Poll: Who's the daddy? Paternity test.

Recommended Videos

Donbett1974

New member
Jan 28, 2009
615
0
0
It's estimated that 1.7%-20%(depending on what study you believe)that men are raising children they believe they father but did not. The question is should a paternity test be done when the child is born.

Edit: Paternity test is to determine the father of the child.
 

Gigano

Whose Eyes Are Those Eyes?
Oct 15, 2009
2,281
0
0
Much peace have probably been kept by dogmatically stating that a child born in marriage was fathered by the husband.

What good would come of exposing it for anyone? And how much harm?
 

GeorgW

ALL GLORY TO ME!
Aug 27, 2010
4,806
0
0
I don't see any reason not to, it could probably make a difference.
 

SilentCom

New member
Mar 14, 2011
2,417
0
0
I don't think paternity tests should be mandatory but the option available if there is reasonable doubt.
 

Ham_authority95

New member
Dec 8, 2009
3,496
0
0
Don't they do those anyway? If not, I think it should be an option, just in case one of the parents has a genetic liability.
 

WingedIncubus

New member
Nov 5, 2010
229
0
0
Paternity tests should be mandatory. We are advanced enough technologically and scientifically to make these tests well before the birth, there is no excuse.

Fathers have a right to know if the mommy has been a skank or not before they are trapped paying for a kid who isn't theirs for 18 to 21 years.
 

JoJo

and the Amazing Technicolour Dream Goat 🐐
Moderator
Legacy
Mar 31, 2010
7,170
143
68
Country
🇬🇧
Gender
♂
Only if the father has suspicions, I can't see any harm in a few cuckoo'd babies existing, after-all this would only lead to yet more families with split up parents.
 

Mister Benoit

New member
Sep 19, 2008
992
0
0
I'd do it just so i'm sure the hospital hasn't swapped my baby for someone else's by mistake. Considering most of the nurses there work 14-18 hour shifts I can see mistakes being made rather often.
 

Donbett1974

New member
Jan 28, 2009
615
0
0
Imperator_DK said:
Much peace have probably been kept by dogmatically stating that a child born in marriage was fathered by the husband.

What good would come of exposing it for anyone? And how much harm?
First off man wouldn't have to stay with a cheating wife. Second the wife won't feel guilty for lying to her husband 18 years. Third and more important the child will have a less chance to grow and have sex with his/her's half-brother/sister.
 

OtherSideofSky

New member
Jan 4, 2010
1,051
0
0
Probably. I'm all for the truth coming out, regardless of what consequences it may have, and its always good to have more thorough cataloging systems. Plus, I'm sure there's a geneticist somewhere who could work out something interesting out of all that data.
 

thethingthatlurks

New member
Feb 16, 2010
2,102
0
0
Mittens The Kitten said:
Genetics shouldn't mean anything in child-raising.
Uhm yes, that's kinda the whole point of having children...

Yes, why not? A delivery is expensive enough as is, might as well throw in a paternity test to make sure. Plus it'll make birth certificates much more valuable as identification documents.
 

Fetzenfisch

New member
Sep 11, 2009
2,460
0
0
Mittens The Kitten said:
Genetics shouldn't mean anything in child-raising.
I agree completely.
Well if they insist they may check secretly, just to prevend accidentally swaping the children. But i believe that this actully happens more often in hollywood than in reality.
 

JaredXE

New member
Apr 1, 2009
1,378
0
0
I'd like to know if the ***** cheated on me, and no, I would NOT raise another man's child like that.

Marrying a woman who had kids before she met you...fine. Being fooled into thinking you're the father because your wife/girlfriend is a slut....no freakin' way.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
It should be an option yeah. You don?t want guys being forced to pay child support or sticking with the mother purely because they think the kid is theirs but it shouldn?t be mandatory.
 

Treaos Serrare

New member
Aug 19, 2009
445
0
0
id be very interested to hear from these people who claim it doesn't matter when they find out the child their wife gave birth to was not fathered by them, i doubt they would be willing to keep that opinion.

personally i agree that it should be mandatory and both parties are informed verbally and in writing
 

Wolfenbarg

Terrible Person
Oct 18, 2010
682
0
0
That sounds horribly biased and unfair to me. Issuing paternity tests is fine and all if you have probable cause to believe that there was some adultery going on, but to issue it at birth? How lacking in trust do you have to be to go that far? Also, is this an issue of consent? Because I seriously doubt the mother would stand for such a thing after giving birth.
 

KingofallCosmos

New member
Nov 15, 2010
742
0
0
According to the figures I heard 1 in 10 children have a different father. Even if half of that is right, It would lead to a lot of friction if the test were mandatory. Not that it's the best choice to live in blissful ignorance, but just the fact that monogamy has never truly existed with people leads me to think it would not be a good idea.
 

teisjm

New member
Mar 3, 2009
3,561
0
0
Mittens The Kitten said:
Genetics shouldn't mean anything in child-raising.
Well, if teh child is not the fathers, and he later finds out his wife has been cheating, he might end up leaving a child who has grown old enough to consider him it's father, instead of leaving an infant, who will never know him as a father, but might end up nkowing it's real father, who hopefully will accept his reponsibilities as a parent, and be a father for the child, instead.

I know it may sound cruel, but i can easily imagine someone leaving their wife and child if they find out she had been cheating and the child wasn't theirs.
Even though teh child never did anything, it'll still be a constant reminder to the not-fatehr that his significant other fucked around, and it could probably fuck up teh father/child relations big time.

Of course the real problem here are people cheating, not the child.