NOTE: I shouldn't have to say this but I will just in case:
SPOILER WARNING NOW!
I searched a bit on Ze Escapist because I know this has been brought up repeatedly. However, I can't find a thread dedicated to it (lots of cheap shots and whatnot in other threads and "official" threads from Ze Escapist) so I figured I'd just come out and ask:
Why is "Man of Steel" hated so much (or seems that way since so much of the internet seems to hate it)?
I absolutely loved it. Personally, I thought it was one of the best superhero movies we've gotten, on par with "The Avengers".
The first act I thought was a weaker part but good. Without doing the "Here's fifty minutes of the origin story we already know", the movie was able to demonstrate who Superman was and why he acts the way he acts. Flashbacks sprinkled throughout the rest of the film flesh this out. Rather than going "Amazing Spider-Man" where the first half of the film is something we've seen, it gives us new information (for those who are not fans of the comic that is; I don't believe the actual Fall of Krypton is shown in the former movies but I could be mistaken) and allows us to learn what we need to learn without slowing the beginning to a crawl.
The second half sprinkled more background on Superman's growing up period and why he's willing to fight and why he is so reluctant to reveal himself. Good idea or bad idea for him to hide is negligible for he's going off of what he was taught growing up. Granted, the middle could have been slimmed down a bit but I had no problem with it overall.
Now the movies long, I get that. The fact that I watched it in my home rather than the theater might actually save itself from the hatred I see online (since I can pause it and do whatever I want whenever I want). This informs my next thing as the main criticism I have overheard:
"The fights in the third act are too long"
I am kind of baffled by people's reaction to the fights (for clarity sake, I am referring to all three main fights at the end; starting with Faora, middle of giant machine, ending with Zod).
Personally, I thought this was the BEST superhero fight I've ever seen. One big thing people seem to hate about old fights like this was the lack of destruction and epicness. Basically, people of old complained that a fight between two God's would result in the destruction of everything around them. This is exactly what these fights gave them and now they're too long? It seems like they're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
TLDR (That hurts my feelings D
?
So there's my opinion on the movie. If by some miracle you have read through all of it, let me know what you thought of "Man of Steel" (or even if you didn't read all of it, feel free to give your opinion). Is it a vocal minority and most people like it or are the cheap shots warranted? Liked the movie? Didn't? Have no opinion because you didn't watch it but for some reason want to feel part of the conversation?
SPOILER WARNING NOW!
I searched a bit on Ze Escapist because I know this has been brought up repeatedly. However, I can't find a thread dedicated to it (lots of cheap shots and whatnot in other threads and "official" threads from Ze Escapist) so I figured I'd just come out and ask:
Why is "Man of Steel" hated so much (or seems that way since so much of the internet seems to hate it)?
I absolutely loved it. Personally, I thought it was one of the best superhero movies we've gotten, on par with "The Avengers".
The first act I thought was a weaker part but good. Without doing the "Here's fifty minutes of the origin story we already know", the movie was able to demonstrate who Superman was and why he acts the way he acts. Flashbacks sprinkled throughout the rest of the film flesh this out. Rather than going "Amazing Spider-Man" where the first half of the film is something we've seen, it gives us new information (for those who are not fans of the comic that is; I don't believe the actual Fall of Krypton is shown in the former movies but I could be mistaken) and allows us to learn what we need to learn without slowing the beginning to a crawl.
The second half sprinkled more background on Superman's growing up period and why he's willing to fight and why he is so reluctant to reveal himself. Good idea or bad idea for him to hide is negligible for he's going off of what he was taught growing up. Granted, the middle could have been slimmed down a bit but I had no problem with it overall.
Now the movies long, I get that. The fact that I watched it in my home rather than the theater might actually save itself from the hatred I see online (since I can pause it and do whatever I want whenever I want). This informs my next thing as the main criticism I have overheard:
"The fights in the third act are too long"
I am kind of baffled by people's reaction to the fights (for clarity sake, I am referring to all three main fights at the end; starting with Faora, middle of giant machine, ending with Zod).
Personally, I thought this was the BEST superhero fight I've ever seen. One big thing people seem to hate about old fights like this was the lack of destruction and epicness. Basically, people of old complained that a fight between two God's would result in the destruction of everything around them. This is exactly what these fights gave them and now they're too long? It seems like they're damned if they do and damned if they don't.
TLDR (That hurts my feelings D
So there's my opinion on the movie. If by some miracle you have read through all of it, let me know what you thought of "Man of Steel" (or even if you didn't read all of it, feel free to give your opinion). Is it a vocal minority and most people like it or are the cheap shots warranted? Liked the movie? Didn't? Have no opinion because you didn't watch it but for some reason want to feel part of the conversation?