Poll: Would you embrace a shift to purely digital distribution of games?

Recommended Videos

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,864
0
41
I've been thinking about this a lot lately, especially regarding the current shitstorm surrounding the used game market.

Personally, I do buy used games but I also buy second-hand from time to time, mainly because I think it's preposterous that stores still charge full-price for a game like Modern Warfare just because they know they can get away with it.

On the other hand, though, I was in HMV the other day (big chain of stores in the UK, if you aren't familiar) and I noticed that every game on display was second-hand, all the first-hand games were crammed onto a shelf right at the floor. The only first-hand games actually being displayed properly were in the top ten chart, but even they had a second hand copy right next to them.

All that aside, though, what I'm really wondering is how you would all feel if games went completely digital, as in no hard copies being sold at all anymore. Assume you could still buy a code for the game in stores to redeem online if you aren't comfortable with giving out bank details, but no actual goods would change hands.

Is this a system you'd get behind, or do you still like having something physical to show for your cash?

Edit: All the replies so far sort of cover my feelings on the subject. I like having a physical copy of things I buy, but to me the benefits of a purely digital system to me far outweigh the cons.

Just off the top of my head:
-Costs would theoretically come down because companies would no longer have to press millions of discs, get boxes etc
-The more a DD service gets used the faster it will go as companies, not to mention the general advance of technology. I mean, I still remember using dial-up, and my broadband connection gets faster every year.
-We'd be more likely to see global releases of titles, i.e. the more eccentric titles Japan releases that would never get a release overseas because they're just not likely to sell, but if they are distributing them online then the only real cost is bandwidth that only gets used up if people buy
-I have an ever-increasing library of old games from the Mega Drive right up to current consoles. I'm also lucky enough that all my original consoles work, but I don't look forward to the prospect of carting a huge cache of games wherever I go in life. Plus it's worth remembering that it's likely your cartridges and consoles are going to stop working eventually.
-I doubt it's possible (or that they'd allow it) but it'd be nice if there was some way I could put the old game discs in and unlock them in the virtual library, sort of like burning a CD.

Edit 2: Taking on board the valid problems alot of people would have with this system, let's now assume the following...

-DRM is made obsolete by a USB key that you receive with your console that downloads all your account information (username, titles purchased etc) so that if the system ever crashes/wipes you retain all your information and purchase history. All you have to do is never lose this key which shouldn't be a problem since it should never come out of your console.
-Assume that a robust internet is available to all. My real interest is in how you would feel about the concept of purely digital distribution, so take for granted that we have internet powerful enough to accommodate that.
-One of the biggest problems people seem to have is that prices will skyrocket as soon as Xbox/PSN has exclusive control over the cost of their games. I've explained in replies why I think this is a stupid idea. If prices are driven to high then sales will plummet so it's ultimately in their best interests to charge fair prices just like stores have always done.
 

madwarper

New member
Mar 17, 2011
1,841
0
0
Maybe, sometime in the future...

When I get bored, I'll look at my wall of games, and pick one I haven't played in a while and pop it in. Thus, in a matter of seconds, I'm playing the game.

If I had to uninstall the digitally downloaded game, most likely because of space reasons, then I'd have to find something else to remove to make space, redownload it, wait to install, then play it. Thus, making me wait to play the game.
 

StBishop

New member
Sep 22, 2009
3,251
0
0
madwarper said:
Maybe, sometime in the future...

When I get bored, I'll look at my wall of games, and pick one I haven't played in a while and pop it in. Thus, in a matter of seconds, I'm playing the game.

If I had to uninstall the digitally downloaded game, most likely because of space reasons, then I'd have to find something else to remove to make space, redownload it, wait to install, then play it. Thus, making me wait to play the game.
Get more hard drives. It's like $100.00 for a 1TB HDD now.

EDIT: This is the same price as MW3's RRP here.
 

krazykidd

New member
Mar 22, 2008
6,099
0
0
Not a chance in hell. I like having physical copies , the day everything goes digital , is the day i stop gaming. I am actually building up my library for when this day comes , because i know it will come unfortunately . I can see the benefits of it , it's just that i personally don't like it.
 

bojackx

New member
Nov 14, 2010
807
0
0
Whilst I appreciate having a solid copy of a game, I'd still like a purely digital games industry. I like the idea of thinking in 10 years time:

"Hey! I totally want to play that old game I used to play, umm... Skyrim, That's the game! Too bad I don't have the disk, it means I can't play... oh wait! I can just go on Steam and download it!"

Basically, all you need is to remember a password and then you have access to a large amount of games you used to play, and that's why I'm willing to accept a totally digital age.
 

JayElleBee

New member
Jul 9, 2010
213
0
0
I'd really rather not. I like having my physical copies of games and I don't like having to toss my bank details around all over the internet just to buy something. I don't like having to wait hours for my game to download.

I just don't like it.
 

endtherapture

New member
Nov 14, 2011
3,127
0
0
It's nice for some games. I've found that downloading a game overnight generally works for games avoiding peak times and that's not really a problem.

It's also better for the environment.

I think physical games should be only for special Collector's Editions.

Obviously games should be playable offline though.
 

