In spite of everything, Biden reaffirms dislike of M4A

Recommended Videos
Status
Not open for further replies.

SupahEwok

Malapropic Homophone
Legacy
Jun 24, 2010
4,028
1,401
118
Country
Texas
Well, lets look at this logically. We have a 2 party system, the incumbent has the advantage, not voting means you don't matter, voting for a third party is a waste of your vote since they have no chance, therefore by not voting for the candidate that has a chance to beat the incumbent you are essentially giving approval to the incumbent.
Let's look at this logically. Voting against your interests is the death of a democracy. What did the founders of America say when they believed that they no longer had a say in how they'd be governed?

In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

...

"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
I can explain their reasoning in simpler words if you would find that helpful.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
What did the founders of America say when they believed that they no longer had a say in how they'd be governed?
Probably something about how it was ok to own slaves and not give women the vote. One should be just a teensy bit critical of what they were saying.

EDIT: In any case, short of a revolution, you've got all of two potential options and that's it. I don't see anybody in the thread saying that's a good situation to be in, just that it's the situation the US is in and this is not going to change.
 

SupahEwok

Malapropic Homophone
Legacy
Jun 24, 2010
4,028
1,401
118
Country
Texas
Please do not insult other users.
Probably something about how it was ok to own slaves and not give women the vote. One should be just a teensy bit critical of what they were saying.
Oh good sir, I am slain by thy wit. Verily, who could have foreseen that thou would point out in this discourse that certain personages of yesteryear, being among the most educated and enlightened of their day, could nevertheless have moral smidgens that entirely eradicate any claim to progress or moral centaintude, yea, even unto the 7th generation of the 7th generation. For lo, our entire conception of progress, rights of the individual and the collective, laws and orders, all founded upon imperfections of latter days! Forsooth, thou hast cast me in a most terrible conundrum! My very life, perpetuated by medicines contributed to by blackguards and charlatans! This communications device, devised by those with nothing more than base gold on the mind! Oh calamity! How can I ever move on! My entire modern life, a charade, a lie, a monstrosity, built on the backs of the undesirables, the evil, the morally compromised!

There is but one solution! Join me brothers! Cast aside your profane luxuries, your conceptions of right and wrong! The only right is that all of humanity, for we have all benefited from evil, must cast aside all that we owe to evil, which is everything. And yea, we must go to the wilderness, and proffer our walking carcasses to nature, for such is our undying shame that only through death and re-nourishment of the soil may our sorry race's history be forgotten, and a more virtuous species be given the room to arise!

Or maybe we can quit engaging in shitty, trendy "poisoning the well" fallacies, and discuss matters like we're adults with enough brain cells that generate enough electrical activity to at least be the equal of a potato computer, rather than vacuous argue-bots based on machine learning training sets drawn from Twitter.
 
Last edited:

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
Oh good sir, I am slain by thy wit. Verily, who could have foreseen that thou would point out in this discourse that certain personages of yesteryear, being among the most educated and enlightened of their day, could nevertheless have moral smidgens that entirely eradicate any claim to progress or moral centaintude, yea, even unto the 7th generation of the 7th generation. For lo, our entire conception of progress, rights of the individual and the collective, laws and orders, all founded upon imperfections of latter days! Forsooth, thou hast cast me in a most terrible conundrum! My very life, perpetuated by medicines contributed to by blackguards and charlatans! This communications device, devised by those with nothing more than base gold on the mind! Oh calamity! How can I ever move on! My entire modern life, a charade, a lie, a monstrosity, built on the backs of the undesirables, the evil, the morally compromised!

There is but one solution! Join me brothers! Cast aside your profane luxuries, your conceptions of right and wrong! The only right is that all of humanity, for we have all benefited from evil, must cast aside all that we owe to evil, which is everything. And yea, we must go to the wilderness, and proffer our walking carcasses to nature, for such is our undying shame that only through death and re-nourishment of the soil may our sorry race's history be forgotten, and a more virtuous species be given the room to arise!

Or maybe we can quit engaging in shitty, trendy "poisoning the well" fallacies, and discuss matters like we're adults with enough brain cells that generate enough electrical activity to at least be the equal of a potato computer, rather than vacuous argue-bots based on machine learning training sets drawn from Twitter.
Yeah but fuck the founders, Jefferson was a loser and I spit on his grave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sneed's SeednFeed

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
13,054
6,748
118
Country
United Kingdom
It largely becomes academic whether it's intentional or just a result of a massive gulf between what people vote for and what they get. Whatever the reason behind it, it's the end result of the vote blue no matter who mentality. You don't get blue votes. It happens too much and too often to be coincidence in my mind, but it doesn't have to be intentional to get the same result and demonstrate the need to vote on policy, not team color.
But the majority of Democratic Senators told the whip they would vote for it even after Reconciliation. Their voters did get blue votes.

The end result is that I don't trust Biden. I have no reason to trust Biden. He's still against M4A and any statement of support of a public option is countered by him helping shoot it down before.
That's fair enough. Though there's plenty in his record that is broadly in line with the measures to expand coverage to those eligible for Medicaid, and to cap premiums-- these both build logically on ACA provisions that were restricted by outside forces such as the Supreme Court.

It seems to me that you're discounting any improvement to the current system if it isn't complete replacement with M4A. And that will merely result in a severely degrading system, and still no replacement.

There are however decades of cuts, counting up to a total that I don't even want to think about. And since I don't want cuts period, I don't like Joe Biden on this front. Really I just don't like him on any front because he's a Republican at heart. I don't care for the lesser of two evils argument because that sets the new normal. It has done so for decades and the Democrats can't keep getting away with it.
I went over, in detail, every healthcare cut or freeze that Joe Biden has been involved with in another thread. The worst was support for a year-long freeze, which is shitty indeed, but absolutely nothing came anywhere remotely close to a decade of cuts coming to 800 billion.

This equivalence is not based on record or substance. It's not true scepticism: that would necessitate you consider figures, consider scale.

I don't think I said Biden and Trump's plans were equivalent. Biden is the better option. It's just not a good one
You said Biden "wasn't much better".

You're right, it's not a good option. The American healthcare system is grotesque.

But it's not just better. Not having an 800 billion cut is enormously, incomparably better than having one. Lowering the cap on premiums is enormously better than removing the cap altogether. It's not even the same goddamn ballpark, and these differences mean hundreds of thousands of lives.

Or maybe we can quit engaging in shitty, trendy "poisoning the well" fallacies, and discuss matters like we're adults with enough brain cells that generate enough electrical activity to at least be the equal of a potato computer, rather than vacuous argue-bots based on machine learning training sets drawn from Twitter.
It's a perfectly valid point to make that evoking the opinions of the Founding Fathers in a discussion on modern politics is a shortcut to nowhere.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,870
2,349
118
Well, lets look at this logically. We have a 2 party system, the incumbent has the advantage, not voting means you don't matter, voting for a third party is a waste of your vote since they have no chance, therefore by not voting for the candidate that has a chance to beat the incumbent you are essentially giving approval to the incumbent.
Again, I'm not playing The DNCs rigged game that just holds me hostage rather than gives me my best interests. The DNC has used vinegar my entire voting life and I'm done with tolerating their vinegar and will from now on demand honey.

So here's the cold hard logic for The DNC

Support M4A = My Vote
Don't Support M4A = No Vote

Speaking of logic...
Vote for Biden = a vote for Biden
Vote for Trump = a vote for Trump
Vote for Third Party = a vote for Third Party
Not Voting = No Vote

The DNC has my demand. It is now on them to decide what to do with said demand.
 

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,660
978
118
Country
USA
Honestly, if Biden came out tomorrow and said "You know what, I changed my mind, M4A is my #1 goal! And not that bullshit Obama-Care M4A but the real one that every other country has figured out how to make work!!!!"
No country has Medicare for All.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,526
4,295
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
Let's look at this logically. Voting against your interests is the death of a democracy. What did the founders of America say when they believed that they no longer had a say in how they'd be governed?
Oh wow you have me so convinced, except you fucken don't because if the founders didn't give us the kind of voting system that would prevent a 2 party system from taking form. If they had then your point might have made sense, but they didn't and here we are. So you have to suck up the fact that there is only one option to get rid of trump, otherwise you are giving him your support, unless you feel like going 2nd amendment on this.

Support M4A = My Vote
Don't Support M4A = No Vote
Well the DNC already pretty much supports M4A so vote Biden.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,870
2,349
118
Oh wow you have me so convinced, except you fucken don't because if the founders didn't give us the kind of voting system that would prevent a 2 party system from taking form. If they had then your point might have made sense, but they didn't and here we are. So you have to suck up the fact that there is only one option to get rid of trump, otherwise you are giving him your support, unless you feel like going 2nd amendment on this.


Well the DNC already pretty much supports M4A so vote Biden.
I will vote for DNC members who support M4A

Biden is not one of them. Therefore I will not vote Biden
 
  • Like
Reactions: crimson5pheonix

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,870
2,349
118
I mean, that's for you to decide. We have different goals. Mine is as cut and dry as removing someone that I've seen has caused nothing but division and strife for this country.

I don't know what kind of President Biden would be. I assume not one of note. And after four years of this BS, that's perfectly fine with me. So Biden isn't going to be the Democratic Messiah. As much as I like Bernie, neither would he have been. It takes a lot more than just getting a President in to enact real change. We need a favorable Supreme Court. We need a Progressive or Progressive Sympathetic Senate and House. We need Judges.

As Known As things we're not going to get for years. Years.

So at this time, yeah, Trump's removal is at the highest priority for me. Then trying to get at least some more judges. Vote in more Progressives and/or Non-Corporate Democrats or Independents. Clean the mess up before anything else.
Then we have two different goals. I'm done with The Status Quo and especially after Corona just demonstrated why it's an AWFUL idea to have your insurance tied to your employer, a lot more people agree with me than they do with The Status Quo

I will vote accordingly. If Biden wants to gamble that there are more people who want The Status Quo back over actual improvements, that's on him.
 

Specter Von Baren

Annoying Green Gadfly
Legacy
Aug 25, 2013
5,637
2,859
118
I don't know, send help!
Country
USA
Gender
Cuttlefish
Oh good sir, I am slain by thy wit. Verily, who could have foreseen that thou would point out in this discourse that certain personages of yesteryear, being among the most educated and enlightened of their day, could nevertheless have moral smidgens that entirely eradicate any claim to progress or moral centaintude, yea, even unto the 7th generation of the 7th generation. For lo, our entire conception of progress, rights of the individual and the collective, laws and orders, all founded upon imperfections of latter days! Forsooth, thou hast cast me in a most terrible conundrum! My very life, perpetuated by medicines contributed to by blackguards and charlatans! This communications device, devised by those with nothing more than base gold on the mind! Oh calamity! How can I ever move on! My entire modern life, a charade, a lie, a monstrosity, built on the backs of the undesirables, the evil, the morally compromised!

There is but one solution! Join me brothers! Cast aside your profane luxuries, your conceptions of right and wrong! The only right is that all of humanity, for we have all benefited from evil, must cast aside all that we owe to evil, which is everything. And yea, we must go to the wilderness, and proffer our walking carcasses to nature, for such is our undying shame that only through death and re-nourishment of the soil may our sorry race's history be forgotten, and a more virtuous species be given the room to arise!

Or maybe we can quit engaging in shitty, trendy "poisoning the well" fallacies, and discuss matters like we're adults with enough brain cells that generate enough electrical activity to at least be the equal of a potato computer, rather than vacuous argue-bots based on machine learning training sets drawn from Twitter.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ravinoff and Kwak

tstorm823

Elite Member
Legacy
Aug 4, 2011
7,660
978
118
Country
USA
Call it whatever you want; I want Medical Care to be a Right, not a "Cash or Credit?" in this country. Politicians who support that, no matter what they call it, will get my vote. Politicians who do not support that do not.
I don't mean they have a different name for the concept you want. I mean nobody has that system at all.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,870
2,349
118
I don't mean they have a different name for the concept you want. I mean nobody has that system at all.
I mean, yeah, if you want to get cute with the EXACT DEFINITION of every place, sure, that could be the case.

Basically what I want would be the ability to not have to worry about if my doctor appointment is going to be covered. I want to be able to go to a doctor and not have to worry about if this will end up Bankrupting me. I want to be able to do the recommended treatment given to me by my doctor that I can't right now because my fucking health insurance deemed it "unnecessary".

Call it Medicare For All. Call it Single Payer. Call it Trump Care for all it matters to me. I want this country to treat Health Care like the Right it should be, not the For Profit dumpster fire we currently have. How anyone could look at the millions of jobs (and therefore insurance coverage) lost in the middle of a global pandemic and decide "This is Fine" is baffling to me.
 

SupahEwok

Malapropic Homophone
Legacy
Jun 24, 2010
4,028
1,401
118
Country
Texas
I mean, yeah, if you want to get cute with the EXACT DEFINITION of every place, sure, that could be the case.

Basically what I want would be the ability to not have to worry about if my doctor appointment is going to be covered. I want to be able to go to a doctor and not have to worry about if this will end up Bankrupting me. I want to be able to do the recommended treatment given to me by my doctor that I can't right now because my fucking health insurance deemed it "unnecessary".

