Total War: Shogun 2, Your Thoughts please

Recommended Videos

Imperioratorex Caprae

Henchgoat Emperor
May 15, 2010
5,499
0
0
Just picked this game up for 8 bucks through Gamestop's DD platform (don't make this a flame war thread on DD platforms) and downloaded it (through Steam, but thats for another topic at some point).
What I want to know is those of you who are into the Total War series is how you like it and if you mod it, and if yes what mods do you prefer?
I've played Medieval: Total War and have the Westeros mod for it (which i feel is super awesome).
Also side note, have any of you messed with the TeD modding kit that comes with Shogun 2?

Captcha: how interesting
Lord Inglip, are you trying to say "cool story bro"?
 

LetalisK

New member
May 5, 2010
2,769
0
0
Honestly, it bored me. Each faction has their little perks, but there is much less to differentiate each faction than with other games in the series like Empire and Medieval 2. This battle, same as the last.
 

BloatedGuppy

New member
Feb 3, 2010
9,572
0
0
LetalisK said:
Honestly, it bored me. Each faction has their little perks, but there is much less to differentiate each faction than with other games in the series like Empire and Medieval 2. This battle, same as the last.
Same here. Everything about it left me cold. Lacked all the complexity and character that made Medieval 2 and Rome so memorable. Pretty game, runs beautifully, has no soul.
 

The Knightly Gamer

New member
Jan 5, 2011
176
0
0
Im going to have to disagree with the other posters. I think S:TW 2 was really good. Now yes the factions have the "same units" but that means your tactics must be better if you want to win you just cant over power your enemies with your nation "super unit". Also the general's skill tree is great. No more random traits for you generals. I think your going to get as much fun as you are open to the time period.
 

Lokoloshe

New member
Nov 8, 2010
70
0
0
The Knightly Gamer said:
Im going to have to disagree with the other posters. I think S:TW 2 was really good. Now yes the factions have the "same units" but that means your tactics must be better if you want to win you just cant over power your enemies with your nation "super unit". Also the general's skill tree is grea. No more random traits for you generals. I think your going to get as much fun as you are open to the time period.
Completely agree. I'm not too fond of the naval battles though so I'd generally built huge navies and auto-resolve. I've been playing the Total War series since the original Shogun so I may be biased by a bit of nostalgia but as the saying goes, sometimes less is more.
 

SckizoBoy

Ineptly Chaotic
Legacy
Jan 6, 2011
8,681
200
68
A Hermit's Cave
Eh... twas OK.

Gameplay was nothing big, here's a battle, there's a battle, story wasn't particularly engaging, a bit of RP'ing and character trait choices. However, looked absolutely stunning...

Then I went back to Napoleon: Total War... yes, I know... the heresy...(!)
 

idarkphoenixi

New member
May 2, 2011
1,492
0
0
They simplified it a lot to appeal to a wider audience. I'm not saying that was a terrible move but there was little to no unit variety between factions. Each faction simply had a slightly better version of what everyone else had but nothing so exclusive that it sets them apart from the rest.

Other that that I didn't have too many problems. Other than the ridiculous load times of course, seriously it takes me like 5minutes to load a simple battle and I have a good pc on medium specs.
 

kingthrall

New member
May 31, 2011
811
0
0
I refused to buy shogun 2 simply because it was a step backwars in total war games.

I mean its just Japan so you have limited more or less the same army types with a few variants. They really should of done a Mongolian total war or at least an asia total war but just Japan annoys me.

I was also annoyed that they never bothered to fix empire total war and the Darthmod had to do all the work just to get the infantry and cavalry fighting reasonably well which is unacceptable.
 

Iyon

Recovering Lurker
May 16, 2012
106
0
0
I'll have to agree with most of the other posters and say I quickly got bored of it. I really enjoyed it though and had some pretty epic battles.

Though it's been a while since I played it I swear sometimes I can still hear, "Our men are running from the battlefield! Shameful display!"
 

