X-Men Origins:Wolverine:Uncaged Edition review by:Elvisteen

Recommended Videos

Syphonz

New member
Aug 22, 2008
1,255
0
0
1.) Write the review, don't just link it to a video video review you have done.

2.) Pacing. For a little bit the MovieBob style of random pictures for either comic effect lagged way back to what topic you were really on.

3.) you said Gameplay was decent and then said the Combat was terrible. But if I'm not mistaken, combat is the main selling point to this game. Don't confuse the two.

4.) It died. Unfinished.
 

Drakulla

New member
May 19, 2009
332
0
0
I liked this game because of the visceral nature of the main character. It's great that Wolverine finally got the game he needs to show off his bad ass nature. Wolverine was awesome in the comics but gimped in the cartoons. The game is a little too button masher repetitive but has enough variety in the type of kills and story to keep you interested. Plus its bloody as all hell and you get to see Wolverines adamantium skeleton when he takes damage. The voice acting is good and the graphics are great considering they used the Unreal Engine. The story is its own stand alone story except for the portions of the movie thrown into the game for back story. All in all its a solid 10 hour game that's fun to play. its also got 3 Easter eggs in the, Lost, WOW and Portal.
 

mjhhiv

New member
Jun 22, 2008
758
0
0
Someone mentioned that you can't use video reviews... In this case, I agree, this post seems a bit like spamming. But when done right, I don't see how video reviews are bad. Quickening666, for example, is great with his video reviews, and it doesn't seem like spamming. Of course, I'm no authority on the matter. Maybe just a brief description of the review in the OP would help.
 

Quickening666

New member
May 7, 2008
150
0
0
mjhhiv said:
Someone mentioned that you can't use video reviews... In this case, I agree, this post seems a bit like spamming. But when done right, I don't see how video reviews are bad. Quickening666, for example, is great with his video reviews, and it doesn't seem like spamming. Of course, I'm no authority on the matter. Maybe just a brief description of the review in the OP would help.
I read the FAQ before posting my first video review here. It states that "a review is a review" in reference to movie reviews and since it doesn't mention types of review I just took that sentiment and assumed videos reviews would also be acceptable. They're still "user reviews" and relevant to the forum. I don't write reviews, I make videos so if I want to share my reviews here then it has to be in video form.

EDIT: Besides that I don't just pop in to pimp my newest video, I participate in the forum.
 

mjhhiv

New member
Jun 22, 2008
758
0
0
Quickening666 said:
mjhhiv said:
Someone mentioned that you can't use video reviews... In this case, I agree, this post seems a bit like spamming. But when done right, I don't see how video reviews are bad. Quickening666, for example, is great with his video reviews, and it doesn't seem like spamming. Of course, I'm no authority on the matter. Maybe just a brief description of the review in the OP would help.
I read the FAQ before posting my first video review here. It states that "a review is a review" in reference to movie reviews and since it doesn't mention types of review I just took that sentiment and assumed videos reviews would also be acceptable. They're still "user reviews" and relevant to the forum. I don't write reviews, I make videos so if I want to share my reviews here then it has to be in video form.
Like I said, your reviews are great. I do think that the forum rules were talking about movie reviews as in reviews of movies, not video reviews, but I could be wrong. Either way, I'm not aware of anyone whose gotten banned for doing video reviews. It'd just be nice if this one wasn't spam.