Poll: San Andreas is superior to GTA4

Recommended Videos

Sansha

There's a principle in business
Nov 16, 2008
1,726
0
0
Well I've been playing the hell out of GTA4 on PC, and San Andreas on X-Box, often at the same time, and I can't help but pick SA as my favorite, and indeed Rockstar's flagship title.

The defining difference is activities to do after the storyline is over. GTA4 offers very little of this. Finding pigeons, jumps, the car stealing jobs, assassinations etc.
Now let's get one thing straight - I fucking love crime for money, it's that GTA4 has very little of it. I think nine assassination jobs, 36-something cars and bam, you're done.

Finding the pigeons is a boring, mindless chore, but it's still a giggle when they explode from a point-blank shotgun blast. And the jumps - hooboy. Some are ruthlessly difficult to do, some aren't even 'jumps'. The SA ones were more fun. Once you launched off them, you got the 500 dollars and credit no matter what, not to mention that getting airborne got you money anywhere.
Sure SA had scavenger hunts, but there seemed to be a point to them. The horseshoes for better luck in the casinos, and the oysters to have women love you.

In GTA4, that's about it. SA had all these, plus other jobs, safehouses to find and purchase (compared to 4's two or three), casinos, and the constant gang war to keep you occupied, and of course, my biggest gripe,

The game world
SA had a massive, massive game world, with varied settings and locals, from the sprawling Los Santos to the huge open plains between the cities. A big place where you could really open your throttle and do incredibly stupid stunts. Liberty City has none of this, just a succession of tightly-populated streets in one huge city. The islands are indeed varied, but not enough to call it anything other than city, more city, and revenge of the city. Six-star police chases are also ruthlessly difficult, while the inbredly stupid police in SA were just fun to mess with, while being just challenging enough to pose a threat as you jet in between them, which brings me to my next point,

Survivability.
If CJ is hit by a car, he goes "OOF" and walks it off. When he's rocketing at mach 4 on a motorcycle and hits something, he's launched off, but again he walks it off.
When Niko is hit by a car at the same speed, he takes a massive chunk of health off, which is a pain in the ass when you have shit to do. And with motorcycle crashes, he doesn't even have to go very fast before an impact launches him into the fucking stratosphere and is killed. And staying on a rocketing motorcycle is, again, much more difficult in the dense city. Speaking of getting killed,

Wasted/Busted
In SA, when you're killed, there's a little scene showing your corpse before you wake up at a hospital and off you go. If you're nailing Katie, you get out for free and don't lose your weapons. Getting Busted is the same if you're dating Barbara.
Niko, however, has the color wash out, slow-mo set in before fading out and appearing at the hospital. He pays a HUGE hospital bill, which from what I can tell is a percentage of your money. My first playthrough had Niko paying $350,000 total hospital fees. Mostly thanks to his total, total inability to operate a seat belt. (What's with that? He puts on a bike helmet but never a car seatbelt?) And getting arrested, Niko again pays huge dollars and loses tens of thousands of dollars of weapons. There's no way around this, the girlfriends instead 'helping' you prevent death/custody. Also,

Weapons
Weapons in SA are cheap, plentiful, and no limit to your ammo supply, and are much more varied to what you like. Niko's guns are expensive, and there's tier1 and tier2 weapons. Melee, pistol, shotgun, SMG, bla bla bla. The rockets are stupidly expensive, leaving me to never actually use them. At least CJ gets a minigun or flamethrower for free at the ranch. For free?

MONEY and income
At time of writing, my Niko has $600,000 from re-loading the last save every time he dies to avoid the fees and being ultra-conservative with expensive weapons. Once you do all the car and killing jobs, your ability to make money suddenly becomes a crisis situation.
CJ has exactly $168,486,065 from roulette tables, while carrying hundreds of thousands of rounds of ammo, every safehouse full of expensive, pimped-out cars and expensive clothes. Making enormous amounts of money and spending it irresponsibly in SA is fun and easy. Oh shit, cars and clothes.

