It just blows my mind that there are people who want this taken away from him.
He earned his way to this money, hell yeah he should get to keep it. Not everyone who has rich folks wants to ride on their coattails in order to succeed; some want to try to do it themselves. People ***** about "trust fund babies" just living off of their parents money but attack this kid for trying to make it himself; we can't have it both ways people...
Besides, there are options for people who don't come from wealthy families. I did not have any assistance from any relative for my $120,000 education and I found a way to get it done (granted, I'm going to be paying for $80,000 of that for a good decade but the point is that there are options). I was one of the stupid kids and I got $40,000 in assistance over my four-years.
The only thing that makes me shaky about this is the fact that it's government money (Public school, therefore I believe it would be tax payers money but I could be wrong) EDIT: This is not public money, the money is raised by the athletic department so the only thing I thought was remotely questionable is not an issue /EDIT. I think that he should be able to return the money if he wishes but if he wants to go with it, let him; he earned it and to take it away from him demonstrates that we're OK with the wealthy kids just playing with Daddy's money: Why work rich kid, people will hate you either way, right?
EDIT: DAGS90 stated that Paris Hilton was a bad example and I really don't care enough to look into it to see if he's right about that (I feel that Paris is rich because she inherited money and is making money now because she's famous for being rich/famous, not for an achievement but I could be wrong) The point was a rich person and Paris just came off the top of my head but I have changed it to generic rich kid just in case he's correct and Paris isn't THAT bad of a person...