McWipp said:
Yes, you can sometimes equip things to the left hand, but it's always the "off-hand" or "shield" hand.
Why is it any less important than being able to be black, or female, or male, or purple? I'm left handed, I differ from most people, I wish to be able to emulate myself into a video game world. It's not important in that, it doesn't change a character's personality. But in rpgs that are supposed to be about immersion, it's jarring to see always right handed people that are supposed to be "me".
Normally I'd just dismiss this as something like I said before, but let me elaborate on this:
If we took the population of persons in the world who would play a game that has high customization and allows to choose dominant (or no dominant) hand as some number
g presumably larger than the entire population of people who are left-handed (represented by
L) but still vastly smaller than 100% minus
L, then it is possible that you are the only person in the entire community of people who would play said in-depth game (two notes here: 1) nobody else who would play said game say you are left-handed; I don't care 2) this excludes sports games by default, since that is highly relevant to many sports and sports games are not particularly immersive (outside of how immersive any game can be expected to be)). Conversely it is possible that the entire
L could be contained within
g and result in a substantial portion of people in
g. But, assuming that
g is a large enough sample to reflect the incidental traits of the larger human population, then "most" people would not be left-handed and this would be an incidental trait itself in
g, not necessary to factor in by itself.
Yes- as a factor of immersion- this does bring that down for the portion of
L within
g which is (as I said before) incidental, because I can't imagine that all the people in the party of
L /
g would be concerned with that particular factor.
But, as for the necessity of it as an immersion factor, the video game industry can- essentailly- ignore that small demographic of people (
L - who doesn't care + any random righties who care) /
g since it is incidental, at best.
Although if they did want to claim to be (as close as one can get to) to fully customizable, then they would need to include that sort of thing.