And
Cheeze_Pavilion said:
Citrus Insanity said:
Aschenkatza said:
My bias is that people drink illegally because they aren't allowed. People want what they can't have. If we got rid of the law[or lowered it], no one would care to drink because it's no longer a rebellious thing.
As many have said and many will say, "Why can I choose to die for my country, yet not be allowed to drink?"
I agree with this. The legal drinking age in Germany is 16, and you don't hear about any problems coming out of it.
Mass transit in Germany is much, much better than it is in America. That's why you don't hear of as many problems: the drinking age was raised because of the number of traffic accidents related to alcohol and young drivers, and Americans live in much less dense settlement patterns than the people of Germany.
Bull. Mass transit has nothing to do with it. Canada is much, MUCH less densely populated than the U.S., yet they get along fine being able to drink at 18.
The fact of the matter is that almost every other country gets along just fine with the drinking age at less than 21, and even less than 18 in some cases. Even with the higher age limit here, our teens are still the ones stereotyped for stupid behavior worldwide. It teaches adolescents to chug/mainline/funnel their alcohol so they don't get caught with any, thereby enforcing really bad drinking habits.
I agree that lowering it now would cause a few months (3? 6? a year?) of insanity, but the novelty would wear off quickly. The rest of the world isn't going to fall in behind our "stellar" example, so why are we still punishing our teens?