Erana said:
You're asking to promote sexual satisfaction? I mean, yeah I hope people get healthy sex lives, but I'd rather promote healthy sexual practices, like using contraceptives, promoting a good relationship between partners, teaching about STDs, 'n the likes seems more a responsible measure to me.
Sex just seems to fall into peoples' lives these days, I don't think I need to help others get laid.
Wouldn't it be fair to say that part of sexual satisfaction would be that it's safe? I mean, granted, there will always be people who'll want sex despite the risks, but I believe the majority of the human race would stop if STDs and babies were more of a garentee if you didn't use protection. That, or they'd use protection. In any case, my point is that why can't it be both? Having safe sex means you can more readily have
more sex because you don't have some disease that'll make you an undesirable partner.
Man, I think I just inadvenrtantly stumbled upon the new angle to promote safe sex...
More on topic, I tend to have to agree with the OP. Sexual frustration is something of a taboo topic, but I can almost garentee it's where most stress stems from. Everyone wants ot be satisfied sexually, and those that claim they don't either have some sort of issue/illness (not saying you're the spawn of satan because of it, just that it's not normal) or they're lying to try and take away from that urge for whatever reason. If people were a little more free spirited about just getting down and dirty once in awhile, things would probably fall inro place a little more readily as our more basic needs are being met. It probably also wouldn't hurt if people just accepted that relationships are all about frequency and not scrutiny. Yes, everyone wants Mr./Miss. Right, but you'll never find him/her if you don't date, and usually sleep, around. It's not a bad thing.
I'm asking the escapist to think up some ways a person could go about introducing this idea into the rest of humanity.
