Poll: Jazzy!

Recommended Videos

goofiegirl2002

New member
Feb 21, 2009
154
0
0
It dawned on me the other day that Jazz music is not as popular as it once was. But I want peoples opinions whether or not jazz is a dying breed. If you do listen to jazz, I'd love to know who is your favorite musician, and any other opinions on the matter!
 

A Weary Exile

New member
Aug 24, 2009
3,784
0
0
I like Louis Armstrong and Django Reinhardt and yes Jazz is a dying breed, most people won't listen to music unless it's 'Hardcore' At least my friend's won't.
 

Sulu

New member
Jul 7, 2009
438
0
0
Jazz was niche when it was invented. It is about as niche as opera nowadays.
 

Kollega

New member
Jun 5, 2009
5,161
0
0
You know,classical music is not that popular among teenagers either. It does not mean no-one listens to it. So no.
 

Kif

New member
Jun 2, 2009
692
0
0
It has certainly declined in popularity. You only have to look at the streets of New Orleans to see there are a lot less jazz clubs (even before the natural disaster) than there were during its peak... but dying; no.

As the chap/chappette above me said.

Kollega said:
You know,classical music is not that popular among teenagers either. It does not mean no-one listens to it. So no.
 

Woem

New member
May 28, 2009
2,878
0
0
At least among this community it appears to be so: Jazz music enthusiasts [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/view/Jazz-music-enthusiasts].

Founded: 6 Oct 2009
Members: 2
 

Nincompoop

New member
May 24, 2009
1,035
0
0
Setting music into genres is one of the worst things that have happened to music.

I can like a rock song as well as a jazz or a classical piece. Genres often just tell you which instruments are used, which sounds and effects are used and maybe if there are singers or not (With exceptions of course). This is stupid. If you happen to like a piano piece, and someone were to play the exact same on a guitar with distortion, you would still like it. You might, however, prefer the piano version (since you might prefer the piano sound), but you would still like it. If you wouldn't like it, then nothing would make sense. You wouldn't like the tones used nor the rhythm they were used in, and then the only factor left would be the piano sound, thusly you would like everything on piano, whether it'd make sense or not.

Ultimately genres are redundant. Genres will NEVER tell if I like a song or not. However, I happen to like alternative rock/metal, but I see that as a coincidence, as it happens that there are more rock/metal musicians that use the tones and rhythms I like.

Jazz is more like freestyling. The songs are not set up by chorus and verse, it's usually just one long freestyle. People tend not to like this, since some seek structure in music. You COULD freestyle on Rock, but you'd probably end up with a form eventually, or it would just be called heavy Jazz or something.

So, Jazz as a genre is somewhat pointless in my opinion. I could like a jazz piece, and have it set up in structure, like chorus' and verses, and like it just as much.

Jazz, like any other genres evolve. From the little over a hundred years it has been active, it has changed into more than 20 different Jazz styles.

The popularity might have fallen a bit, since it isn't 'new' anymore, but it is likely that what you feel as less activity, is the evolution of Jazz. Consider it like energy, I doesn't go away, it just changes form. Okay sorry... Facepalm...

Anyways, I find genres redundant, so I don't care really. Call it music and leave it at that. Or rather just use genres differently, something that really defines the content.

kthxbye
 

CyberAkuma

Elite Member
Nov 27, 2007
1,055
0
41
I study Jazz at an art school.
Mainly dominant is Miles Davis, Charlie Parker and some other stuff.