One theory I read was that this event was an extraction of an undercover agent, with the reasoning being that:Watching this video...
Eventually, someone is going to get killed over this. Anyone can buy that tactical looking gear (just pay attention to some of those "Open our state back up" Protests and I can guarantee there are a number of protesters who look EXACTLY like those two). Just grabbing citizens off the street and bringing them to a unmarked van, eventually they're going to try to grab the wrong citizen who is armed and opens fire.
If it was an extraction it was a very poorly done one. The entire world is reporting on it, and government officials are calling for answers and investigations.One theory I read was that this event was an extraction of an undercover agent, with the reasoning being that:
- the guy was very calm about the whole thing
- No words were exchanged. No yelling of "POLICE, or STOP, or HANDS BEHIND YOUR HEAD" or any of the usual things police yell when they arrest somebody
- No handcuffs or restraints were used
- No marked cars
That...I mean, that does make a lot of sense and would be a lot better than The Trump Secret Police Force coming out like this but there are reports of this exact same exchange happening a bunch overnight (no identifying yourself/no talking to the person being arrested, no badges/identifying insignia, unmarked vehicle, etc).One theory I read was that this event was an extraction of an undercover agent, with the reasoning being that:
- the guy was very calm about the whole thing
- No words were exchanged. No yelling of "POLICE, or STOP, or HANDS BEHIND YOUR HEAD" or any of the usual things police yell when they arrest somebody
- No handcuffs or restraints were used
- No marked cars
Something tells me you're not exactly volunteering to be example #1 of this tactic. Chicken-hawking doesn't suddenly become righteous just because you might have better ideals than neocons.Your stance is people shouldn't defend themselves from individuals visually indistinct from armed white supremacists, who aren't identifying themselves and have no visual signifiers as to who they are except for a generic "police" patch literally anyone could purchase and wear, disappearing people into the back of unmarked civilian vehicles?
Just as with the use of chemical weapons against protesters, were this an armed conflict between nation-states it would be a violation of international law -- a notably vile one, as this voids rules of engagement and prisoner-of-war status for captured combatants.
If there are other videos, I'm not finding them. I found a site that said there were but all I'm finding is the same one. How do we even know who these people are that are abducting people?That...I mean, that does make a lot of sense and would be a lot better than The Trump Secret Police Force coming out like this but there are reports of this exact same exchange happening a bunch overnight (no identifying yourself/no talking to the person being arrested, no badges/identifying insignia, unmarked vehicle, etc).
I'm sure there's plenty of other video out there by now (or if not, there will be as people are now going to specifically be on the lookout for this kind of thing; this was the only video that I at least found in my searching so I can't say for sure what else is out there) so we'll see for sure once more and more videos show up.
At the very least, if this was a legit arrest and not a undercover thing like you're suggesting, these guys had better start identifying themselves and whatnot or it will be only a matter of time before someone starts a fire fight thinking they're getting kidnapped instead of arrested by an official government agency.
I think his point was more that if unmarked, unidentified, silent, armed and masked men in unmarked cars are rolling up and taking people off the street, how do you tell the difference between actual government agents and actual kidnappers pretending to be? If you can buy all the paraphernalia these 'agents' are wearing online and rent a van you can basically kidnap anyone you want at any time and people will just blame the government.Something tells me you're not exactly volunteering to be example #1 of this tactic. Chicken-hawking doesn't suddenly become righteous just because you might have better ideals than neocons.
Until you're willing to actively put your life on the line, maybe don't advocate for an escalation of violence.
I wasn't trying to comment on the morality/legality/etc of self-defense. I was talking about the call for others to put themselves in harm's way while sitting comfortably at home typing away at a computer. Hell, carrying a weapon might actually be the right thing to do, but, make no mistake, these federal agents would have no qualms responding lethally as we've seen other law enforcement do time and time again.I think his point was more that if unmarked, unidentified, silent, armed and masked men in unmarked cars are rolling up and taking people off the street, how do you tell the difference between actual government agents and actual kidnappers pretending to be? If you can buy all the paraphernalia these 'agents' are wearing online and rent a van you can basically kidnap anyone you want at any time and people will just blame the government.
I can tell you if two guys just walked up to me and tried to take me in a van I would fight back. I've taught self defense - nothing good happens when people take you into a van.
Right now, all we have is people's word for it that this is happening to multiple people and multiple politicians (specifically the mayor of Portland) are talking about it. If it is indeed Fake News and it's not happening, I would think that the government agencies (specifically Homeland Security) would be tripping over themselves to deny they're doing it as the optics alone look awful.If there are other videos, I'm not finding them. I found a site that said there were but all I'm finding is the same one. How do we even know who these people are that are abducting people?
Government organizations are very slow to respond to these sorts of things. Singular politicians will make an immediate response but an organization always tries to come up with some kind of sanitized statement before saying something.Right now, all we have is people's word for it that this is happening to multiple people and multiple politicians (specifically the mayor of Portland) are talking about it. If it is indeed Fake News and it's not happening, I would think that the government agencies (specifically Homeland Security) would be tripping over themselves to deny they're doing it as the optics alone look awful.
Here, found something more concreteGovernment organizations are very slow to respond to these sorts of things. Singular politicians will make an immediate response but an organization always tries to come up with some kind of sanitized statement before saying something.
But here's a slight counter to that:Here, found something more concrete
![]()
DHS pushes back against claim federal agents detaining Portland protesters aren't identifying themselves
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pushed back Friday against a claim being amplified by liberal politicians and activists that federal agents who deployed to Portland to disperse protesters this week aren’t identifying themselves.www.foxnews.com
DHS isn't denying what they're doing. The only thing they're denying is that DHS officers are not identifying themselves when they roll up and arrest someone.
Well, on a really "I don't know how I feel about this" note, the likelihood for this is very low.Watching this video...
Eventually, someone is going to get killed over this. Anyone can buy that tactical looking gear (just pay attention to some of those "Open our state back up" Protests and I can guarantee there are a number of protesters who look EXACTLY like those two). Just grabbing citizens off the street and bringing them to a unmarked van, eventually they're going to try to grab the wrong citizen who is armed and opens fire.
Oh please, don't try to put words in my mouth because you have no idea what you are talking about. You and Gorfias just tend to have your own weird conspiracy world just on difference sides of the fence, you would make a great odd couple.Your stance is people shouldn't defend themselves from individuals visually indistinct from armed white supremacists, who aren't identifying themselves and have no visual signifiers as to who they are except for a generic "police" patch literally anyone could purchase and wear, disappearing people into the back of unmarked civilian vehicles?
Just as with the use of chemical weapons against protesters, were this an armed conflict between nation-states it would be a violation of international law -- a notably vile one, as this voids rules of engagement and prisoner-of-war status for captured combatants.
Paywall so I can't read it but by that headline alone, it sounds like they were doing this, they just weren't trained on how to do it right (with basic police stuff like reading rights and identifying yourself, although I would think that any police agency wouldn't need to be trained on such basic things). Even from the headline, it's clear Federal agents were doing things in the area.But here's a slight counter to that:
![]()
Federal Officers Deployed in Portland Didn’t Have Proper Training, D.H.S. Memo Said (Published 2020)
Rather than tamping down persistent protests in Portland, Ore., a militarized presence from federal officers seems to have re-energized them.www.nytimes.com
I wasn't saying that White Supremacist groups or whatnot were doing this. Just that if you're a random citizen walking along the street and guys with guns in tactical gear appear and try to force you into a unmarked van while not being willing to talk or identify themselves, that random citizen might deem this as dangerous and a kidnapping and react accordingly. You have no idea who these men are and the only reason you might think they're legit is they have a POLICE stencil on their chest but anyone could sew a POLICE stencil to their chest. This random citizen might be armed and if you're of the mind that armed men are trying to kidnap you, that seems like the time to use your weapon as in your mind, if these people were legit, they'd be identifying themselves and showing proper identification.Well, on a really "I don't know how I feel about this" note, the likelihood for this is very low.
This would mean there would have to be some overlap with those people who were marching on their state governments with their AR-15s and those who support BLM.
I'm always open to being shocked, but I'm not holding my breath over that chance.
That is certainly far better information than I was seeing, thank you.Here, found something more concrete
![]()
DHS pushes back against claim federal agents detaining Portland protesters aren't identifying themselves
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) pushed back Friday against a claim being amplified by liberal politicians and activists that federal agents who deployed to Portland to disperse protesters this week aren’t identifying themselves.www.foxnews.com
DHS isn't denying what they're doing. The only thing they're denying is that DHS officers are not identifying themselves when they roll up and arrest someone.
Oregon has concealed carry laws and is generally one of the most permissive states regarding gun laws in the country. The protesters aren’t openly carrying guns or using them in self-defense because if they did the cops would kill them and dozens of others.Counterpoint, notice this only seems to be happening in states with restrictive carry laws and weak stand-your-ground/castle doctrine provisions, and against groups hostile to policing but simultaneously generally anti-gun. I strongly doubt feds would be as willing to cruise around in unmarked non-standard vehicles, looking for people to pluck off the streets without proper identification, probable cause, or due process, in states where people can (and probably would) legally open fire in self defense. Note when CBP/ICE pulls this shit in "if somebody attacks you feel free to blow their ass away" states, they roll in clearly identified and licensed agency vehicles, wear uniforms that clearly signify both agency and law enforcement status, and have their badges/identification on outermost layer.
As far as I can tell this series of decisions has been made with one distinct purpose: to make it impossible for people to tell the difference between law enforcement and violent right-wing extremists.
There was a similar case where a guy was yelling his name to reporters and his face was covered in blood so unlikely.One theory I read was that this event was an extraction of an undercover agent, with the reasoning being that:
- the guy was very calm about the whole thing
- No words were exchanged. No yelling of "POLICE, or STOP, or HANDS BEHIND YOUR HEAD" or any of the usual things police yell when they arrest somebody
- No handcuffs or restraints were used
- No marked cars
On the contrary, they're usually pretty quick, because they like to get a message out there ASAP (whether it's true or not is less important) - media image is extremely important. The government has plenty of media experts and strategists for this sort of purpose.Government organizations are very slow to respond to these sorts of things.