Or they have 'good' graphics that take up 5 gig of it... that is minimum spec after all...Credge said:Want to know what I care about the most?
At least 15 GB of hard drive space
To me, this says "Hey look, we have a lot of content in our game without adding filler from 'good' graphics."
Agreed. That really makes things look ultimately very promising.Credge said:Those are fairly low specs, and they should be. Ever play AoC? The entire reason why the end game doesn't work is because you physically can't get more than 24 players into an open area without everyone on the planet lagging out. That and the content simply isn't finished.
Want to know what I care about the most?
At least 15 GB of hard drive space
To me, this says "Hey look, we have a lot of content in our game without adding filler from 'good' graphics."
I have a five-year-old computer that meets the min. specs (not the one I'm using). 2.66 Ghz P4, 1 GB RAM, 128 MB Radeon 9800. Half-Life 2, KOTOR, and Guild Wars all look great and run fine on maximum settings.AlphaWolf13 said:Oh god, Min specs must be horrible.... HORRIBLE...
Good thing I'd never touch that, it's grosssss
Also agreed!Credge said:Those are fairly low specs, and they should be. Ever play AoC? The entire reason why the end game doesn't work is because you physically can't get more than 24 players into an open area without everyone on the planet lagging out. That and the content simply isn't finished.
Want to know what I care about the most?
At least 15 GB of hard drive space
To me, this says "Hey look, we have a lot of content in our game without adding filler from 'good' graphics."
Ughhh, so what you're saying is that the "budget" for Warhammer is on par with the budget for WoW? WONDERFUL >:|Alex_P said:I have a five-year-old computer that meets the min. specs (not the one I'm using). 2.66 Ghz P4, 1 GB RAM, 128 MB Radeon 9800. Half-Life 2, KOTOR, and Guild Wars all look great and run fine on maximum settings.AlphaWolf13 said:Oh god, Min specs must be horrible.... HORRIBLE...
Good thing I'd never touch that, it's grosssss
And all three of those games look a lot nicer than the Warhammer Online screenshots we're seeing.
-- Alex
Not true, as shader 3.0 is also DX9.Alex_P said:(Pixel shader 2.0 is an annoying way of saying "DirectX 9.")
-- Alex
Yes, but shader 2.0 is still DX9, yes? -_-Theo Samaritan said:Not true, as shader 3.0 is also DX9.Alex_P said:(Pixel shader 2.0 is an annoying way of saying "DirectX 9.")
-- Alex
Umm, no? I was just commenting that they picked an annoying way to refer to it that most people wouldn't immediately understand.Khell_Sennet said:And that's a bad thing?
Knowing their M.O., I'd say that their goal is to make the most money, which is subtly different from selling to the most potential users.Khell_Sennet said:Games Workshop is nobody's lackey (unlike Bungie) and their goal is to release a game saleable to as many potential users as possible.