Poll: Most Annoying Thing About COD WAW Online???

Recommended Videos

Bertruam

New member
Feb 7, 2009
226
0
0
I hate having to sit around and wait for thier corpse to explode so I can continue. Not a problem now that my Xbox just red ringed. -_-
 

Lukeydoodly

New member
Sep 9, 2008
839
0
0
Hmm where to start... Latency, lag spikes, MP40 sniping, the uber-dogs which take more damage than soldiers, martyrdom and when my team refuses to use the tanks and gets raped because of it.

Oh yeah, and people going under the map. This was in the BETA AND THEY STILL DIDN'T FIX IT FOR THE FULL GAME.

And another oh yeah, people who get dogs, die, then call in dogs to get a further 7 kills, die, call in dogs etc...
 

Fightbulb

New member
May 14, 2008
689
0
0
I'm going to be original and say that Martyrdom is annoying as hell. Seriously, it rewards players for sucking, where the fuck is the logic in that?
 

MercenaryCanary

New member
Mar 24, 2008
1,777
0
0
The fact that the game wasn't made by Infinity Ward is the most annoying thing about that game.
They pretty much ripped off COD4 and put in WWII mode. They even did it with the covers.
<spoiler=Call of Duty 4>
http://actualgameplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/call-of-duty-4-modern-warfare-box.jpg

<spoiler=Call of Duty WAW>
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c2/Call_of_Duty_5_cover_art.PNG

See! They even copied some of the ideas of the levels. Remember "All Ghillied Up"? They took that and made it into one of their own levels. People keep telling me to get this game and I just tell them "Its the same exact game!"
 

Valiance

New member
Jan 14, 2009
3,823
0
0
I voted dogs, even though martyrdom is terrrrrrrrible as well.

Actually, most of the perks are terrible.

Actually, having a persistent online character in an FPS is a terrible idea anyway.

Wow, damn I'm glad I didn't buy that game.
 

Gamer137

New member
Jun 7, 2008
1,204
0
0
The glitch to go underground in roundhouse. That glitch was half the reason I sold it.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Major Tom said:
Mercanary57 said:
The fact that the game wasn't made by Infinity Ward is the most annoying thing about that game.
They pretty much ripped off COD4 and put in WWII mode. They even did it with the covers.
<spoiler=Call of Duty 4>
http://actualgameplay.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/call-of-duty-4-modern-warfare-box.jpg

<spoiler=Call of Duty WAW>
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c2/Call_of_Duty_5_cover_art.PNG

See! They even copied some of the ideas of the levels. Remember "All Ghillied Up"? They took that and made it into one of their own levels. People keep telling me to get this game and I just tell them "Its the same exact game!"
Now that's not fair. Treyarch has no control over packaging and marketing, that's Activisions job. If they wanted to mooch off the success of CoD4 with similar box art, that's nothing Treyarch can be blamed for.

I think Treyarch has gotten more stick than it derserves. No, I haven't played CoD3, but I have read plenty reviews. It scores on average 7-8/10 and the only review I read that was not favourable made no sense, at all. It doesn't sound like a bad game by a long shot, I would give it a go if I could find a copy.

Sure, CoD:Waw is pretty much CoD4 with a WWII skin, but remember that it is Activison that owns Call of Duty, not Treyarch or Inifinity Ward, and I would be most interested in seeing the design brief given to Treyarch in regards to CoD:WaW. Has anyone considered that they made exactly the game they were comissioned to make? Don't forget that development on CoD:WaW began long before CoD4 became immensly successful and if I remember correctly, people were moaning about CoD4 not being in WWII. CoD:WaW being the fallback, maybe?

Anyway, to the original question, I find the weapon allpick to be most annoying, mostly because it breaks the immersion somewhat for me. It works for the most part in CoD4, because in any given situation today you can find pretty much all those weapons on all sides, anywhere in the world. But we are dealing with conventional standing armies, not the hodge podge revolutionaries in CoD4, and weapons procurement is much more tightly controlled in that situation.
well i'll summarize cod 3 for you. it aint the highlight of the cod series but i will admit it was not the worst. basically cod waw is the same thing as cod 3 at least by story standards.

in multiplayer there is 5 or 6 classes to choose from each with pre-set weapons and you cant make your own class.there are a wide assortment of vehicles (trucks,motorcycles,tanks oh my), there are no perks, and all the gametypes are the same


on topic. the most annoying thing to me is that the accruacy is off a bit. in cod3 in the french campiegn you get a gun called the sten. in cod waw the japs get the very same gun but its under a diffrent name.
 

lizards

New member
Jan 20, 2009
1,159
0
0
the only thing that anyone has any right to cry about in WAW is sniping people just sit at spawn the whole damn game and then end up with the most kills and complaining about tanks then your a retard your a fucking retard
 

Onyx Oblivion

Borderlands Addict. Again.
Sep 9, 2008
17,032
0
0
If this is a THINLY veiled attempt to have people yet again decry CoD: WaW as a bad game, then I'm going to disagree. Again.

If this is just an honest question, I hate the tanks. Its not terrible, but it limits my options to my anti-tank weapons classes whenever I play on a tank map.