Portal Gun a WMD?

Recommended Videos

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
So I was thinking about Portal and how it's considered one of the best "non-violent" games around, not counting the last level... which is odd considering you're running around with a WMD in your hands.

Seriously I can think of 3 methods of incredible destruction just off the top of my head with that gun.

Method 1: portal in volcano, portal in major city.... bad juju happens.

Method 2: So objects retain their velocity when exiting a portal right? Everyone has done the one on the roof, one of the ground thing, imagine that with a 20kg chunk of metal, leave it there for a while until it builds up a nice and nasty relativistic speed, change the exit portal to a major city, watch city vaporise.

Method 3: Set a portal under a city in the storm drains, set another portal in the ocean, watch the city go shloooooooooomp.

So any other suggestions for making a WMD out of the portal gun?
 

RathWolf

New member
Apr 14, 2009
326
0
0
That all relies on those places being "portal compatible", when clearly, not all surfaces are.
 

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
RathWolf said:
That all relies on those places being "portal compatible", when clearly, not all surfaces are.
Ways around that, a slab of portal compatible material dip into whatever place you need.
 

ciancon

Waiting patiently.....
Nov 27, 2009
612
0
0
It isn't in itself a weapon of mass destruction. But think about the all out war that would be waged on a country if that country were to develop such a technology!
 

Om Nom Nom

New member
Feb 13, 2010
267
0
0
Portal on the moon (or otherwise in space), portal on Earth.

Bye-bye atmosphere.
._.
 

Venerax

New member
Apr 2, 2010
33
0
0
Method 2 would fail due to terminal velocity.
But otherwise... Yeah, who cares? o_O It's not like the game utilises or even implies these acts of violence. It's still a very peaceful game (last level notwithstanding).
 

Lust

New member
Mar 23, 2010
2,437
0
0
Well if you're going to use it for that purpose, then, yeah it is.
 

randomsix

New member
Apr 20, 2009
773
0
0
Assuming range is no issue, shoot the side of the moon, shoot the ground, lose atmosphere.

Edit: and method 2 could be achieved by evacuating the atmosphere out of the room the portals are placed in. Like a bell jar (except a room).
 

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
Ekit said:
What's a WMD?
Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Venerax said:
Method 2 would fail due to terminal velocity.
But otherwise... Yeah, who cares? o_O It's not like the game utilises or even implies these acts of violence. It's still a very peaceful game (last level notwithstanding).
It's fun to thing about these things? Coming up with ideas to destroy the world with fictional devices is entertaining!

You're right about method 2 but I'm sure there are ways around that.
 

Space Spoons

New member
Aug 21, 2008
3,335
0
0
Well, assuming the portal fired out of the gun maintains its speed and trajectory, you could fire one at the sun, and the other at any surface on Earth. I don't know if, like, the sun's fire would come blasting out of the Earth-side portal or what, but it's somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 million degrees. Even just having a small, man-sized portal emitting that kind of heat in a localized area would be disastrous.

Hell, you could fire the gun pretty much anywhere in space and guarantee a disaster. You might not be sure where it'll hit, but chances are good it won't have oxygen. Anything close to the other end of the portal would get sucked out for sure.
 

Chamale

New member
Sep 9, 2009
1,345
0
0
Have you ever read Armageddon? [http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=118771] or its sequel, Pantheocide [http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=134719]?

A major plot point is how humanity's enemies, which have portal technology but an otherwise inferior military, can use portals as superweapons. They use all 3 of your ideas at various points, but I won't spoil the story by telling you exactly how they use these ideas.
 

Jehovatron

New member
Feb 22, 2009
39
0
0
/agree with the statements that scenario 2 can't happen due to terminal velocity... but the portal vacuum is rather inventive. You premise is flawed, however: if you agree with those who say that the portal gun should be considered non-violent then you have precluded the legitimacy of viewing the gun as a WMD- a thing designed specifically to destroy civilizations. The portal gun must be seen as nothing more than a tool, albeit a powerful one, that can only cause harm if used improperly. A pneumatic hammer can be used easily destroy people, structures, roadways, pipelines, etc., but has always been considered a tool- not a weapon. A thermonuclear device, being a WMD, has always been considered a weapon first and, perhaps, a tool second - not vice versa - and that classification separates it from the portal gun in terms of their intended uses, thus, their appropriate labels.
Also, the same examples that were used to show how the portal gun is capable of being used for destruction can also be slightly modified to serve a constructive purpose: 1. A portal could be installed next to a lava pool to serve as a port for a geothermal energy system. 2. A portal could replace inflatable bags to catch suicidal people jumping off of tall buildings or, perhaps, a large enough portal could be used to redirect an incoming asteroid. 3. A portal could be used to drain flood waters. 4. To suck harmful gasses (from a leak, maybe) out into space. 5. Near the sun to provide a cheap, effective means of waste disposal.
 