Customization
Niko has three clothes stores to pick from with a laughable variety, and one of the stores does nothing but make him look like Bernie's playdate, which is strange considering his face is a permanent scowl (which by the way I am sick of looking at), can't change his hair or even supe-up his cars. (side-note: Niko can own and save a maximum of eight cars around the city. CJ can hold maybe 100ish) With GTA4's graphics, custom cars would look and sound fantastic, yet aside from PayNSpray, you're shit out of luck.
Why is this gone from GTA4 yet featured so prominently and with as much detail and options in SA? CJ could be a morbidly obese man spending the entire game in his underpants with a pink afro for all the player cares, and who hasn't thought of doing that?

Character
Niko is a whiny, angsty **** who never shuts the fuck up about his own problems. Jesus Christ.
CJ is more... sorry, is actually a three-dimensional character driven by different motivations for different circumstances. Not just "I MUZT FIND THIS MAN AND KEEL HIM" that Niko never, ever stops saying.

Finally,
What GTA4 has that I wish SA had
- horns on boats
- doing things with friends
 

Icecoldcynic

New member
Oct 5, 2009
1,268
0
0
If you want the true spiritual successor to SA, then get Saints Row 2. That game is immense fun, features all the awesome things that made SA great, AND you can do it ALL in co-op.
 

Ieyland

New member
Apr 23, 2010
576
0
0
Disagree, disagree, disagree.

You're complaining about all the little things.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
I disagree with you; GTA IV was superior to GTA:SA in most ways, though I will admit to missing the business and extra house owning possiblities that GTA:SA and GTA:VC. But aside from that, GTA IV was superior - it told a better story, in a better way, with better graphics, and slightly better gameplay. But thats my opinion.
 

Jaqen Hghar

New member
Feb 11, 2009
630
0
0
This all comes down to your opinion. I like the gritty realism of GTAIV, which makes it hell of a lot better than San Andreas in my book. So I disagree heavily with you.
And your poll is useless. Fix it.
 

Vampire cat

Apocalypse Meow
Apr 21, 2010
1,725
0
0
Ieyland said:
Disagree, disagree, disagree.

You're complaining about all the little things.
But there is a heck of a lot of little things that comes together to make SA better than 4.

What I wish SA had that I find better in 4: The cover-system, the car handling and the graphic upgrades. Else than this, SA is overall a much more enjoyable game. I have never played multiplayer GTA4, but as yatzee say (and I agree), a game should be able to stand on its singleplayer alone.
 

PhunkyPhazon

New member
Dec 23, 2009
1,967
0
0
I like GTAIV, but I do think San Andreas is the best in series. The main thing I don't like about GTAIV is...hang on a second, phones ringing. *click* "Hello? Oh hey. Bowling? Well I'm kinda busy right now, how about some other time? ... What do you mean you're pissed? You honestly expect me to drive clear across town in less then an hour, are you nuts? Well screw you too!" *hangs up*
 

SnootyEnglishman

New member
May 26, 2009
8,308
0
0
You forgot to mention the calling of your Cousin Roman or other plot-encountered friends that call you every ten minutes to go bowling with so you maybe can raise their like of you by half a percentage. Meanwhile in SA your friend like you as long you can keep them alive.
 

Icecoldcynic

New member
Oct 5, 2009
1,268
0
0
Suki the Cat said:
Ieyland said:
Disagree, disagree, disagree.

You're complaining about all the little things.
But there is a heck of a lot of little things that comes together to make SA better than 4.

What I wish SA had that I find better in 4: The cover-system, the car handling and the graphic upgrades. Else than this, SA is overall a much more enjoyable game. I have never played multiplayer GTA4, but as yatzee say (and I agree), a game should be able to stand on its singleplayer alone.
I HATE the car physics in GTA4. Even semi-realistic handling does NOT belong in a sandbox game. If I wanted to have to brake into corners, I'd play forza.
 

