Oh dear. This turned ugly. Time to post, and to get you to all look upon the kitty cat:
Gundam GP01 said:
THIS MAN IS AN IDIOT HACK. STOP LINKING HIS REVIEWS. HIS OPINIONS ARE WORTHLESS.
As much as I dislike his style of reviews, I wouldn't go so far as to call the opinions worthless, or to call him an idiot. I feel that his style of reviewing is trying too hard to be "edgy," and that's what's more annoying than anything else to me.
B-Cell said:
[He is only guy who have guts to speak against xray vision and see through walls.
Wait, what? What the heck is wrong with those abilities?
B-Cell said:
what about Doom? its one of the best SP of FPS in decade.
I'll agree to disagree there. While I've had some fun with it, so far, Doom 2016 has been mostly "meh" for me. It's certainly a break from recent singleplayer design, but it's repetitive, the story is bleh, and if anything, I find myself missing Doom 3.
erttheking said:
How many people are still playing Doom's shit multiplayer game? And even then, while I liked Doom, it wasn't flawless. The combat was a lot of fun, but it seriously needed to stop and take a breath.
Raises hand gingerly...
In fairness though, the multiplayer isn't that spectacular either. It's fine, it can be enjoyable, it's given me a love-hate relationship with its loadout system, it feels like an inferior version of Halo 5's multiplayer, but with some nice Doom touches (e.g. demons).
Gundam GP01 said:
First off, I am not your fucking friend. I actually kind of hate you.
The kitty cat, Gundam! Look at the kitty cat!
Ezekiel said:
Half-Life 2 is a 4/5 game, easily. Much more stimulating than modern FPS campaigns.
I'd give it more a 3/5 really, same as Doom 2016 right now. In hindsight, I can appreciate what Half-Life 2 pioneered, but I find a lot of it hit and miss, ranging from its gameplay (urban combat on one hand, tedious platforming on the other) to its characters (some I loved, some I wanted to just shut up), to its story (more interesting for its delivery than its content).