Lilani

Sometimes known as CaitieLou
May 27, 2009
6,581
0
0
I wouldn't really mind it, pretty much all of my game purchases recently have been through Steam. I've got Windows and Mac so I'm pretty much covered in that regard. As for console Digital Distribution, if I had a console newer than the PSP I wouldn't be opposed to that, either (but for now I'm pretty content with being a PC-onry gamer).
 

go-10

New member
Feb 3, 2010
1,557
0
0
while digital distribution I still like to collect things, I cannot imagine seeing the next Zelda in my digital library and not in my hands or in my shelf next to every other Zelda game ever released. What would I do then print out the page that shows I have it? Its just not the same I want a physical copy.
even if it is just a box with a code, or like VITA a box with a memory card, I still want the goddamn box
 

boag

New member
Sep 13, 2010
1,623
0
0
Definetly.

My main problem right now with Brick and Mortar Stores is that the selection is limited to the Cawaduty and Sport Game Roster Updates, if Im looking for something I might not even be able to find a new copy of it unless I pre ordered and even then its a hassle.
 

MetalDooley

Cwipes!!!
Feb 9, 2010
2,054
0
1
Country
Ireland
No.DD only would be terrible.Perhaps not so much for PC gamers as they have some choice but for console gamers would be horrible.Imagine a future where Xbox Live is the only place to buy Xbox games.Their prices are ridiculous enough already without them having a monopoly on games sales as well
 

rob_simple

Elite Member
Aug 8, 2010
1,864
0
41
MetalDooley said:
No.DD only would be terrible.Perhaps not so much for PC gamers as they have some choice but for console gamers would be horrible.Imagine a future where Xbox Live is the only place to buy Xbox games.Their prices are ridiculous enough already without them having a monopoly on games sales as well
The prices on Xbox live and PSN are actually pretty decent, not any worse than in traditional stores, certainly.

If the entire industry was going digital, as well, you'd probably find that everything wouldn't necessarily go through Microsoft and Sony alone, but that developers would set up their own distribution sites and the consoles would only be the hub to play on.
 

Martijn Nijkeuter

New member
Oct 20, 2011
35
0
0
Hell no,

My biggest issues are simply price and quality.
For most of Europe the digital sellers sell the products for full price and count 1 euro as 1 dollar. Compare that to a physical copy which a fair amount of web-shops sell cheaper then normal stores and we end up with a 20+ euro difference.
For a product that has more quality (no internet required to download, + booklet, disc, codes on black and white and a fancy case) and i'm only tempted to buy digital if they have a 50-75% sale.

Not to forget that if you use origins or steam you have less rights then when you buy the physical version. That includes those horror stories of people losing their gaming library on steam/origin due to a transgression/error/doomsday scenario.
 

Fishyash

Elite Member
Dec 27, 2010
1,154
0
41
believer258 said:
However, if everything were to suddenly go digital I wouldn't have much of a problem with it, with one caveat: I must be able to start and play the fucking thing offline. As in, I booted up the computer offline, I started the digital distribution service offline, and started the game offline. Not Steam's "offline" mode, completely offline. Not allowing me to do this is stupid of Steam, it seems to be an anti-piracy measure that can't really be that effective.
Agreed on this.

I personally wouldn't mind that you would need to be connected to the internet if games were completely digital, but I would embrace it with arms wide open if digital distributors other than gamersgate or GOG actually sold their games this way.
 

MetalDooley

Cwipes!!!
Feb 9, 2010
2,054
0
1
Country
Ireland
rob_simple said:
The prices on Xbox live and PSN are actually pretty decent, not any worse than in traditional stores, certainly.
Not in my experience.For example I recently picked up a brand new copy of Metro 2033 for ?12.It's price on XBL - ?20.?8 mightn't seem like a huge difference but it's still significant.I've bought games(all brand new I should add)and then checked them on XBL and in some cases there's been a difference of ?15-?20 between the retail price and the XBL price.If that's pretty decent then I'd hate to see your idea of bad prices

Thing is retail prices are driven by popularity and shelf space.Stores will often heavily discount older/less popular titles to make room for new/best selling titles.With DD that reasoning doesn't exist so there is no reason or incentive to discount titles as much
 

TehCookie

Elite Member
Sep 16, 2008
3,923
0
41
I would hate it. I would not want my games to be taken care of my someone (or something in this case) else, if I lose or break them it should be my responsibility. I want to own my games and be able to share the games with my friends. I want to play them 20 or more years in the future without having to rebuy them. My internet isn't stable and when it goes down I would like to still be able to play games. I don't want to have to worry about my saves, did anyone ever have a issue with classic memorycards (besides losing them which is entirely your fault)? I don't want to be unable to play my games because I shitposted in a forum. I also liked being able to ragequit without hurting my machine. I like strolling through stores and seeing what looks like a good improv buy. I'm already annoyed games no longer have good manuals to read while I do it. I don't like things fucking with my games either. I downloaded the infamous Vampire: Masquerades installed the unoffical patch and played it just fine. Next time I opened steam it tried to update it and ended up crashing the game so I had to uninstall it reinstall it, along with the patch to get it to work again (why are automatic updates a good thing? Just tell me when I need to do and don't force shut down my computer when I'm in the middle of using it. I know it's in the options to change it but I wonder why that's the default). As someone else mentioned that I didn't even think of, space. I have more physical space than digital space, and a shelf of games always looks neat.

I'm so oldschool. Bah you kids today with your fifty dollar haircuts and your cell phones and your HD TVs. Back in my day games were made with nintendium and were practically undestroyable! I bet you whippersnappers don't even know how to walk uphill both ways in the snow!
 

DanielBrown

Dangerzone!
Dec 3, 2010
3,838
0
0
No.
Perhaps I'm old fashioned, but when I buy a game I want to have a physical copy to show for it. Only digital game I've bought is Titan Quest and it's expansion, and I wish I would have gotten it from a store instead.