Why is The Witcher allowed to portray heterosexual male sexuality while Kojima gets grilled over it?

Recommended Videos

BarryMcCociner

New member
Feb 23, 2015
340
0
0
I thought it was important to put heterosexual male sexuality in the title as I cannot recall any instance of Geralt displaying interest in the same sex.

This kinda grinds my gears. I'm not exactly a Kojima Kultist but I respect the man, after all he DID make a great first step in popularizing the modern notion of postmodernism in games through MGS2 and I have spent many countless nights replaying his Metal Gear series, reading and watching interviews with the man himself and pondering the overlying themes of GENE, MEME, SCENE and SENSE.

I think it's safe to say that if you're going to create a list of Game Devs who have artistic merit, Kojima derves a slot in at least the top 10. The man can construct a meaningful and provoking narrative.

I know some people will want to say "But this is the series where you hide in a cardboard box and there's a man who poops himself, there isn't any meaningful subtext here. It can't tackle real issues." To which I can only say that these people are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. There's a reason most well-paced horror films has comedic relief "breather" moments in between the ever growing sense of dread. If you can't handle camp here and there, then I'm sorry but you really shouldn't be getting involved with media from Japan. [insert witticism about drills piercing heavens, batting a meteor out of the sky with a bass guitar, galaxy sized bullets and trains being suplexed here]

Might I add, that the anime with meteors being batted out of the sky with a guitar (FLCL, if you were wondering) has made grown-ass men cry. Big, hairy men with beards and tattoos and muscles. Camp =/= inability to be emotive and meaningful.

Now, enter The Witcher. Again, CDPR are developers I respect, developers I might even have to admit I have a great deal of bias toward. I love their policies on DLC, on DRM, on pricing, on piracy, everything. I think they're a dev team that at the end of the day, respects you not only as a consumer but also as a fan.

And sure, CDPR catch flak here and there for their portrayal of sexual relationships, I believe people bring up some points about a woman being almost raped then immediately jumping into bed with Geralt, but there's also people bringing up issues of Geralt's infidelity to Triss being neglected if the player so chooses to be unfaithful, a possible lack of maturity on part of CDPR, there's also two occasion in TW2 where sex is explicitly used as a quest reward, which may or may not have lead to some "b& in australia" censorship. Apparently it depends on where us Aussies get our copies. These scenes still work for me and my copy's retail.

But the thing is, the criticism CDPR catches for this is practically negligible and it's few and far between. Yet every time something happens surrounding The Phantom Pain and it's character: Quiet, Kojima is seemingly roasted on all fronts.

Yet I notice, that while the criticism of The Witcher's sexual explorations sound solid and reasonable, the criticism of Kojima seems to be going the complete other direction.

Here's an imgur a friend sent me from a Neogaf thread. Ignore the title.

http://imgur.com/k7CP1Cz

[Context: These people are all talking about Quiet's action figure having soft breasts.]

"... they used her [Quiet, a character that is in the game] as a marketing tool [for the game that she is a character in] which is unacceptable."

"Why does Japan get a pass for everything? They're like a cuter Saudi Arabia." [I won't even touch the racial undertones of that statement, but they're there.]

"I wonder how Joosten [who made the conscious decision to sell her likeness to Konami to create this game] feels after seeing her (kinda boss) upload a picture of [someone] squishing the breasts on a figure modeled after her."

I can't be the only one who finds this incredibly ridiculous, can I? I mean, this is unarguably less of an issue than The Witcher's portrayal of rape, yet I never saw people being this up-in-arms about that.

With the brouhaha that's happening in gaming right now, I'd very much appreciate a little consistency coming from the masses.
 

Bad Jim

New member
Nov 1, 2010
1,763
0
0
Because The Witcher came out years ago? The Islamic State isn't as bad as Genghis Kahns' Golden Horde but that doesn't mean any discussion should be halted until they entirely control Asia does it?
 

Zhukov

The Laughing Arsehole
Dec 29, 2009
13,769
5
43
I wasn't aware that "heterosexual male sexuality" consisted of groping action figures with specially made squishy boobs.

Clearly I have been doing it wrong all these years.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
It's probably because Kojima has been in the business longer and so we as an audience have been exposed to his shenanigans for longer. CDProject is still relatively new and thus has a few more strikes before we really start to call them out, though I feel that is already beginning. Also, I think CDPR currently has the more fanatical fanbase out of the two, who are more inclined to wave away criticism.

I guess CDPR has a bit more clout right now, particularly in the world of RPGs.
 

