This is my first post forum thing, horray for me!
What I want to bring to the dinner table of deep thinking is this;
Towards the end of last year going to your local GAME store was special because in the top 20 games for sale you'll be hard-pressed to find a game that didn't end with a 2,3 or 4 in the title. Almost every game was a remake(or sequel) of something done about a year before. Now It's hard to resist the fanboy allure of playing the remakes(or sequels) so I bought every game under the sun and masturbated all over them (in a manner of speaking). But I want to know what people from across the world think.
Should the game developers have thought of different games all together?
Did you think any particular 'game remakes'(or 'game sequels') were better or worse than the originals?
Voice your opinion while I blow up an oil rig in Mercenaries2, again.
What I want to bring to the dinner table of deep thinking is this;
Towards the end of last year going to your local GAME store was special because in the top 20 games for sale you'll be hard-pressed to find a game that didn't end with a 2,3 or 4 in the title. Almost every game was a remake(or sequel) of something done about a year before. Now It's hard to resist the fanboy allure of playing the remakes(or sequels) so I bought every game under the sun and masturbated all over them (in a manner of speaking). But I want to know what people from across the world think.
Should the game developers have thought of different games all together?
Did you think any particular 'game remakes'(or 'game sequels') were better or worse than the originals?
Voice your opinion while I blow up an oil rig in Mercenaries2, again.