Diablo's roots had you in a constant state of descent. It gave you the impression that, yeah I'm getting closer to my goal because I'm getting closer to hell. Diablo now is about running through a jungle hitting tiny pigmy guys out of the way with your summoned minions.Pyronox said:Qftguess who said:As much as I loved the first Diablo and thought the second one was ok I know that this one will suck, they have strayed too far from the gothic horror roots, it wouldn't be bad if they had not called it a Diablo game and made it it's own setting.
And?Fightgarr said:Diablo's roots had you in a constant state of descent. It gave you the impression that, yeah I'm getting closer to my goal because I'm getting closer to hell. Diablo now is about running through a jungle hitting tiny pigmy guys out of the way with your summoned minions.Pyronox said:Qftguess who said:As much as I loved the first Diablo and thought the second one was ok I know that this one will suck, they have strayed too far from the gothic horror roots, it wouldn't be bad if they had not called it a Diablo game and made it it's own setting.
That pigmy slaughter was good fun. The first Diablo had a good premise but the only difference in environments were either more/less blood, gore, red, staircases, cast metal, etc. Diablo 2 at LEAST had you in smorgasbord of dungeon motifs.Fightgarr said:Diablo's roots had you in a constant state of descent. It gave you the impression that, yeah I'm getting closer to my goal because I'm getting closer to hell. Diablo now is about running through a jungle hitting tiny pigmy guys out of the way with your summoned minions.Pyronox said:Qftguess who said:As much as I loved the first Diablo and thought the second one was ok I know that this one will suck, they have strayed too far from the gothic horror roots, it wouldn't be bad if they had not called it a Diablo game and made it it's own setting.