Poll: Would you support a modern day Robin Hood?

Recommended Videos

Saucycarpdog

New member
Sep 30, 2009
3,258
0
0
The barefoot bandit(look him up if you don't know) got me thinking about what a modern day robin hood would look like and how people would percieve him. When I say robin hood, I mean the standard someone who steals from rich people and gives to the poor even if its through charities or something.

I would think so what with the hate of the rich now a days and with the every widening gap between the rich and the poor. Of course he probably would have the FBI on his trail and some would just see him as a vigilante.

What do you guys think?
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
I'm from Nottingham.

I believe I'm obligated to say yes, otherwise I have to move out of town.

I don't want to move out of town.

It's where all my stuff is.
 

DugMachine

New member
Apr 5, 2010
2,566
0
0
Depends. Who's he (OR SHE DON'T HIT ME) stealing from? That silly australian woman or decent folk like say Bill Gates (who gives a crap load of his money anyways)?

I put no because most rich folk are not people that should be punished and many do donate loads of money to charities.
 

krazykidd

New member
Mar 22, 2008
6,099
0
0
Spot1990 said:
No, being rich isn't a crime you should be punished for. And I say that as a guy who's dinner today consisted of sausages and instant noodles (a whopping 70c in total). I don't like people giving me things I haven't earned.
Pride is a terrible thing .

OT: No , stealing is bad . The thing about robin hood is , he stole from the rich , because the rich ( in this case the prince if i remember correctly ) was stealing from the poor . Taking all their money only to fill up his chambers with money . Barely leaving the common folk with enough money to live . Everyone outside the castle gates were poor . Robin hoods goal wasn't to "Steal" from the rich folk , but to give back to the poor what was theirs to begin with , and what was unfairly taken from them .
 

pppppppppppppppppp

New member
Jun 23, 2011
1,519
0
0
Let's see here, if you took Gina Rinehart's 30 billion plus 25 billion each from the Koch brothers and another 25 from Sheldon Adelson's casino empire, you'd end up with 105 billion dollars. Divide that by 7 billion, and you get about 15 bucks for each person on Earth.

I'm pretty sure almost everyone on the planet could use an extra 15 bucks right now. :p
 

Saladfork

New member
Jul 3, 2011
921
0
0
Well... I certainly wouldn't object to someone fleecing Rinehart for all she's worth, distributing some to her employees and giving the rest to the Australian government to help cover the costs of free health care and post secondary education. Could you imagine the look on her face? It'd be hilarious.

I really do hate that woman, which is quite a feat seeing as I've never met her.
 

twistedmic

Elite Member
Legacy
Sep 8, 2009
2,542
210
68
The thing about Robin Hood, from what I remember of the movies and the few stories I've read, was that he stole from cruel and corrupt people, mainly Prince John and the Sheriff of Nottingham. He didn't go around ripping off people who just happened to be rich, he was fighting against a corrupt and totally uncaring ruling class that was above the law.
Nowadays, we have charities, shelters, food banks and various other support structures and systems in place to help the poor/needy.
 

King of Asgaard

Vae Victis, Woe to the Conquered
Oct 31, 2011
1,926
0
0
No, but then again, I've never seen the appeal of a person, or group of people, taking wealth and redistributing it among the less fortunate.
It smacks of arrogance to think that the less fortunate deserve money more than those who've earned their riches.
 

Doclector

New member
Aug 22, 2009
5,010
0
0
Spot1990 said:
No, being rich isn't a crime you should be punished for. And I say that as a guy who's dinner today consisted of sausages and instant noodles (a whopping 70c in total). I don't like people giving me things I haven't earned.
Being rich because you're an asshole who used the law's bias towards the rich to attain and keep their wealth should be. There are things that people do that aren't illegal, but should be. Using loopholes to avoid tax, using technicalities to screw people out of money and get away with it. These people should be punished.
 

Korolev

No Time Like the Present
Jul 4, 2008
1,853
0
0
What do you define as rich and poor? By world standards, virtually everyone on this forum is incredibly wealthy. Anyone who genuinely steals from the rich and gives to the poor would rob most of us blind and give it to developing nations.

Given how I like my things, I'd say that I would not support him. Besides, we live in a democracy. You think the poor should get more? Vote for politicians who agree!

"But Koroleve," you say, "The rich control the electoral process and the media!". Well, no, they don't really control it entirely. If they did, Obama would never have been elected. The vote in the US is still free and mostly (not entirely) fair. It's just that Americans for the most part have brought in to the two party system and a lot of Americans hate the poor.

You can claim that it's the media and all those political ads that warp the process - um... who listens to the ads? Who believes them? That's right, the people.

You have LEGAL and SAFE ways to redistribute wealth if that's what most Americans want. Most Americans do not want that. And no, attending your college rallies does not prove that most of America wants what you want - your college rallies are not representative of the US population! It's astonishing how many naive college students fail to realize that the political make up of the college campus does NOT reflect the political make up of the USA in its entirety. That is why you are often so shocked when politicians you like fail to get elected, despite everyone around YOU supporting them. Everyone around YOU is not EVERYONE. It's not a hard concept to grasp.

The US people have the means to make a fairer, nicer, richer nation. But most of them don't care enough to make it a reality. The US gets the government it deserves!

So where am I going with this tangent? Ah yes - a modern day robin hood would brake the law. The law is the will of the majority of the people. What's that you say! The law sucks! Well, then, guess who is to blame for THAT! There is no grand conspiracy keeping the US down, there is no mastermind plot behind why there are so many poor people in the US - simply put, the majority of the people in the US (much like the majority of people in EVERY NATION - that goes for China, UK, Germany, France, Japan, Australia, Iceland, Angola, Brazil etc), are selfish, shortsighted and easily fooled by big bright shiny ads.

You want redistribution of wealth? Convince your fellow citizens it is a good idea (and good luck with that). Don't go supporting a vigilante.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
Being rich is not in itself a crime. Robin Hood might be most remembered for robbing the rich and giving to the poor but he had a lot of other stuff about his situation. Such as the rich guy also being a tyrannical dictator and taxing the people literally to starvation. The king was also only on the throne because his brother was off being noble, which meant that all those taxes shouldn't even have happened (going by the story here, not the actual history of it)

So if a guy showed up robbing rich people I'd condemn him.

If a guy showed up trying to bring down a tyrannical dictator who was oppressing people who just happaned to be rich, and part of bringing him down included redistributing his wealth, I'd probably support him.

But who exactly would they be fighting against? How many obscenely wealthy dictators are left in the world?
 

the_green_dragon

New member
Nov 18, 2009
660
0
0
krazykidd said:
OT: No , stealing is bad . The thing about robin hood is , he stole from the rich , because the rich ( in this case the prince if i remember correctly ) was stealing from the poor . Taking all their money only to fill up his chambers with money . Barely leaving the common folk with enough money to live . Everyone outside the castle gates were poor . Robin hoods goal wasn't to "Steal" from the rich folk , but to give back to the poor what was theirs to begin with , and what was unfairly taken from them .
Wait... isn't that what the FAT CAT CEOs of the banks and other corporations are doing?