What difference? What I'm watching here is apologia for ethnic cleansing. Downplaying an attempt to forcibly evict people from their land to take it. I'm watching someone try to steer a conversation away from talking about ethnic cleansing.
This is an outright, tiresome little lie. Absolutely nothing I've written here is downplaying what happened or offering apologia for it. Nothing. You're just flinging that accusation to try to end any discussion about escalation.
Because it wasn't 160k people threatened, it was the whole of the Gaza strip. The Israeli media and leadership spent the last 15 months telling anyone who'd listen that they're going to steal all the land. They've already been selling parcels of land in the strip. And here you are, running interference.
90+% of the Gaza strip was subjected to bombing, and 1.9m people were displaced. But I didn't say just 160k people were
threatened or affected in some way. Stop rewriting what I'm saying to make it more convenient to respond to.
160k was the approximate drop in population of the strip over the course of the year. Some 60k died, and the majority of the rest were likely internationally displaced. That's the 160k.
There is something of a difference between 160k population drop and 2.2m population removed. I fear the removal of the remaining 2.05million from Gaza. And you're going to sit there and tell me that's not a difference at all, and that fearing the removal of 2m more people is somehow "apologia" for the earlier removal of 160k? Get the fuck off it.