Take 3 games...
- Thread starter -Drifter-
- Start date
Recommended Videos
This is surprisingly hard because a lot of modern games are, or try to be, a combination of genres. Instead of choosing 3 great games I like, I probably would go with something completely outrageous:
Plug in the blender, throw in:
Saints Row/Bully/Early GTA -like open world gameplay BUT the setting would be the European Scramble for Africa during the late 19th and early 20th century. The protagonist would be a priest of the country you can choose from and the basic object would be to turn the local people into christians. I don't know if this is historically accurate, but it's not necessary. Also, morality would be a must-have cliche. Think of the context the system would be put in! The overall atmosphere would be over-the-top humoristic.
Second game would be Spyro The Dragon or Crash Bandicoot. Combined with the first game, for example after certain amount of bibles given, your BIBLEMETER would fill and give you wings of angel/demon, depending on the your good christian/bad christian choices you have made. Again, these choices would not be defined by modern standards. This would give the game some platforming sections in which to utilize flying or some other tricks and access some new areas.
Third nail in the cro... I'm sorry. The third game would naturally be some real-time strategy game. This would bring missions where you would have to manage your funds and spread your nuns over the new areas to preach, build new churches in new villages, explore the unknown etc.
The game would be called "Crusades of the Cross: Conquer and Liberate" and would bring a controversy storm you have never seen before
Plug in the blender, throw in:
Saints Row/Bully/Early GTA -like open world gameplay BUT the setting would be the European Scramble for Africa during the late 19th and early 20th century. The protagonist would be a priest of the country you can choose from and the basic object would be to turn the local people into christians. I don't know if this is historically accurate, but it's not necessary. Also, morality would be a must-have cliche. Think of the context the system would be put in! The overall atmosphere would be over-the-top humoristic.
Second game would be Spyro The Dragon or Crash Bandicoot. Combined with the first game, for example after certain amount of bibles given, your BIBLEMETER would fill and give you wings of angel/demon, depending on the your good christian/bad christian choices you have made. Again, these choices would not be defined by modern standards. This would give the game some platforming sections in which to utilize flying or some other tricks and access some new areas.
Third nail in the cro... I'm sorry. The third game would naturally be some real-time strategy game. This would bring missions where you would have to manage your funds and spread your nuns over the new areas to preach, build new churches in new villages, explore the unknown etc.
The game would be called "Crusades of the Cross: Conquer and Liberate" and would bring a controversy storm you have never seen before
KotOR, Starcraft, and Age of Empires.
A Star Wars RTS/RPG hybrid (Similar to a Star Wars Warcraft 3) with age upgrades.
You start out with measly troopers with no armor, upgrade to storm troopers/clones, upgrade to something else, upgrade to jedi/sith.
It would be awesome.
A Star Wars RTS/RPG hybrid (Similar to a Star Wars Warcraft 3) with age upgrades.
You start out with measly troopers with no armor, upgrade to storm troopers/clones, upgrade to something else, upgrade to jedi/sith.
It would be awesome.
have you played empire at war? that's a pretty decent starwars rts. the space combat is awesome (if a bit unbalanced), the galactic strategy thing is pretty good. the only downside is the land combat, which kinda sucks.Radeonx said:
it's a bit more 'realistic' though, there's no instant unit training and no pulling an entire base out of your arse. you have to make do with your pre constructed bases and the units you garrisoned there in defense, and with the troops you brought with you on offense. there's no real rpg elements though, but being able to rip shit up with superstar destroyers makes up for that.
but.... how the hell does upgrading clone troopers to jedi work? that makes absolutely no sense at all!
KOTOR, Metal Gear Solid, and Jet Set Radio Future.
Add them together and you get:
Jet Wars: Gears of the Metal Future
Actually that really does sound kind of awesome to me.
Add them together and you get:
Jet Wars: Gears of the Metal Future
Actually that really does sound kind of awesome to me.
Killing Floor, one of those Berserk games and God Of War.
Essentially you play Gutts killing a bunch of specimen and getting dosh to upgrade stuff like your speed, damage and shit like that. You can choose to individual limbs to upgrade. At the end of each level you fight some big ass guy.
OH! And it has 3 player co-op where two people can join as Griffith and Caska.
Essentially you play Gutts killing a bunch of specimen and getting dosh to upgrade stuff like your speed, damage and shit like that. You can choose to individual limbs to upgrade. At the end of each level you fight some big ass guy.
OH! And it has 3 player co-op where two people can join as Griffith and Caska.
The euphoria engine of GTA 4 fame along with the open world New York clone. Fort Zombie's enter-able buildings, scavenging system (though altered a bit), and survivors. Lastly the makeshift weapons and the shear numbers of zombies in the Dead Rising games, Wii excluded . I love zombie and survival games. The zombie survival genre tends to be disappointing though because it's more accurately described as zombie defense.
. I love zombie and survival games. The zombie survival genre tends to be disappointing though because it's more accurately described as zombie defense.
Assassin's Creed, Portal, Half-Life 2: two main factions- the Combine and Aperture Science- are vying for control of City 17; Aperture-controlled ares have all those awesome panels, and Combine-controlled areas are all bleak, industrial hellholes, but really, the main draw is that not only can you perform crazy acrobatics with the portal gun, but you can also stab people at the same time.
