What about a World War One game?

Recommended Videos

Egobrain

New member
Dec 22, 2009
82
0
0
We've spent our entire childhoods fighting the Nazis. CoD, MoH, Wolfenstein.
We've played as the british, american, russian. In multiplayer we've even played as german and japanese. We've stormed Normandy a million times. And I'm bored.

So I got to thinking, what about a world war one game? Where you play as a Canadian?
Imagine it, St. Eloi, The Somme (first use of the tank), Vimy Ridge, Hill70 and Lens, Passchendaele. Those levels would be amazing.

Imagine the intro, you, a freshfaced soldier getting ready for his first time up at the front. Your Sargeant lines you up and starts to lead you from the reserve line through the communication trenches to the front line. As you march you see the bones and half hidden carcasses that poked from the trench walls, artillery fire constantly harassing you, the zing of sniper fire overhead. Your Sargeants dark humored advice droning in and out of the sounds of hell outside the safety of the trenches. Poison gas slowly creeping over the edges of the walls.

Then the levels. The pulse pounding moment you go over the wall, sprinting from crater to crater, throwing your grenades into machine gun nests before storming the enemy trenches. Gunfire and intense close quarters combat. Then when you think youve won the strongholds, the HUNS famous lightning counterattack begins and you have to set up your lewis guns and hope like hell the artillery lands on them and not you.

The oppresive environment. The sight of no mans land. Blasted earth and blasted bodies. Your comrades filled with the fatalist humor only found in a real WAR IS HELL world. The 15th Highlanders in their kilts and bagpipes, ferocious and jeering. The bravery found in farmers and teachers and students. Sacrifice of the kind you never see today.
It sounds so good in my head at least.
 

Pielikey

New member
Jul 31, 2009
1,394
0
0
Old thread is old. And nobody really knows the reason the game has never been done before.
 

Terminate421

New member
Jul 21, 2010
5,773
0
0
Bolt action guns get boring after a while, and revolvers, double barrels, and vickers won't change that either. (Trench warfare sounds strategically fun though)
 

garfoldsomeoneelse

Charming, But Stupid
Mar 22, 2009
2,908
0
0
Trench warfare with manually-cycled rifles probably doesn't kick down the door to gameplay variety, even if it were an FPS. I suppose it wouldn't be impossible to come up with a fun way to implement it, but... yeah, I won't be able to help you with that.
 

inFAMOUSCowZ

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,586
0
0
You lost me at Canadian jk
It would be a unquie game no doubt but would it play fun is the question.
 

maddawg IAJI

I prefer the term "Zomguard"
Feb 12, 2009
7,840
0
0
Because no one wants to play a soldier in a war where more people were killed by diseased then by actual fighting.

Tanks and Airplanes were still in their early stages back then, poison gas and artillery were some of the most deadly of weapons and some of the more well known battles would last months with thousands dying because their commanding officer ordered them into the barb-wired no man's land.

War just wasn't that interesting at the time.
 

Egobrain

New member
Dec 22, 2009
82
0
0
I know. I just want a ten hour movie where i fire the bullets. haha.
It wouldnt even be any fun. 15 attempts across no mans land and 14 deaths by machine guns and 18 pounders. I just think it would LOOK so great.
 

blankedboy

New member
Feb 7, 2009
5,234
0
0
Because no-one wants to hold CTRL for 5 minutes, then release, click twice, then hold CTRL for another 5 minutes.
 

Egobrain

New member
Dec 22, 2009
82
0
0
ShakesZX said:
So, you want to play the same old game, but with guns that work worse?
Exactly. Ups the level of skill required and adrendiline recieved when your rifle jams every 5th shot. But this is coming from someone who has a savings account dedicated to replacing controllers and drywall.
 

Freshman

New member
Jan 8, 2010
422
0
0
I could see it with super amazing graphics and ridiculous levels of detail on dead things. And I think it would have to be more of a story-type game then a gameplay kinda game. You could prolly squeeze something out of that, go cut some wire for a mission, then take leave, get wounded and spend some time in a hospital... or maybe play as the germans and british running around in africa. not as much trenchiness going on there, from what i understand.
 

Freshman

New member
Jan 8, 2010
422
0
0
Pielikey said:
Old thread is old. And nobody really knows the reason the game has never been done before.
New member is new. cut him some slack. Besides, not like the thread was done yesterday.
 

Kollega

New member
Jun 5, 2009
5,161
0
0
Egobrain said:
I know. I just want a ten hour movie where i fire the bullets. haha.
It wouldnt even be any fun. 15 attempts across no mans land and 14 deaths by machine guns and 18 pounders. I just think it would LOOK so great.
Yeah sure, it'd LOOK great, but it would not be any fun to play. And you'd die constantly because the battle tactics were "run straight into machine gun fire and hope it kills you quickly"... there weren't any notions about taking cover and such.

In summary: would it make a good anti-war propaganda? Yes, most certainly - it'd make GREAT anti-war propaganda. Would it make a good game? I doubt it.
 

Vek

New member
Aug 18, 2008
665
0
0
IF once could include the naval, u-boat, and air campaigns into the game, it'd be a lot more "action-packed" and "full of automatic weapons" for some.

There was plenty of fighting in WWI, though, to make an infantry-only game.

Frankly, I'd like to see a Korean War game, or a WWII game that focuses on the Italian campaign.