Deus Ex Machina is a too-easy un-foreshadowed solution to the plot that occurs at the end of a story. Now while I feel like most people understand what Deus Ex Machina is and when it is used I feel like people are a little to quick to call Deus Ex Machina, even when they shouldn't be.
For Example: Mass Effect 3
Many people's criticize Mass Effect 3 by saying that the Crucible is Deus Ex Machina when simply that isn't that case. The Crucible is foreshadowed in Lair of the Shadow Broker, isn't easy to build and you find out about the Crucible a the starting of Mass Effect 3. A Deus Ex Machina would be if at the end of Mass Effect 3 you discovered that the Reapers were deathly allergic to cream cheese and you used that to defeat them. It wouldn't make sense unless in Mass Effect 1 this dairy related weakness was hinted at.
Sure the above example may not be A+ writing but it isn't Deus Ex Machina.
Any questions, comments, rebuttals or other examples of things unjustly accused of Deus Ex Machina?
PS: I apologize to any Cream-Cheese theory believers who have yet to finish ME3.
For Example: Mass Effect 3
Many people's criticize Mass Effect 3 by saying that the Crucible is Deus Ex Machina when simply that isn't that case. The Crucible is foreshadowed in Lair of the Shadow Broker, isn't easy to build and you find out about the Crucible a the starting of Mass Effect 3. A Deus Ex Machina would be if at the end of Mass Effect 3 you discovered that the Reapers were deathly allergic to cream cheese and you used that to defeat them. It wouldn't make sense unless in Mass Effect 1 this dairy related weakness was hinted at.
Sure the above example may not be A+ writing but it isn't Deus Ex Machina.
Any questions, comments, rebuttals or other examples of things unjustly accused of Deus Ex Machina?
PS: I apologize to any Cream-Cheese theory believers who have yet to finish ME3.