Thanks for posting spoilers of the latest dr who on the front page

[trymantha]

so yeah having the subtitle of an article being

"One more death would've dramatically improved "Closing Time.""

with the title being

"Doctor Who: Let?s Kill Craig"

So know i know some one dies, and who its not.

THAKS GUYS I love it when people ruin shows I havent watched yet.


Good thinking. really top notch

 

[genericusername64]

and someone spoiled who the killer was for me in heavy rain, get over it.

 

[MurderousToaster]

You consider that the total ruination of a show?

Seriously?

That'd actually make me want to watch it more to see who dies. Not just that, but the whole "SPOILERTH!" thing is ridiculous. It's not what happens, it's the how, why and what happened up until that point.

 

[trymantha]

this is meant to be a professional news site they should know to keep things like this off the front page

 

[Yoshisummons]

Guess what,
Dumbledore dies.

Spoiler

spell check thinks Dumbledore is Dumbwaiter. What?

If you are so concerned about being spoiled on the new episode don't hang around areas will talk about it until you go watch it yourself. This is a two way street, where we have to balance between the wants of things to not be spoiled, and to discuss the topic at full length.

 

[Doc Theta Sigma]

this is meant to be a professional news site they should know to keep things like this off the front page

... You're kidding right?

 

[trymantha]

i dont mind people discussing it but try to keep it of the main page.

I live in New Zealand, where we cant access any decent streaming sites and we are not yet up to that episode so avoiding site like this till ive seen it means say of these sites for a couple of months

 

[Magicmad5511]

I realise that this is a rant and you are just annoyed but you could get busted for lack of discussion value.

Anyway, if the Title was "Doctor Who: Let's Kill Craig" then you must have clicked on it to view the subtitle. If your trying to avoid spoilers then you don't click on topics to do with it. Don't blame us because you chose to look at it.

 

[trymantha]

this is meant to be a professional news site they should know to keep things like this off the front page

... You're kidding right?

if by kidding you mean i have heavy air quotes around the word "professional" then yes im kidding

I realise that this is a rant and you are just annoyed but you could get busted for lack of discussion value.

Anyway, if the Title was "Doctor Who: Let's Kill Craig" then you must have clicked on it to view the subtitle. If your trying to avoid spoilers then you don't click on topics to do with it. Don't blame us because you chose to look at it.

no go to the front page, its under the videos in the part with all the squares and it displays the subtitle there, i haven't opened it nor will i till ive seen the episode in question

 

[Erana]

OK, so you found out there's a death in the show. You don't even know if it actually is this "Craig" person who died.
And why haven't you seen this episode already if you're a dr. Who fan?

How about you send Susan a PM suggesting that in future articles, she be more careful with her Doctor Who article titles? This is her first of such a column, I believe.

Spamming threads on the forums doesn't do anything but look like you're throwing a fit and only inconveniences the volunteer community moderators.

 

[ShindoL Shill]

this is meant to be a professional news site they should know to keep things like this off the front page

so a website oriented to, lets face it, nerds (by the standard stereotype) should keep articles about the things people like to talk about off the front page?
what would be the point of the forums then, if we arent allowed to have articles about the things we like.

and it was a what-if. it didnt spoil anything.

 

[trymantha]

OK, so you found out there's a death in the show. You don't even know if it actually is this "Craig" person who died.
And why haven't you seen this episode already if you're a dr. Who fan?

How about you send Susan a PM suggesting that in future articles, she be more careful with her Doctor Who article titles? This is her first of such a column, I believe.

Spamming threads on the forums doesn't do anything but look like you're throwing a fit and only inconveniences the volunteer community moderators.

yes i might not be handling this is the best way i don't come to these forums often,

i have already stated why i have not watched the episode, i live in NZ where they air them delayed and as a country we are blocked to a vast majority of the streaming sites


EDIT: Craig is obviously the character that was introduced in last season's episode the lodger who they had already confirmed was coming back in a episode this season

 

[TheRightToArmBears]

I could point some glaring problem with you claiming it spoiled it for you, but then I would spoil it more. So unfortunately all I can suggest is fabulous drugs to make you forget. watching the episode as soon as you can.

 

[ReservoirAngel]

I've learnt never to trust Doctor Who spoilers. 95% of the time the spoilers are just nerds making up what they want to happen or think should happen.

Honest to God, before Matt Smith started as the Doctor I saw many sites claiming "exclusive news" that in his 1st episode he would be killed and regenerate into David Tennant.

But I can understand your frustration.