You don't directly answer my questions.
I don't answer
irrelevant questions. Often, if we're discussing X, you'll just entirely shift onto asking, "well what about Y", "why are you defending Z", or whatever else. It's your primary approach: shift topic whenever things get awkward.
I dont answer those questions, because i hope it forces you to stay on topic, or at least stops you forgetting what we're discussing.
Concerning myocarditis:
"We have not seen a signal and we've actually looked intentionally for the signal in the over 200 million doses we've given," Walensky said in a press briefing.
This statement, from April 2021, was true. At the time, the claim of increased risk was based on about 14 cases in tens of millions of recipients, and the immediate chemical studies did not establish a causal connection.
A 1-in-10,000 link was identified a year
after this statement was made-- scarcely identifiable as a discrepancy from the rate in the general population, and still significantly lower than the risk of myocarditis from covid itself.
This is a pathetic deflection to distract from RFK publishing AI slop.
The covid stuff actually effected people, this report that you're b!tching about is not going to end up effecting anyone. You have double standards for your team and hand out passes all the time.
If an anti-vaxxer conspiracy theorist luddite leads the department of health, it will affect things. He can put a stop to vital research, defund projects, terminate staff. And now we know he'll do it on the basis of wholly hallucinatory AI jargon.
Why was stuff that literally made no sense whatsoever done? This was in the name of science, don't you remember?
That Canadian band did what it did "in the name of science" rather than just as a misguided early effort when the virus was poorly understood, did it? The scientific community endorsed it? The gov endorsed it? Horseshit. You're moaning about nothing.