Seconded.Jim Grim said:Woah that's nit-picky.
I'm so not going to go there. Must... get... mind... out... of... the... gutter...tokugawa98 said:I've gone and watched Avatar yesterday - enjoyed the movie immensely, the story is simple but the images astounding. I especially loved the creatures that populate the jungle.
And it is in this context that I noticed that essentially everything on Pandora has *6* extremities - the Hammershark rhino, the big cat-like predator, the smaller predators, the "horses", the flyers...everything.
Except, that is, the natives. Which doesn't make any sense at all after all we know about evolution. Why should this species lose the extra pair of extremities? If they had been a disadvantage, they would have been negatively selected before...
Any coherent explanation of this you can think off?![]()
and their hair, probably counts, though that would technically give the horsethings and the banshees 7, but hay ho. awesome movie, so yeah. really nit-picky. am happy to let it slide.stinkychops said:Do you mean appendages? I've never heard of extremities.
They have tails though. So that brings them up to 5. The 6'th doesent count because what about the females eh? EH!?![]()
Thirded, but it is a good point, if obscure.Spacelord said:Seconded.Jim Grim said:Woah that's nit-picky.
Actually I'm just glad this thread isn't about alien dongs.
It's only a matter of time.Spacelord said:Seconded.Jim Grim said:Woah that's nit-picky.
Actually I'm just glad this thread isn't about alien dongs.