The Madman

New member
Dec 7, 2007
4,404
0
0
Without knowing next to anything about MGS or this supposed controversy, maybe it's because at least the female leads in the Witcher series tend to be wearing a shirt the majority of the time?

I mean bikini are great and all, but there's a time and place for that stuff and the battlefield isn't one of them, especially not when trying to be taken seriously.
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
Zhukov said:
I wasn't aware that "heterosexual male sexuality" consisted of groping action figures with specially made squishy boobs.

Clearly I have been doing it wrong all these years.
That action figure serious creeps me the fuck out. It's on the same level as those anime girl boob-mouse pads. Like, what the fuck? Seriously? Who the fuck buys these?

Get laid, please God!
 

VanQ

Casual Plebeian
Oct 23, 2009
2,729
0
0
Fappy said:
Zhukov said:
I wasn't aware that "heterosexual male sexuality" consisted of groping action figures with specially made squishy boobs.

Clearly I have been doing it wrong all these years.
That action figure serious creeps me the fuck out. It's on the same level as those anime girl boob-mouse pads. Like, what the fuck? Seriously? Who the fuck buys these?

Get laid, please God!
Getting off topic but while I've never bought a boob mouse pad, I have used ine and they're seriously comfy. Of course there are non boob alternatives (like butts, pecs and biceps) and options not modelled after body parts but who really cares if someone buys boob mouse pads.

Hell, the guy I know that has a bunch of boob mouse pads gets laid far more often than the average guy. Who are we go judge a person based on their choice of mouse pads or action figures for that matter.

This also brings up the topic of how common it is to shame men for expressing their sexuality these days. Guys buys a sex toy/body pillow/boob mousepad or fleshlight and he's treated like a shameful virgin that never gets laid. Meanwhile a woman owning any of said products would be considered normal.

I don't even own any of the products mentioned because I'm too afraid of ever being caught with them but I'll be damned if I'm going to shame some guy for such a stupid, trivial thing.

In conclusion: this is just a repeat of the Dead Island Bikini Bust from 4 years ago. It's the same oversensitive and judgemental narcissists getting s high from shaming people they disagree with. Either ignore them because they feed on your clicks and attention or call them out on their hypocrisy.

TITS ARE LIFE. ASS IS HOMETOWN.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
I heartily second this sentiment:
Zhukov said:
I wasn't aware that "heterosexual male sexuality" consisted of groping action figures with specially made squishy boobs.

Clearly I have been doing it wrong all these years.
I don't quite see the parallel (OP), so I don't see why you're comparing the stick each game/creator gets.

I personally don't see Kojima getting more criticism, so you seem to be overreacting, as well. All I see is a much bigger console IP with one of the most prominent auteurs in the medium getting more attention than a core European RPG dev - ergo it is proportional. I also think both parties deserve some of the criticism they get.

So, yeah. Non-issue is a non-issue? Quoting some random people banging on about Quiet's design is a bit pointless, too, given we really need to see Quiet's story play out to assess whether Kojima's talking a lot of old BS about her arc (I suspect his BS will just be BS, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt for now).

As for the 'action' figure of the character? It is fucking ridiculous, and it deserves mockery, but to me that's just Japan being Japanese. CDPR haven't, as far as I know, greenlight an oddly fetishistic figurine of Triss. So, again, the comparison doesn't really work. Critics are criticising different things.

LeathermanKick25 said:
Not to mention the whole "MGS is so silly it can't be taken seriously" despite exploring some truly dark themes in the past anyway.
Not to derail the thread, but; it may blow your mind to discover something can be "silly" whilst exploring "dark themes" (whatever they are... ). I'm not a fan of Kojima or MGS in general, but I played MGS and MGS2 multiple times back in the day, and they were certainly both utterly stupidly ridiculously absurd as well as being rather intelligent (neither had "dark themes", though, as far as I could tell).
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
VanQ said:
This also brings up the topic of how common it is to shame men for expressing their sexuality these days. Guys buys a sex toy/body pillow/boob mousepad or fleshlight and he's treated like a shameful virgin that never gets laid. Meanwhile a woman owning any of said products would be considered normal.
I don't know, I guess there's just an arbitrary switch in my mind that differentiates "sexual" and "pervy". Certain things fall into one category or the other. I mean, I'd think a woman owning a butt mousepad with a character from Free would be weird as fuck too, so at least from my perspective I don't really distinguish between genders.

