of sort of portraying the whole situation. While BR was definately more brutal and bloody, it didnt seem as refined or "real" as HG did.
They were both good, don't get me wrong, but I think I still like The Hunger Games more simply because they spent more time leading up to it. The whole first half of the movie was used to set the stage and it gave me more of a sense of the characters being PEOPLE and thus it was more "tragic" when they started to die. Battle Royale didn't really do that so the deaths didn't feel as impactful as I feel they could have.
I'm curious, though, if you've seen/read both books/,movies, what did you like better and why?
They were both good, don't get me wrong, but I think I still like The Hunger Games more simply because they spent more time leading up to it. The whole first half of the movie was used to set the stage and it gave me more of a sense of the characters being PEOPLE and thus it was more "tragic" when they started to die. Battle Royale didn't really do that so the deaths didn't feel as impactful as I feel they could have.
I'm curious, though, if you've seen/read both books/,movies, what did you like better and why?