The Madman

New member
Dec 7, 2007
4,404
0
0
It's good, not my favourite but good nonetheless. As it's only Japan involved this time there much less unit diversity or sense of scale than you might get from a game like Medieval 2, Rome or Empire but if you've a fondness for the Japanese style and setting there's more than enough to keep you entertained.

The game is absolutely gorgeous as well. The in-game graphics, UI, art style, music, and everything else involved in the presentation side of things is top-notch. And perhaps because there's less diversity the battles are smooth and entertaining as well right from the start. Probably the least buggy Total War game to date.

Don't know anything about mods however. Sadly the last really heavily moddable game in the Total War series was Medieval 2, every game since then has gotten steadily less and less modder friendly.
 

Ryotknife

New member
Oct 15, 2011
1,687
0
0
I will let you know if i ever make it past turn 10........

every game starts in two possible ways. Either 3 AI immediately declar war against me and march an army 5 times bigger than mine within the first few turns, or i actually manage to take one or two AI out after rush building an army (and then concentrate on economy) only to have one of the conquered AI neighbors declare war against me fielding an army vastly greater than i could ever possibly support despite the fact that the AI has ONE territory and i have a greater economy.
 

Kargathia

New member
Jul 16, 2009
1,657
0
0
As more posters have noted: the campaign mode lacks diversity. To date I've spent a lot less time on Shogun's campaign than on any previous campaign mode.

This, however, was in my opinion more than compensated by that the multiplayer is downright excellent, and remarkably balanced. Having to manage your army and veterans between battles - and thus slowly building your perfect setup - adds a lot of depth to the game, and makes for some truly interesting battles.
Sadly it also makes the campaign even less interesting, as the AI - despite drastic improvements - still fights very predictably.
 

Ryotknife

New member
Oct 15, 2011
1,687
0
0
imahobbit4062 said:
Ryotknife said:
I will let you know if i ever make it past turn 10........

every game starts in two possible ways. Either 3 AI immediately declar war against me and march an army 5 times bigger than mine within the first few turns, or i actually manage to take one or two AI out after rush building an army (and then concentrate on economy) only to have one of the conquered AI neighbors declare war against me fielding an army vastly greater than i could ever possibly support despite the fact that the AI has ONE territory and i have a greater economy.
Which Clan are you playing as?
The Lower Left Clan

My friend recently got the game and wanted to play coop multiplayer. So im like...sure! Well apparently you have to create an avatar and fight in battles in order to unlock stuff or something for your army. Dunno, the whole system is confusing. ANYWAYS, my friend does some mock battles and says "oh, you just fight the AI, and once you win you can unlock units/upgrades/abilities/something."

cool, i thought. So i start one. AI opponent? LOL NOPE. Like a freakin grandmaster human opponent with a blackbelt in shogun 2 with an army of units in awesome armor while i have the equivalent of PEASANTS.

After 2 tries against opponents that have played for hundreds of hours (whereas my friend got 5 AI opponents in a row) im like, NOPE!

that game is a bigger jerk than demon souls.
 

NightHawk21

New member
Dec 8, 2010
1,273
0
0
I think its pretty fun so far. I'm in my first run of the game (a couple turns after the realm divide), and its fun. I can only really compare it to FoTS since that's the only other TW campaign I got around to playing so far, but its fun. I will say though that compared to FoTS sieges are absolutely flipped. While in FoTS I could hold my caste with like 3 gun levies against well over 400 dudes, in Shogun 2 its gets close even if I'm a little outnumbered. Its the opposite for attack sieges though. Whereas in FoTS I would lose a couple units to their wall gun infantry, in Shogun 2 I can take most castles by just ordering my 14+ archer units to rain down into the castle and decimate everyone.
 

tsb247

New member
Mar 6, 2009
1,783
0
0
I have had noting but enjoyable experiences with it. Then again, I mainly play co-op with friends. I haven't played for a month or so though since work has been getting in the way of my game time.
 

Darkmantle

New member
Oct 30, 2011
1,031
0
0
Honestly, I got bored with it really fast, there's jut not as much flavour as say Rome or medieval, very little differentiates the factions it seems.