A cheap and cheerful question for you all: Indiana Jones has a fight with James Bond, who would win? If you're wondering which Bond actor, go with Connery I guess, everyone seems to like him the best.
Poll: Indiana Jones vs James Bond
- Thread starter evilengine
- Start date
Recommended Videos
EVERYBODY LIKES CONNERY THE BEST?! Shame on you, what about Lazenby?!
Ok, I was half joking, but I voted Bond, because judging from "The Living Daylights" he could just snipe Indy from a rooftop without anyone noticing.
Ok, I was half joking, but I voted Bond, because judging from "The Living Daylights" he could just snipe Indy from a rooftop without anyone noticing.
Bond every time. He'd hide some sort brain exploding device in some treasure. Indiana can't resist treasure. MUST HAVE TREASURE!
Completely off topic, but what's that in your avatar? I think it's something from a game I saw a screencap of maybe 6-7 years ago, and since then I've never known what it was. I might be completely wrong, though.evilengine said:
OT: After Casino Royale, I have to go with Bond.
Let's see. The trained secret agent, licensed to kill with an arsenal of gadgets, or a professor of archaeology with a whip, a hat, and a six-shooter?
I know where my money's going
I know where my money's going
My avi's from 'The Neverhood'. An awesome claymation puzzle game by Doug Tenapel (same guy as Earthworm Jim).Phlakes said:
Why are they fighting? That seems stupid.
Instead they should work together, fighting international terrorist/historians who plan to dominate the world's electricity by using an ancient Aztec tablet to summon the thunder Gods of old!
Instead they should work together, fighting international terrorist/historians who plan to dominate the world's electricity by using an ancient Aztec tablet to summon the thunder Gods of old!
I always see it as the well trained, but poncy, upperclass drunk (let's not forget how much Bond drinks) vs the rough, down-to-earth guy who always fights dirty (biting and throwing sand in your face).Cap said:
I'm British, so in the interests of patriotism I shall have to go with 007. That, and the fact that Bond is evidently an immortal supernatural entity, judging from his ability to change appearance, age, voice etc. at will without anybody he knows commenting on that fact. Either that or he's from Gallifrey.
In a bare, Fist-on-Fist fight between the two, no gadgets or guns involved?
My money is With Indy on this one. 007 may have training, but Indy also has experience, and the fact that he played Punch-out with a guy the looked like Brock Lesner's bigger german cousin.
With gadgets?
Unfair advantage.
EDIT: The above is also true.
My money is With Indy on this one. 007 may have training, but Indy also has experience, and the fact that he played Punch-out with a guy the looked like Brock Lesner's bigger german cousin.
With gadgets?
Unfair advantage.
EDIT: The above is also true.
Double-post apology powers, activate!!!Suicidejim said:
I like the idea that James Bond is just a code-name, which explains why each incarnation is different in attitude and physique.
I read about that too, on Cracked.com I think it was. To be honest I shouldn't have used the film version of Bond, I should have gone with him in the novels. Though I doubt many people will have read many, if any, so I went a little lowbrow, for want of a word.The-Epicly-Named-Man said:
I got it off Cracked as well I think. But yeah, I see where you were coming from.evilengine said:
I'd rather see Henry Jones, Sr. versus Connery era James Bond.
If I owned the James Bond franchise I'd so make him a Time Lord.Suicidejim said: