This arised from a slightly drunken conversation with my flatmates. I expressed my displeasure at the amount of songs about that...L word, and it branched into a conversation about interesting emotions.
I said that fear was more interesting. I've always said, discover what a man is afraid of, and you discover a door into every other part of their personality.
However, they said that about love, but I disagree. If someone loves blondes, why would that tell me anything about them. Love is incredibly simple to me. Someone wants to sleep with someone else, if the feeling's mutual, they stay together until one of them wants to sleep with someone else, then that person will leave.
And what can you do to a man once you find out what they love? Remove it from their life? Fear's more direct. You can break a man simply by talking too much about what they're truly afraid of.
So, what do you think? Remember, this is about what's more interesting. Not what's better, although I'd still say fear. The problems of fear are much easier and more satisfying to overcome, and the ups are far more valuable; only when we're truly scared, do we know who we truly are.
Feel free to mention another emotion if you're more interested in that, though.
EDIT: I feel the need to address a few things that keep popping up.
"You know nothing about love". I'm not that experienced, but I have felt it. I consider it...inconvenient to feel again. In my experience, people glorifying lust=love. There may be more elements to a relationship, but lust is the centre. No lust, no love. No one ever f***ed anyone for sense of humour. And besides, what if I were to tell you that you know nothing of real fear? Now that, I know. I lived a nightmare for several years, and was a slave to my fear of it happening again for several more. So I have a very intimate knowledge of fear.
"Fear is simple/animals feel fear". Not real fear. Not psychological fear that doesn't go for your instinctive fear of say, sharp objects, but goes for your biggest psychological weak spots.
Also, people voting for other; It's far more interesting to tell us what you're interested in.
I said that fear was more interesting. I've always said, discover what a man is afraid of, and you discover a door into every other part of their personality.
However, they said that about love, but I disagree. If someone loves blondes, why would that tell me anything about them. Love is incredibly simple to me. Someone wants to sleep with someone else, if the feeling's mutual, they stay together until one of them wants to sleep with someone else, then that person will leave.
And what can you do to a man once you find out what they love? Remove it from their life? Fear's more direct. You can break a man simply by talking too much about what they're truly afraid of.
So, what do you think? Remember, this is about what's more interesting. Not what's better, although I'd still say fear. The problems of fear are much easier and more satisfying to overcome, and the ups are far more valuable; only when we're truly scared, do we know who we truly are.
Feel free to mention another emotion if you're more interested in that, though.
EDIT: I feel the need to address a few things that keep popping up.
"You know nothing about love". I'm not that experienced, but I have felt it. I consider it...inconvenient to feel again. In my experience, people glorifying lust=love. There may be more elements to a relationship, but lust is the centre. No lust, no love. No one ever f***ed anyone for sense of humour. And besides, what if I were to tell you that you know nothing of real fear? Now that, I know. I lived a nightmare for several years, and was a slave to my fear of it happening again for several more. So I have a very intimate knowledge of fear.
"Fear is simple/animals feel fear". Not real fear. Not psychological fear that doesn't go for your instinctive fear of say, sharp objects, but goes for your biggest psychological weak spots.
Also, people voting for other; It's far more interesting to tell us what you're interested in.