Ah yes, the extreme leftist, Kamala Harris and Biden-Meinhof.Who says they're mutually exclusive?
Ah yes, the extreme leftist, Kamala Harris and Biden-Meinhof.Who says they're mutually exclusive?
If Kamala Harris and Biden are extreme leftist and "communist" in quotations because people have killed that word to the point of nazi is doesn't mean anything apparently.Ah yes, the extreme leftist, Kamala Harris and Biden-Meinhof.
Because neither of them are Marxist?Who says they're mutually exclusive?
Their rhetoric is a sham but it still gives a shield under which actual marxists grow stronger.Ah yes, the extreme leftist, Kamala Harris and Biden-Meinhof.
I happily embrace new modalities, philosophies, and legal constructs, thank you very much. Like for instance if and when the ultra-wealthy enter international waters in stupid mega-yachts, if those yachts happen to get droned, well hey, the US no longer considers territoriality, citizenship status, proportionality, or due process particularly relevant in the execution of criminal justice does it? I consider it more an equal protection issue than anything, really.Their rhetoric is a sham but it still gives a shield under which actual marxists grow stronger.
It goes back to Silvanus and Escaraxe's debate. Escaraxe is a traditionalist when it comes to socialism, while Silvanus is an opportunist. The opportunity is the Democratic party flirting with socialists.
I can respect you for holding true to your philosophy. A lot of your fellow socialists on the forums appear to me to be going down the path of exchanging the wealthy 1% for the "enlightened" 1%.I happily embrace new modalities, philosophies, and legal constructs, thank you very much. Like for instance if and when the ultra-wealthy enter international waters in stupid mega-yachts, if those yachts happen to get droned, well hey, the US no longer considers territoriality, citizenship status, proportionality, or due process particularly relevant in the execution of criminal justice does it? I consider it more an equal protection issue than anything, really.
88 IQ enlightened master raceI can respect you for holding true to your philosophy. A lot of your fellow socialists on the forums appear to me to be going down the path of exchanging the wealthy 1% for the "enlightened" 1%.
Big props. Ever since Occupy Wallstreet got swatted down like a fly, racial 'tensions' had been shoved down the collective throats of the western world. Those criminals should have never been given bailouts.I happily embrace new modalities, philosophies, and legal constructs, thank you very much. Like for instance if and when the ultra-wealthy enter international waters in stupid mega-yachts, if those yachts happen to get droned, well hey, the US no longer considers territoriality, citizenship status, proportionality, or due process particularly relevant in the execution of criminal justice does it? I consider it more an equal protection issue than anything, really.
If anyone vaguely associated with those responsible for about 3,000 deaths and $40 billion in economic damage in 2001 can and will be droned with extreme prejudice and without remorse or legal oversight, people knowingly and directly responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands per year and trillions in economic damage should be too, right?
If "Marxists" grow stronger from the mere mention of income inequality and public healthcare, then there must be something very appealing about Marxism.Their rhetoric is a sham but it still gives a shield under which actual marxists grow stronger.
It's appealing to be unemployed and get stimulus checks.If "Marxists" grow stronger from the mere mention of income inequality and public healthcare, then there must be something very appealing about Marxism.
It's appealing to hit that 'Reply' button without putting a modicum of research or thought into one's response.It's appealing to be unemployed and get stimulus checks.
It’s appealing to suck dick.It's appealing to hit that 'Reply' button without putting a modicum of research or thought into one's response.
At this point I'm just jacking up your likes by letting you get "gotcha" moments your fanboys will slobber over. You could have made a profession out of this nonsense had you been born in the right time, in the right place, but alas the party is over and the experiment had failed. Replying to our conversation from earlier, oh how so very personal of you to tell me how you'd pay in the restaurant you visit in Mallorca. Absolute state of commies, you can't even connect marxist theory to reality, which is why you can't even understand why I'm asking you these questions. What worth is your materialist philosophy if you don't follow it yourself, and refuse to defend your actions.It's appealing to hit that 'Reply' button without putting a modicum of research or thought into one's response.
that's kinda gay, though.It’s appealing to suck dick.
Edit: I do mean this as literally as possible btw
Next thing you're gonna say is "I was only pretending to be retarded!"At this point I'm just jacking up your likes by letting you get "gotcha" moments your fanboys will slobber over.
It's not nice to call me retarded. Is this the low level of this forum?Next thing you're gonna say is "I was only pretending to be retarded!"
I just felt like coming down to your level. I won't stick around for you to beat me with experience, though.It's not nice to call me retarded. Is this the low level of this forum?
insult, slander, feign superiority and run away. I bet you'll get many up-votes for that. Good job.I just felt like coming down to your level. I won't stick around for you to beat me with experience, though.
You seem very concerned about other people's popularity.insult, slander, feign superiority and run away. I bet you'll get many up-votes for that. Good job.
Do people on the forum in general seem more concerned about an argument getting likes than having a solid argument? This isn't the only time I've seen someone complain about how many upvotes they're getting compared to the person they're arguing againstYou seem very concerned about other people's popularity.