Didn't like 85 from the youth camp die in that attack or were the rest adults?Well, not too long ago in Norway a racist just got up one morning and decided to shoot 50 children. Your average racist is a violent and primitive person. Burning books is among the more benign things he could have done. Not that they don't have a history of doing that, too.
Legally speaking there isn't. That's the double-edge sword of free speech. Anyone can call for peace and love, and anyone else can call them a pussy fag damned to hell. That's just the way of things.Pretty much my thoughts. There's a difference between free speech and just being an asshole.
The only things I grabbed when my apartment building was on fire was my cats, my photo album, my purse and my computer. But that was all I could grab before I had to sit in my neighbors boat across from my apartment in the parkinglot and watch a waterfall coming out of the apartment directly above mine knowing everything in my place was now under water. The fire department was really bad ass though. They took all my stuff and threw it on my couch and tarped it B4 they flooded me, they did the same in the bedroom putting everything on my bed. The furniture was lost but at least they saved all my collectibles and games <3. I brought them food a couple of weeks later to thank them. There is a reason why girls are crazy about firemen. XDMost of what I hold dear is people, who are tangible and ephemeral. So yes, I would object with over the top violence if someone tried to set them on fire. If someone tries to set fire to a copy of a book I like I'm just going to roll my eyes and call them an idiot.
As for sacred personages, well, here's my Holy Trinity
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Father, The Son, and The Holy Spirit
None of them would approve with rioting because of the burning of a text by a moron who's only goal is to upset me. They would be most disappointed with me indeed.
no worries, I have trouble doing that too when I try to switch between Hopi, English, French and Spanish. Words and grammar start getting all screwed up because they don't mean the same thing. If I get off the phone from talking to my family then try to speak or write it comes out all weird because my brain won't switch. haha!If that's a Swede, I'm Russian. The Swedish that person writes is grammatically wrong in ways Swedes wouldn't do wrong. That along with some of the more questionable word choices makes it obvious that the person is an actual Russian troll, which is no doubt why they say that their detractors will say that is what they are.
Some choice examples:
"Jag tänkte liknande, gör det fortfarande, men mina erfarenheter har trubbat mig och jag vill bara se till att något förändras, vad som helst " I used to think similar, I still do, but my experiences have dulled me and I just want to make sure something change, anything.
There are several things wrong with this sentence. "Jag tänkte liknande" is correct in a grammatical sense, but the word a native Swede would use would be likadant. Liknande is similar and likadant is alike or the same. Small mistake, but telling. A Swede would also use the word och (and) instead of a coma (Jag tänkte liknande och gör det fortfarande), Swedish is generally very sparse with commas and very rarely use them for interjections like that. Then we get the word "trubbat" which derives from trubbig (blunt/dull), the correct use in Sweden is avtrubbat and trubbat is not even a word. Lastly, the final part of the sentence, "se till att något förändras, vad som helst" is weird since the addition of vad som helst at the end makes for poor Swedish grammar and is inconsistent with Swedish language melody. Secondly, se till att något förändras is a declaration of intent, whereas the person (having supposedly fled Sweden) should hav used "Jag vill se något ändras", I want to see something change. That's still bad Swedish, as more natural Swedish would be "jag hoppas att något ändras" eller "något måste förändras", I hope something changes/ something has to change.
"Jag flyttade från Sverige efter studierna till ett forna Sovjet land, levnadskostnaden är högre här men livet så mycket mer flottigt och njutbar " I moved to Sweden after the studies to a former Soviet country, the cost of living is higher here but the life so much more greasy and enjoyable.
Once again, the first part is technically correct but the flow of the sentence is wrong in a way that non-native speakers often do. After the studies I moved from Sweden to a Eastern European country is much better Swedish. The important part is that we would lead with "after the studies" and if we led with "I moved" it would be like "I moved to a former Soviet country after my studies". The word forna is also weirdly archaic in this sentence and should be replaced with tidigare (earlier/former). Lastly, Swedes very rarely use former Soviet country to describe the old East Bloc. We say Eastern Europe.
Moving on to the second part, there's no chance that the cost of living is higher in any Eastern European country then it is in Stockholm. Secondly, njutbar is bent wrong and should be njutbart and even that is wrong in context and should be njutningsfullt. Flottigt means greasy and is not a descriptive a Swede would ever make of their life.
" Det tog en lång tid för mig att inte bli rädd av människor i mörkret " It took a long time for me not to be afraid of people in the dark. Technically a correct sentence (seeing the trend here?) but not something a Sweden would write or say. A Swede would phrase this as "Det tog lång tid innan jag slutade vara rädd för människor jag möte på natten", it took a long time for me to stop being afraid of people I met in the night. "Att inte bli rädd", to not be afraid, is terrible Swedish and we don't refer to the darkness after sunset as dark, but as night.
