Or maybe just get his driver to go down the right street!Kingsman said:How about stop Franz Ferdinand from ever leaving his house?
I was going to say that, but you beat me to the punch.The Unworthy Gentleman said:Kill Kaiser Wilhelm.
There is no WW1; there is no Treaty of Versailles; there is no economic turmoil in Germany; there is no WW2.
what about Mussolini, or the part of the war in the east?The87Italians said:Shoot Hitler. Did I win?
doesnt that mean Austria will have to go to war with russia and France?The Unworthy Gentleman said:Kill Kaiser Wilhelm.
There is no WW1; there is no Treaty of Versailles; there is no economic turmoil in Germany; there is no WW2.
This, and failing that, ensure that France has as little a role in the Treaty Negotiations as possible. Stops them bitterly screwing germany over for land and debts.The Unworthy Gentleman said:Kill Kaiser Wilhelm.
There is no WW1; there is no Treaty of Versailles; there is no economic turmoil in Germany; there is no WW2.
Dont you see If he is dead then Bismark stays in control and germany's relationship with russia stays okay.Elcarsh said:Oh yes, because the murder of the arch-duke of Austro-Hungary did such wonders for the political stability in the world, what harm could it possibly do to assassinate another, even more important, european leader?The Unworthy Gentleman said:Kill Kaiser Wilhelm.
There is no WW1; there is no Treaty of Versailles; there is no economic turmoil in Germany; there is no WW2.
People need to read up on the subject before making shit like this up. Both world wars were based on structural issues that couldn't possibly have been resolved by single actions on any party. They were absolutely inevitable, and it's idiotic to think that one more high-profile political murder would have made all those issues go away.
Nuke everyonezombie711 said:stop WWII in as few steps as possible that includes the war in the pacific as well as in europe.
you can do anything that was possible at the time, but only what you as a person could do.