Today i encountered a rather alarming situation whilst at work. Being the game addict/bum i'm a 22 year old who works on a music/dvd/computer game department in a supermarket in my hometown.
So you have the setting in mind, i'm there, you know, lazing around, putting the occasional dvd on the shelf, while reading a game manual out of boredom (i think it was Timeshift... *shudder*), when some kid comes up to me and starts asking me if we have 'The Simpsons Game' for the ps2. We didn't. But he started a conversation about if i played games and what i was into.
So i tell him my life story about the NES and Megaman, going through the SNES and Super Metroid and StarWing (thats what StarFox was called in Europe if you think i'm talking crazy), passing through the glorious N64 years of Turok and Goldeneye to nowadays with the wii and PC gaming. This kid, though listening intently to my history lesson, didn't have a clue about any console before the N64 and Playstation... what kind of an example are parents setting these days?
At one point he even laughed when i mentioned 'Super Mario World' and he tried to correct me by stating "what do you know? its called Mario Galaxy". I just managed to quell the angry demon inside and didn't brutally smack him around the head, well he was just some random kid and i feared irate parent retribution (they'd never understand my reasons). It just got me thinking: "when i have kids they're starting on a NES with Mario 1-3, Zelda, Turtles and Tiny Toons (classic man) with some harsh and healthy doses of Megaman before they even touch a playstation 5 or current Nintendo console"
Do you think this is unfair or am i taking an important stand on the face of future gaming and protecting our past? Oh and i do realise this post makes me sound like a bit of a maniac...
So you have the setting in mind, i'm there, you know, lazing around, putting the occasional dvd on the shelf, while reading a game manual out of boredom (i think it was Timeshift... *shudder*), when some kid comes up to me and starts asking me if we have 'The Simpsons Game' for the ps2. We didn't. But he started a conversation about if i played games and what i was into.
So i tell him my life story about the NES and Megaman, going through the SNES and Super Metroid and StarWing (thats what StarFox was called in Europe if you think i'm talking crazy), passing through the glorious N64 years of Turok and Goldeneye to nowadays with the wii and PC gaming. This kid, though listening intently to my history lesson, didn't have a clue about any console before the N64 and Playstation... what kind of an example are parents setting these days?
At one point he even laughed when i mentioned 'Super Mario World' and he tried to correct me by stating "what do you know? its called Mario Galaxy". I just managed to quell the angry demon inside and didn't brutally smack him around the head, well he was just some random kid and i feared irate parent retribution (they'd never understand my reasons). It just got me thinking: "when i have kids they're starting on a NES with Mario 1-3, Zelda, Turtles and Tiny Toons (classic man) with some harsh and healthy doses of Megaman before they even touch a playstation 5 or current Nintendo console"
Do you think this is unfair or am i taking an important stand on the face of future gaming and protecting our past? Oh and i do realise this post makes me sound like a bit of a maniac...