We Finns don't have to go to the army when we're eighteen (we don't HAVE to go there at all). We can go there later, we just have to go there when we are 18-25 (if we go). Then there's the... Well, I don't know what it is in english, but we can get a job somewhere and do that, but it kinda sucks now because it's usually always quite longer than the army.Rhayn said:Conscription in Finland. Every 18 year-old man has to go through at least half a year of military service. Supposedly this is due to our proximity to Russia, but as of late the government has started to understand we've got nothing of importance to Russia, so invasion is highly unlikely. In a few years conscription will likely be dropped in favor of voluntary service.
That of course means that I, being 18 years old, am going to serve my time next summer. Hoping to get into the navy.
SadakoMoose said:In America it's either for heritage or economic disadvantage.
Due to recent economic troubles, many of current recruits are from lower income families, and didn't go to University. They can't find jobs anywhere else.
Other people do it, because their family line is nothing but soldiers and theyve been raised to think it's their destiny or something.
One major demographic shift in the armed services of the US, are the changing target audience of PMC (Private Military Contractor) firms. Before Iraq, and the rise of Blackwater, your typical mercenary was either an ex military man, or an adventure seeking nutter. Old guard mercs that you heard about in Soldier of Fortune magazine.
Nowadays, Blackwater (Xi) uses a brilliant strategy of appealing to patriotism and other such ideals in order to persuade people to sign up. Were seeing a big upswing in the number of recruits that had previously been backwoods militiamen, and other such people.
Your word choices (UK English) tell me you're speaking about the American military from an outside perspective. I therefore take great pleasure in telling you that you're stunningly wrong. There are all kinds of reasons people volunteer for military service. I have a buddy for instance who is a full-on bromosapien. He just wants to hit the gym and waterski and skydive and do all that life-affirming stuff. The Air Force was a job where he'd spend his time surrounded by a much higher proportion of like-minded young men than he would have in the corporate world. He'll also retire with full pension at age 38, still young enough to pick up a second career with his aviation experience.SadakoMoose said:In America it's either for heritage or economic disadvantage.
Due to recent economic troubles, many of current recruits are from lower income families, and didn't go to University. They can't find jobs anywhere else.
Other people do it, because their family line is nothing but soldiers and theyve been raised to think it's their destiny or something.
One major demographic shift in the armed services of the US, are the changing target audience of PMC (Private Military Contractor) firms. Before Iraq, and the rise of Blackwater, your typical mercenary was either an ex military man, or an adventure seeking nutter. Old guard mercs that you heard about in Soldier of Fortune magazine.
Nowadays, Blackwater (Xi) uses a brilliant strategy of appealing to patriotism and other such ideals in order to persuade people to sign up. Were seeing a big upswing in the number of recruits that had previously been backwoods militiamen, and other such people.
Sadly though, this almost never happens!. If we were to use a carpet bombing strategy against the enemy, the most likely and common outcome will be the enemy using the massive civilian casualties and infrastructure loss (that inevitably happens with carpet bombing) as a cause to recruit more for their side and cause.jasoncyrus said:Finally someone whos willing to debate and point out things that matter, Thank you sir, it is *much* appreciated.
As I said earlier carpet bombing was mainly for scaremongering to encite the population to betray their military forces or whatever and help the occupiers in weeding them out.
But to continue the tumor analogue. It's not a single cancerous area, its more like single cell cancer or micro tumors. Hard to spot and extremely difficult and time consuming to remove with precision.