For me, I get easily annoyed when characters are degraded outside of the context of their fictional universe. It's fine for a sexy character to strike a silly pose on some promotional thing or whatever, but I draw the line on things like body pillows and boob mousepads. I'd feel like I was disrespecting the character, I guess.

Just the way I personally feel about it. If I found out a close friend had a bunch of boob mousepads I'd probably joke about it, but it wouldn't change my opinion of them or our relationship. We're all allowed some measure of quirkiness.
 

Doom972

New member
Dec 25, 2008
2,312
0
0
CDPR are independent and make the games they want to make. People can criticize the sexual themes all they want (and they do), but it won't make CDPR change in any way. I can't say the same about Konami.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
LeathermanKick25 said:
(You do realise you just agreed with me right?
(you can edit out parts of quotes, y'know) Heh, fair point - reading my response back, I'll concede my wording was actually terrible. Chalk that up to my brain not quite kicking into gear this morning.

The point I fumbled was more; surely 'it's silly' is a legitimate reason to not play the series (which you seemed to refute). MGS and 2 did have some great ideas in and dealt with what could be described as 'mature' themes, but ultimately it's a conspiracy laden soap-opera. I can understand those who perceive great depth. And I can also understand people dismissing the series because of how goofy and convoluted it is.
 

VanQ

Casual Plebeian
Oct 23, 2009
2,729
0
0
Fappy said:
I don't know, I guess there's just an arbitrary switch in my mind that differentiates "sexual" and "pervy". Certain things fall into one category or the other. I mean, I'd think a woman owning a butt mousepad with a character from Free would be weird as fuck too, so at least from my perspective I don't really distinguish between genders.

For me, I get easily annoyed when characters are degraded outside of the context of their fictional universe. It's fine for a sexy character to strike a silly pose on some promotional thing or whatever, but I draw the line on things like body pillows and boob mousepads. I'd feel like I was disrespecting the character, I guess.

Just the way I personally feel about it. If I found out a close friend had a bunch of boob mousepads I'd probably joke about it, but it wouldn't change my opinion of them or our relationship. We're all allowed some measure of quirkiness.
And that's actually totally fine. We all have a metaphorical "line" that's different from others. I think my line is probably not too different from yours, I have no desire to own a body pillow or boob mouse pad either. Where one crosses the line is when you say something like "get laid" like you did. Because that's when you impose your standards onto another in a way that shames them.

I get that you didn't actually mean that and I doubt you'd ever do that to someone face to face because I know you're a reasonable guy. Still, seeing that line was actually what brought on my earlier rant.

Everyone has different needs and wants and expresses themselves differently. Forcing yours on others is when there's a problem. This doll is hurting nobody and the few people that do buy it will probably admire it in private and you'll never actually know or care.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
Fappy said:
Get laid, please God!
God doesn't need you to tell Him when to get laid, sir!
Doom972 said:
CDPR are independent and make the games they want to make. People can criticize the sexual themes all they want (and they do), but it won't make CDPR change in any way. I can't say the same about Konami.
Konami isn't Kojima though, certainly not anymore. Kojima tends to make whatever he wants, too. Which is why a lot of people say he needs an editor to reign him in.
 

DementedSheep

New member
Jan 8, 2010
2,654
0
0
At least in the Witcher they tend to be relatively clothed when not fucking Geralt. Quiet looks like a trashy whore all the time and the Witcher has gotten shit.
 

wizzy555

New member
Oct 14, 2010
637
0
0
Kojima is a person and symbol, he is a straight white white white Japanese cis male. He is rich and famous and actively mocks SJWs, he is well known, rich, white and successful.

The Witcher is made by poor faceless Polish developers who aren't well known.
 

Darth Rosenberg

New member
Oct 25, 2011
1,288
0
0
LeathermanKick25 said:
The problem I had was everyone saying MGS was too silly of a series to show rape and other stuff in Ground Zeroes, when the series has had stuff as bad, if not worse since the first one anyway.
I can only speak of MGS 1 and 2, and in those games, no, neither had anything as sensitive as rape. There's also a time and place for such subject matter, and I don't think a goofball conspiracy soap-opera is it. MGS1's [variously hamfisted] existentialism worked fine (apropos 'mature' themes), but sexual assault's a jarring tonal change. I've heard the Ground Zeroes content, and to me it's horribly misjudged verging on exploitative.

In relation to the thread; I have issues with both companies, but I don't think anything CDPR have done is as crass as hearing rape audio in a poorly written [and acted] interrogation scene. If that's there to somehow underline what a badguy The Badguy is? Then, well, Kojima is now nothing but a hack.