You made this statement below debunking you're initial premiseIt isn't though. It isn't 3 times deadlier than the flu. It was only deadlier than the flu when we knew nothing about it.
If more people die from it, it's more deadly. It can be via being contagious or having a higher mortality rate per infected individualThe mortality rate is plummeting even before a vaccine. It's not exceptionally deadly: it's exceptionally contagious, and nobody had ever had it before. But it is, in the long term, going to be less deadly than the flu.
Let me repeat. It has killed 3x times the amount people as the normal flu. In six months. Under some restrictions. It's legit way more deadly. The flu has a higher mortality rate but is less deadly
But anyway. So apparently shelter in place is a bad thing, by your statement that I initially quoted. How many people would have to die for shelter place to be an acceptable response. 1 mil? 10 mil? Or is it just a bad premise?