Call it Medicare For All. Call it Single Payer. Call it Trump Care for all it matters to me. I want this country to treat Health Care like the Right it should be, not the For Profit dumpster fire we currently have. How anyone could look at the millions of jobs (and therefore insurance coverage) lost in the middle of a global pandemic and decide "This is Fine" is baffling to me.
It'd also be nice if I could go to the doctor that I want, not have to do a dance of looking up who my insurance covers and figuring out which of those are decent.
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
13,054
6,748
118
Country
United Kingdom
I will vote for DNC members who support M4A

Biden is not one of them. Therefore I will not vote Biden
So you plan to vote in the House of Representatives election in November, but not the Presidential?

Those Representatives, of course, need to operate partly with the assent of the Executive, which they're much likelier to get with their own party in control. So you'd be hobbling their ability to get anything passed at the same time.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,526
4,295
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
I will vote for DNC members who support M4A

Biden is not one of them. Therefore I will not vote Biden
Yeah, see, you're ok with trump cause you obviously think hes going to get you there before Biden.
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,870
2,349
118
So you plan to vote in the House of Representatives election in November, but not the Presidential?

Those Representatives, of course, need to operate partly with the assent of the Executive, which they're much likelier to get with their own party in control. So you'd be hobbling their ability to get anything passed at the same time.
Yeah, see, you're ok with trump cause you obviously think hes going to get you there before Biden.
I'll vote in the Presidential Election too. Plenty of parties who DO support M4A (granted, I haven't really looked into much of it yet given it's still early and I was really hoping Biden would open his eyes and stop being on his knees for Insurance Companies) that I can vote for when it comes to the presidency.

I've said it multiple times now so I'm going to only say this one more time; I'm done being The DNCs hostage. My entire voting life has been "Vote for our DNC guy because if you don't, THEY might get to be put in charge!!!!". So yeah, fuck'em. If they want my vote, I have made my demands clear. I don't want Trump to win but I'm not going to let The DNC walk all over me.

As the popular meme goes (normally I don't like to do the Political memes like this because they boil down complicated issues to stupid bullet points but in this case, I'll make the exception); The DNC has entered the "And Find Out" stage of "Fuck Around and Find Out". They chose to fuck around and spit in the eyes of Progressives, now it's on them to figure it out from here.
 

Worgen

Follower of the Glorious Sun Butt.
Legacy
Apr 1, 2009
15,526
4,295
118
Gender
Whatever, just wash your hands.
I'll vote in the Presidential Election too. Plenty of parties who DO support M4A (granted, I haven't really looked into much of it yet given it's still early and I was really hoping Biden would open his eyes and stop being on his knees for Insurance Companies) that I can vote for when it comes to the presidency.

I've said it multiple times now so I'm going to only say this one more time; I'm done being The DNCs hostage. My entire voting life has been "Vote for our DNC guy because if you don't, THEY might get to be put in charge!!!!". So yeah, fuck'em. If they want my vote, I have made my demands clear. I don't want Trump to win but I'm not going to let The DNC walk all over me.

As the popular meme goes (normally I don't like to do the Political memes like this because they boil down complicated issues to stupid bullet points but in this case, I'll make the exception); The DNC has entered the "And Find Out" stage of "Fuck Around and Find Out". They chose to fuck around and spit in the eyes of Progressives, now it's on them to figure it out from here.
So you do want trump to win, got it. You don't need to be this circuitous about the whole thing. Just say "I think trump will do a better job then the only other party who could beat him." Simple as that, no need to beat around the bush.
 

Silvanus

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 15, 2013
13,054
6,748
118
Country
United Kingdom
I've said it multiple times now so I'm going to only say this one more time; I'm done being The DNCs hostage. My entire voting life has been "Vote for our DNC guy because if you don't, THEY might get to be put in charge!!!!". So yeah, fuck'em. If they want my vote, I have made my demands clear. I don't want Trump to win but I'm not going to let The DNC walk all over me.
You don't see it as worth voting for the introduction of a public option, the cap on premiums, or the premium-free coverage for those in states not covered by Medicaid? Those would be pretty drastic improvements.

It seems a lot of people aren't willing to support any improvement to the existing system, unless it's complete replacement. I daresay that approach probably contributed to the situation the American healthcare system is currently in.

So you do want trump to win, got it. You don't need to be this circuitous about the whole thing. Just say "I think trump will do a better job then the only other party who could beat him." Simple as that, no need to beat around the bush.
This isn't persuasive.

The Democrats (and left-of-centre parties around the world) cannot rely on this. You base an argument on not being the other guy, and you fail to enthuse anybody: we've seen it happen too many times.

Talk about the difference in substance. No need to mischaracterise or alienate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.