crudus

New member
Oct 20, 2008
4,415
0
0
tkioz said:
Method 1: portal in volcano, portal in major city.... bad juju happens.
I am not sure how portals react with fluids to be honest. I can't imagine it would be that dangerous though. If this existed then people would think of this and ways to stop it. Although, the inside of a volcano isn't exactly flat and you need a flat surface to place a portal.

tkioz said:
Method 2: So objects retain their velocity when exiting a portal right? Everyone has done the one on the roof, one of the ground thing, imagine that with a 20kg chunk of metal, leave it there for a while until it builds up a nice and nasty relativistic speed, change the exit portal to a major city, watch city vaporise.
There is something called a terminal velocity. There is not "mass destruction" but something equivalent to vandalism sure.

tkioz said:
Method 3: Set a portal under a city in the storm drains, set another portal in the ocean, watch the city go shloooooooooomp.
I am really not sure what you are getting at here
 

Jo The Shmo

New member
Nov 7, 2009
5
0
0
I agree that the portal gun could be used violently, but that doesn't mean Portal is a violent game.

I mean, there are knives in Cooking Mama...
 

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
Chamale said:
Have you ever read Armageddon? [http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=118771] or its sequel, Pantheocide [http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=134719]?

A major plot point is how humanity's enemies, which have portal technology but an otherwise inferior military, can use portals as superweapons. They use all 3 of your ideas at various points, but I won't spoil the story by telling you exactly how they use these ideas.
mmm sounds interesting, I'll have to give it a read.
 

Ekit

New member
Oct 19, 2009
1,183
0
0
tkioz said:
Ekit said:
What's a WMD?
Weapon of Mass Destruction.
Ok, thanks.

OT: It will be hard considering the portal gun only works on certain surfaces.

But maybe you could put one portal on the bottom of the ocean and the other on the street?
 

tkioz

Fussy Fiddler
May 7, 2009
2,301
0
0
crudus said:
tkioz said:
Method 1: portal in volcano, portal in major city.... bad juju happens.
I am not sure how portals react with fluids to be honest. I can't imagine it would be that dangerous though. If this existed then people would think of this and ways to stop it. Although, the inside of a volcano isn't exactly flat and you need a flat surface to place a portal.
Lava is nasty stuff, set the portal to drop it in the middle of a large area, having it up high, for example a helicopter holding a slab of something with the portal on it, lava comes pouring out, dropping host nasty goo all over the city at a fairly fast rate.

crudus said:
tkioz said:
tkioz said:
Method 2: So objects retain their velocity when exiting a portal right? Everyone has done the one on the roof, one of the ground thing, imagine that with a 20kg chunk of metal, leave it there for a while until it builds up a nice and nasty relativistic speed, change the exit portal to a major city, watch city vaporise.
There is something called a terminal velocity. There is not "mass destruction" but something equivalent to vandalism sure.
True, I forgot about that when I was dreaming it up, but I'm sure there are methods around this, depends on how much you want to blow something up.

crudus said:
tkioz said:
tkioz said:
Method 3: Set a portal under a city in the storm drains, set another portal in the ocean, watch the city go shloooooooooomp.
I am really not sure what you are getting at here
Well massive underwater flood of the large city would disestablish the foundations of the city leading to buildings falling over :) At least I think that would be the case anyway.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
Jo The Shmo said:
I agree that the portal gun could be used violently, but that doesn't mean Portal is a violent game.

I mean, there are knives in Cooking Mama...
/thread

Also, the Portal could be placed on a planet. You're in Space and pop a Nuke.

Place a Portal in a Car with the President. Place Rocket Launcher. Not WMD but killing the President can count in some ways.