Cherry Cola

Your daddy, your Rock'n'Rolla
Jun 26, 2009
11,940
0
0
While I do think that SA is a superior title, there are many points I don't agree with you.

Like saying CJ is a three-dimensional character. All he does is he gets manipulated into doing something, then kills someone to fix it. Over and over and over again. He's not three-dimensional.

SA's gameworld was too big. Way too big. People complain about Just Cause 2 having a game world that was too big. Well at least you could call in a helicopter to take you to the place you needed to go to.

And finally, saying SA is superior because it has dumber A.I. is wrong in so many ways.

Still, I too enjoyed SA more than I enjoyed GTA 4. And as has been stated, get Saint's Row 2, because it is even better than SA.

[sub]Also, Vice City is still the best GTA game[/sub]
 

Ieyland

New member
Apr 23, 2010
576
0
0
SnootyEnglishman said:
You forgot to mention the calling of your Cousin Roman or other plot-encountered friends that call you every ten minutes to go bowling with so you maybe can raise their like of you by half a percentage. Meanwhile in SA your friend like you as long you can keep them alive.
PhunkyPhazon said:
I like GTAIV, but I do think San Andreas is the best in series. The main thing I don't like about GTAIV is...hang on a second, phones ringing. *click* "Hello? Oh hey. Bowling? Well I'm kinda busy right now, how about some other time? ... What do you mean you're pissed? You honestly expect me to drive clear across town in less then an hour, are you nuts? Well screw you too!" *hangs up*
Turn it off, then.

Like what Jaqen said earlier, I like how realistic GTAIV was. Taxi drivers, the way he gets hit by an oncoming vehicle, going out with your friends (yes it gets annoying but I have always been partial to Roman's conversations while driving).

It sure as hell looks better. GTA:III is undoubtedly one of the most important games this decade, but I enjoyed it. I didn't finish it though, because the map was too big for me, hard to move around.
 

Delusibeta

Reachin' out...
Mar 7, 2010
2,594
0
0
While I've never played either, the fact that you're comparing the PC version of GTA IV (which is a notoriously bad port) with a console version of San Andreas has to be raised. But still, each to their own.
 

ShakesZX

New member
Nov 28, 2009
503
0
0
You make some good points, but fail to realize that your premise: "Both GTA San Andreas and 4 should be the same game because they are both GTA" is flawed. San Andreas and 4 are vastly different experiences. I believe that Rockstar tried to make GTA4 more realistic. As such, they succeeded. These problems, all of them, however minor, are all in relation to the realistic aspect of the game versus the others.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
PhunkyPhazon said:
I like GTAIV, but I do think San Andreas is the best in series. The main thing I don't like about GTAIV is...hang on a second, phones ringing. *click* "Hello? Oh hey. Bowling? Well I'm kinda busy right now, how about some other time? ... What do you mean you're pissed? You honestly expect me to drive clear across town in less then an hour, are you nuts? Well screw you too!" *hangs up*
Off button. There is an off button.
 

PhunkyPhazon

New member
Dec 23, 2009
1,967
0
0
Ieyland said:
Turn it off, then.
I typically do, though it's easy to forget about it when it turns itself back on after a mission. <_<

Besides, I don't think it's a good idea on the developers part to have people constantly call you up wanting to hang out, only to decline and have their respect for you go down. If it weren't for that, I'd be less peeved. Otherwise it's either go do something you don't want to do, or to get a giant thumbs down. This is an open-world game for crying out loud, there's no reason the player should get punished for not wanting to do something.
 

MetallicaRulez0

New member
Aug 27, 2008
2,503
0
0
I do often post stupid stuff, but I feel it necessary.

A ball of lint is a better GTA game than GTA4. GTA4 is perhaps the single most overhyped, overrated game in the history of games. Even more-so than Halo 3.