Would you watch this on t.v?

Recommended Videos

Mcupobob

New member
Jun 29, 2009
3,449
0
0
Alright escapist heres my idea and really its justs something silly I thought up so don't take this as a serious topic.

I was reading up on Andrew Jackson and heard the man was and I quote "a dueling ************". I was thinking to myself "how many duels has Obama won? Zero!" then I realized I would be to much a pansy myself to accept a duel. However I would love to watch dueling on T.V! Pistols at dawn, swords or what have you to the death duels is something as a society I feel we really dropped the ball on.

So I want to ask you dear escapist, would you watch dueling on t.v? And I mean to the death dueling, obviously its going to be pay-preview. A spectator sport, with a arena. You can choose to settle your differences to a duel to the death of your choice.

For those interested in the rules heres who it would go down.
1. You challenge your opponent(or rival) to a duel, if they decline thats the end of it.

2. If they accept the challenge you both must register, sign a wavier and await your spot on dueling day, you can back out if you both agree, before the day of the duel.

3. The day has come and you both enter the stadium, the announcer tells the crowd of specters the grievance and cause of the duel. You're both issued a .45 caliber pistol loaded and checked by the ref with one bullet. the weapons are well maintained to insure maximum quality.

4. Stand back to back and walk ten paces and shoot.

5. If you cheat the ref shoots you dead, I.E turn around before ten paces. In the unlikely event that your weapon malfunctions, said party is given a settlement, however a lawsuit will not be pursed due to the waiver. If you miss/injure each other instead of kill then if both parties agree you can sign up again to duel.

You may not badger a person into a duel, and or lampoon them if they decline. If they decline that is the end of it. If both parties accept they must also both agree to the type of duel they wish to participate in.
 

Katie Dahl

New member
May 15, 2011
1
0
0
In a perfect world this would work but in this one it would just result in a lot of dead people who agreed during a period of emotional distress That's not good because people prone to emotional destress are the intellegent ones that make our society go round. Historicly blood sport has decreased the intelegence of the population as a whole.

(No I will not cite. I'm just trying to get that stupid panda crying message off my view.)
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
That somehow reminds me of this movie:

It's not about dueling, but amounts to pretty much the same thing.
 

StBishop

New member
Sep 22, 2009
3,251
0
0
Mcupobob said:
2. If they accept the challenge you both must register, sign a wavier and await your spot on dueling day, you can back out if you both agree, before the day of the duel.
Beyond finding the whole premise disgusting, I take issue with the bolded part.

That would never fly. You'd need to be able to pull out at any point up until the moment the referee calls that you turn.
 

DEAD34345

New member
Aug 18, 2010
1,929
0
0
No...

Although duels do have a certain aspect to them that makes them seem cool or interesting in fiction, in real life it would just be a brutal and unnecessary end to someone's life. Allowing this sort of thing, never mind actually paying to watch it, would be completely disgusting.

Not to mention it would be rather boring. Turning around and firing a single bullet at one another would be about luck more than anything else, and after one second of action it would just be two people on the floor bleeding and moaning.
 

gigastar

Insert one-liner here.
Sep 13, 2010
4,419
0
0
It could work, but televising death is not going to sit well with far more people than those who would be ok with/dont care about it.
 

redisforever

New member
Oct 5, 2009
2,158
0
0
Do this, but with paintball, or something. That way, nobody dies. Airsoft, actually. I like the idea though.
 

Monsterfurby

New member
Mar 7, 2008
871
0
0
redisforever said:
Do this, but with paintball, or something. That way, nobody dies. Airsoft, actually. I like the idea though.
Paintball and Airsoft in general should get more mainstream media coverage. Since e-sports is moving up in general popularity, I don't see why this should not.
 

Xeldrak

New member
Feb 8, 2011
37
0
0
Actually? I think this would be simply disgusting....

Why don't we start building new collosseums while we are at it. Where gladiators can fight to the death with one another? We could feed poor people to wild animals...for a compensation of course...
 

redisforever

New member
Oct 5, 2009
2,158
0
0
Monsterfurby said:
redisforever said:
Do this, but with paintball, or something. That way, nobody dies. Airsoft, actually. I like the idea though.
Paintball and Airsoft in general should get more mainstream media coverage. Since e-sports is moving up in general popularity, I don't see why this should not.
I totally agree. The problem with them is when most people see them, they think "GUNS!" and decide it's bad for children or something, and it must be banned.
 

Scarim Coral

Jumped the ship
Legacy
Oct 29, 2010
18,157
2
3
Country
UK
No. Not all of us take pleasure/ are entertained in seeing pointless death (or death in the name of entertainment).
 

ShindoL Shill

Truely we are the Our Avatars XI
Jul 11, 2011
21,802
0
0
How about this (just an adjustment so we don't have the whole 'death' thing):
Don't use bullets, use paintball guns. Also, it's a full-scale battle (cameras on trees, cameras in helmets etc). If it's a draw (ie no 'survivors'), it goes to a captain v captain duel.
 

J Tyran

New member
Dec 15, 2011
2,407
0
0
If two people mutually agree to a brutal fight, possibly to do the death they should have the right to do it. Televising it for entertainment sounds dreadful though, my mind boggles at thought that there might people be people around that would find it entertaining.
 

krazykidd

New member
Mar 22, 2008
6,099
0
0
Lunncal said:
No...

Although duels do have a certain aspect to them that makes them seem cool or interesting in fiction, in real life it would just be a brutal and unnecessary end to someone's life. Allowing this sort of thing, never mind actually paying to watch it, would be completely disgusting.

Not to mention it would be rather boring. Turning around and firing a single bullet at one another would be about luck more than anything else, and after one second of action it would just be two people on the floor bleeding and moaning.
But if they both agree , why not? Plus if it's pay-per-view , YOU don't have to watch it , just people that want to ( and you and i both know people are going to want to watch it). But i do agree it would be boring with guns , maybe swords would be more entertaining . Not many people know how to weild a sword properly , i would be funny. imagine two rednecks with a sword i'd pay to watch that . Hell i'd even place bets on who is more likely to accidentally stab himself.