Also, swan-diving off of buildings (even the Citadel!) would be a lot more fun if you enter a portal and go rocketing across half the city.
Also, swan-diving off of buildings (even the Citadel!) would be a lot more fun if you enter a portal and go rocketing across half the city.
I'd like to see an MMOFPS of a combination of A Tale in the Desert, Minecraft, and Planetside
You start the game at the edge of the wilderness as a blank slate with no attachments. You're given a blank diary, a pistol with five rounds, and a sleeping bag. From there, you do as you please. If you die, you have to make a new character. The only exception to this if you've built a medical building which gives you a supply of lives. Upgrade the building for more lives.
You can store weapons and supplies in bases or warehouses which you also have the build. Otherwise you just carry everything on your back. You can build garages for vehicles, and bunkers for defense. You can build and lay traps such as landmines, or dig trenches and fox holes.
You can join groups. The only groups are ones made by players. Leaving is easy. Joining is easy. There's nothing to mark that you're in a group except what the group decides to mark them as. This could be a tabard if you want. People can fake these tabards though to fool other people. The benefits of groups is the sharing of buildings. Groups can form alliances. Friendly fire is never on, and you're never told upon death the name of the person who killed you.
The world is divided into territories. To control a territory, you have to be the only one with buildings in that region. Otherwise it's contested. Control them all, and the game restarts with a newly generated world. The location of resources would be determined by seeds. The conquerors aren't rewarded. Conquering the world isn't the point. If you want to spend the entire game putting landmines on a road and watching from the distance through binoculars, you can. If you want to travel the world as a mercenary or engineer selling their services, you can.
Your diary records yours and other people's experiences. You can collect other people's diaries by sharing or just killing them and taking it. Through this, the history of the world is written. For ease in cataloging, when 10 or more players from two or more groups fight, it's considered a skirmish. Three skirmishes equal a battle. Three or more battles equal a war. These are recorded. The names of the dead are recorded. As are the completion of buildings and historic discoveries.
No NPCs, no grand story to drive you along, minimal backstory. The small amount of backstory would be told through the game's environments. Abandoned cities in ruins, mass graves, radiation, and craters. These would be recorded in your diary when you find them.
Basically, the entire game encourages players to be a dick. Killing other players, sabotaging their stuff, creating anarchy isn't just encouraged, it's rewarded. You have to constantly balance your ambitions with those of other players. You have to consider who you can and can't trust.
You start the game at the edge of the wilderness as a blank slate with no attachments. You're given a blank diary, a pistol with five rounds, and a sleeping bag. From there, you do as you please. If you die, you have to make a new character. The only exception to this if you've built a medical building which gives you a supply of lives. Upgrade the building for more lives.
You can store weapons and supplies in bases or warehouses which you also have the build. Otherwise you just carry everything on your back. You can build garages for vehicles, and bunkers for defense. You can build and lay traps such as landmines, or dig trenches and fox holes.
You can join groups. The only groups are ones made by players. Leaving is easy. Joining is easy. There's nothing to mark that you're in a group except what the group decides to mark them as. This could be a tabard if you want. People can fake these tabards though to fool other people. The benefits of groups is the sharing of buildings. Groups can form alliances. Friendly fire is never on, and you're never told upon death the name of the person who killed you.
The world is divided into territories. To control a territory, you have to be the only one with buildings in that region. Otherwise it's contested. Control them all, and the game restarts with a newly generated world. The location of resources would be determined by seeds. The conquerors aren't rewarded. Conquering the world isn't the point. If you want to spend the entire game putting landmines on a road and watching from the distance through binoculars, you can. If you want to travel the world as a mercenary or engineer selling their services, you can.
Your diary records yours and other people's experiences. You can collect other people's diaries by sharing or just killing them and taking it. Through this, the history of the world is written. For ease in cataloging, when 10 or more players from two or more groups fight, it's considered a skirmish. Three skirmishes equal a battle. Three or more battles equal a war. These are recorded. The names of the dead are recorded. As are the completion of buildings and historic discoveries.
No NPCs, no grand story to drive you along, minimal backstory. The small amount of backstory would be told through the game's environments. Abandoned cities in ruins, mass graves, radiation, and craters. These would be recorded in your diary when you find them.
Basically, the entire game encourages players to be a dick. Killing other players, sabotaging their stuff, creating anarchy isn't just encouraged, it's rewarded. You have to constantly balance your ambitions with those of other players. You have to consider who you can and can't trust.
Hitman + Pokemon + Rapelay
You'd stealthily sneak through the various areas of the game, disguising yourself as you capture women forcing them in to tiny balls, then after training them in the sexual arts you take them to an underground tournamant where you make them fight other captured women for fame and cash prizes... Man I've got issues.
You'd stealthily sneak through the various areas of the game, disguising yourself as you capture women forcing them in to tiny balls, then after training them in the sexual arts you take them to an underground tournamant where you make them fight other captured women for fame and cash prizes... Man I've got issues.
Assassins creed+ Metal Gear Solid+ Okami=....An open world stealth game, with a crazy story that won't make sense until the final one, while having, stylish graphics. Unique game play, and charming characters. Damn I wish that would come true.