I mean, that and the whole insane level of exaggeration in that post makes it clear that that's not a Swede. If you want to know more about Sweden from a local, just AMA. I'm right here.
EDIT: Damn, reading this post again my English is atrocious. I am obviously not able to shift between both languages at will...
Maybe he meant to say that he moved TO Sweden FROM a former Soviet country (instead of using "to" both times) which would explain A) His errors with the language, B) the cost of living, C) His use of "former Soviet country" instead of "Eastern Europe""Jag flyttade från Sverige efter studierna till ett forna Sovjet land, levnadskostnaden är högre här men livet så mycket mer flottigt och njutbar " I moved to Sweden after the studies to a former Soviet country, the cost of living is higher here but the life so much more greasy and enjoyable.
I've heard a lot about violence and crimes committed by migrants in European countries. What's been your experience on your country? Not necessarily your personal experience, just, what do you see on the news and what do you hear about? Is there a lot of violence? A little? Bombings? Rape?If you want to know more about Sweden from a local, just AMA. I'm right here.
I've luckily never had to deal with extremists. I mean, my mom made us go to church every sunday till we were twelve, but that's about as extreme as it got in my household. And every interaction I've had with people of the Islamic faith was always very respectful from their side (and from mine obviously). But that doesn't change that I'm just really not a fan of some of these practices.Yea, I have pretty much had to deal with Christian extremists my entire life so I understand all too well how any religious extremist can be a nightmare. However, the only thing this does is make people feel disrespected and cut off from society, even when they are not extremists. I try to show people respect because that is the only way I can expect respect in return.
I do not really like any religion and view them as a means to manipulate and control people rather than actually helping them. I don't think that we are helping them understand that though by just treating them badly, so I do not see the point in such gestures as burning their texts. It reminds me of the church burning harry potter books and acting like they were " burning witches" in Salem. MADNESS.
EDIT: *If anyone has a photo of when they tied harry potter books to stakes and were burning them like witches pls post here* I can't seem to find it anymore.
See that is a fine line though due to the fighting words doctrine even in the US. The courts ruled that calling a woman a hussy and a whore was not free speech. Depending on the judge you get it goes back and forth. Honestly though they should just deem behaving that way as fighting words and be done with it because if you are saying something that you deserve to be punched in the nose for then no it should not be legal. Due to too much politicization of the courts though they allowed more than they ever should have. Screaming racial slurrs at people is no more productive than screaming fire in a theatre or in an airport and only serves to incite violence.Legally speaking there isn't. That's the double-edge sword of free speech. Anyone can call for peace and love, and anyone else can call them a pussy fag damned to hell. That's just the way of things.
Now this is Europe we're talking about, so I'm sure there are laws, because they don't really have freedom of speech, at least not in the way an American would be familiar with.
Look as much as I find it distasteful to burn any holy book, its their property. If they bought a Quran to use it for kindling for a camping trip, that's their right. Its their property. And I would be very very VERY hesitant to open the can of worms that is letting any group, religious, secular, political or otherwise being able to control someone's property rights, based off what they as a group find offensive.
It's fine, I sometimes talk to myself too, I'm also known to talk with food.Damn, just quoted m'self. Oops.
Heck, I was talking to a thumbnail just now.It's fine, I sometimes talk to myself too, I'm also known to talk with food.
But what defines fighting words?See that is a fine line though due to the fighting words doctrine even in the US. The courts ruled that calling a woman a hussy and a whore was not free speech. Depending on the judge you get it goes back and forth. Honestly though they should just deem behaving that way as fighting words and be done with it because if you are saying something that you deserve to be punched in the nose for then no it should not be legal. Due to too much politicization of the courts though they allowed more than they ever should have. Screaming racial slurrs at people is no more productive than screaming fire in a theatre or in an airport and only serves to incite violence.
Well be careful with those, thumbnails are known for being duplicitous.Heck, I was talking to a thumbnail just now.
The Romani people engage in flying planes into skyscrapers then??? You think the reason is just racism right after talking about something the other groups you listed haven't done???The attitude towards muslims in the west has gotten worse and worse ever since the terrorist attacks of 9/11. That being said, if it weren't muslism, it'd be Romani People or Eastern Europeans or Southern Europeans or any other easy target. There's simply a lack of solidarity among people, in many cases one that expresses itself as outright hostility. There is a deep sickness in our society. There is a cure and that cure is Socialism, Antifascism, Internationalism. Things can't go on like this.
Was tempted to bring this up myself but I don't know Iron well enough yet to really know what their beliefs are.That's a well executed bait, Iron. Congrats.
What sweet nothings do you whisper into the burrito before you eat it?It's fine, I sometimes talk to myself too, I'm also known to talk with food.