So how are you Londoners not terrified of the Met yet?

Recommended Videos

BubbleGumSnareDrum

New member
Dec 24, 2008
643
0
0
Seriously, I thought it wasn't safe to trust police in the states, how can you guys possibly feel safe? I love London and would actually be pretty happy to live there some day, but your government and law enforcement are very unsettling.
 

Lord George

New member
Aug 25, 2008
2,734
0
0
The police can't do much having very little power nowadays, though they did contain the G20 summit quite well. Still I'd be more afraid of American cops who seem to frequently arrest and taser for people for petty or non existent reasons.
 

Vern

New member
Sep 19, 2008
1,302
0
0
Well, British cops do the same, although American police are more heavy handed about it. I'd be more concerned with the CCTV and the fact that city councils are recruiting 7 year olds to spy on their neighbors. INGSOC would be double plus proud.
 

JJDWilson

New member
Feb 25, 2008
100
0
0
The rediculous amount by which the Police are restricted and any infraction that causes physical harm scares me.

As for the guy killed during the riots. The copper happened to shake the blockage into just the wrong place. It would have happened naturally in time anyway.
 

Ironic

New member
Sep 30, 2008
488
0
0
A) He means a couple frustrated cops angered by recent strikes/pay issues that pushed over that guy (who had a heart condition, very unfortunate) / beat that lady in the face.

B) He means the guy that was shot in the back of the head because he ran and jumped the barrier, on the same day that police had intel that a bomber WAS coming, after people were still feeling aftershocks from the underground bombings.

C) He's afraid of the titty-helmet. This point is wrong, we are all afraid of the titty-helmet
 

A13X T3h NubCak3

New member
May 12, 2009
75
0
0
he died because he was fat not because a cop killed him.. its just like sending someone to jail for pushing someone over then in the next couple of hours he dies from a heart attack.... wait thats what happened :p
 

Player 2

New member
Feb 20, 2009
739
0
0
Ironic said:
C) He's afraid of the titty-helmet. This point is wrong, we are all afraid of the titty-helmet
I broke somebody's nose with one of those titty-helmets once, they're deadly weapons.
 

iain62a

New member
Oct 9, 2008
815
0
0
I'd rather excessive surveillance than excessive crime.

However, London has both.

It's harmless though, if you haven't done anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about.
 

jebussaves88

New member
May 4, 2008
1,395
0
0
The only thing I fear in London is being mugged or beaten up outside a pub.

Why, what have you heard?
 

BubbleGumSnareDrum

New member
Dec 24, 2008
643
0
0
iain62a said:
It's harmless though, if you haven't done anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about.
This is the excuse neo-conservatives use constantly in the states to justify the possibility of phonetapping and any other surveillance made on our people. I don't buy it here and I wouldn't buy it in London, either. Surveillance doesn't prevent crime, it only proves that it happened, and when it comes to violent crime (the crime that really matters) there is always a victim, a witness, and evidence that will all sufficiently prove the crime, assuming it actually happened.

And all of you are forgetting about that serial rapist who went unhalted by the Met for years, sexually assaulting/raping dozens of womens in the process, and was only just arrested, what, last month?
 

Ironic

New member
Sep 30, 2008
488
0
0
jedstopher said:
Ironic said:
C) He's afraid of the titty-helmet. This point is wrong, we are all afraid of the titty-helmet
I broke somebody's nose with one of those titty-helmets once, they're deadly weapons.
I love how they haven't scrapped the law that a pregnant woman is allowed to ask a policeman wearing a titty-helmet to give her his helmet to pee in. I hope he doesn't have to wear it immediately afterwards :/
 

Gooble

New member
May 9, 2008
1,158
0
0
JJDWilson said:
The rediculous amount by which the Police are restricted and any infraction that causes physical harm scares me.

As for the guy killed during the riots. The copper happened to shake the blockage into just the wrong place. It would have happened naturally in time anyway.
A13X T3h NubCak3 said:
he died because he was fat not because a cop killed him.. its just like sending someone to jail for pushing someone over then in the next couple of hours he dies from a heart attack.... wait thats what happened :p
You guys are aware that he didnt die of a heart attack...an independent (i.e. non-police appointed) post mortem showed he died of internal bleeding.

On the main issue, admittedly the police over-reacted, but 3 policeman acting out, out of several hundred should not be a major concern for people.
 

Danny Ocean

Master Archivist
Jun 28, 2008
4,148
0
0
Gooble said:
You guys are aware that he didnt die of a heart attack...an independent (i.e. non-police appointed) post mortem showed he died of internal bleeding.
Citation?
 

Spirultima

New member
Jul 25, 2008
1,464
0
0
Were English you see

As Winston Churchill once said during WWII "keep calm and carry on", t'is an English tradition to carry life on as normal during catastrophes, and simply hope your not "that unlucky bastard".