Cops have always existed in one form or another. They just went by different names.No I am not. Once we could not imagine a world without slaves, now we cannot imagine a world without cops. Both are possible and exist/have existed.
Cops have always existed in one form or another. They just went by different names.No I am not. Once we could not imagine a world without slaves, now we cannot imagine a world without cops. Both are possible and exist/have existed.
I was unaware where I was saying other people should be allowed to murder or beat their wives because cops do. I think we should come up with systems that actually reduce crime without emboldening the wife beaters of society.Two wrongs don't make a right. I thought we all learned this in preschool.
No.Cops have always existed in one form or another. They just went by different names.
And how are those communities doing?There are communities without cops right now and communities without the protection of cops in America as we speak who must experience that to perpetuate cops.
Well the cops keep fucking them over.And how are those communities doing?
If you think it's a bad argument explain why. So far all you've said is "it's bad, it's absurd"I know what analogies are. I also know when they completely fall flat on their faces as arguments. Maybe you should tell Revnak to work on his debating skills instead of getting mad at me for pointing out how absurd he is.
You're completely ignorant that is where your proposed solution will end.I was unaware where I was saying other people should be allowed to murder or beat their wives because cops do.
That's what people here are suggesting. Not all of us are so naive we think it will happen without licensed law enforcement.I think we should come up with systems that actually reduce crime without emboldening the wife beaters of society.
So in other words, without anyone to actually protect them, they're screwed. Newsflash, getting rid of cops won't make their problems go away. You'll just leave them open to be abused by others.Well the cops keep fucking them over.
I have explained why I think it's bad. Others in this thread have explained why they disagree with Revnak.If you think it's a bad argument explain why. So far all you've said is "it's bad, it's absurd"
Licensed “law enforcement” doesn’t have to be cops. Armed dudes with arresting and murder powers. In our infinite imaginations we can in fact come up with a system where the guy who writes speeding tickets cannot shoot you for “acting aggressively.”You're completely ignorant that is where your proposed solution will end.
That's what people here are suggesting. Not all of us are so naive we think it will happen without licensed law enforcement.
He doesn't, we've discussed this with him before, I'll address your points tomorrow, I don't feel like bickering on the Internet todayI have explained why I think it's bad. Others in this thread have explained why they disagree with Revnak.
Here's where you explain why you agree with Revnak.
He doesn’t he just realizes you suck at arguing.I have explained why I think it's bad. Others in this thread have explained why they disagree with Revnak.
Here's where you explain why you agree with Revnak.
No, in context, so that some can have the “protection” of cops others must suffer the occupation of cops.So in other words, without anyone to actually protect them, they're screwed. Newsflash, getting rid of cops won't make their problems go away. You'll just leave them open to be abused by others.
What you're talking about is what people in favor of police reform want. It does not require getting rid of cops.Licensed “law enforcement” doesn’t have to be cops. Armed dudes with arresting and murder powers. In our infinite imaginations we can in fact come up with a system where the guy who writes speeding tickets cannot shoot you for “acting aggressively.”
Yes it fucking does. Unless we completely get rid of the existing organizations across the entire country they will just rebuild the exact same shit we’ve already got. The police unions, their lawyers, the capitalists, all of them will fight you every step of the way toward a system of cops that no longer resembles cops, because they like cops. They prefer having cops. And your reforms are reliant on them changing their minds about that.What you're talking about is what people in favor of police reform want. It does not require getting rid of cops.
Well Hawki lives in Australia. So this isn't a threat. You have to actively look like your trying to kill someone before guns can be taken out.I hope when you're shot to pieces by the cops you like so much, you remember this moment.
On average, about four people are killed by police in Australia per year. That's compared to the >1000 car crash fatalities per year. The chances of me being killed by police are so remote, it barely rates a mention.I hope when you're shot to pieces by the cops you like so much, you remember this moment.
The kind of planet where one of the safest parts of Mexico has no cops.On average, about four people are killed by police in Australia per year. That's compared to the >1000 car crash fatalities per year. The chances of me being killed by police are so remote, it barely rates a mention.
Also, I don't "love" cops, but I appreciate the need for them. Cops are the people who've issued me and people I know tickets. They're also the people I've had to call in to protect others. The police aren't some magical organization that's completely without vice (no organization is), or without room for improvement (again, no organization is - I'd love to see their response time increased), but when I see people calling for their complete abolition, well, sometimes I have to wonder what planet we're on.
“Well ok, but nevertheless...”The kind of planet where one of the safest parts of Mexico has no cops.
What a load of Horse Manure. We already know what happens when you don't have cops. Rape, robbery and murder skyrocketed on the reservations since the 1970's ruling not allowing tribes to prosecute non tribal members. Yes, they exist and it sucks. Who exactly, pray tell is going to stop the oath keepers or proud boys when we have no cops? Who is going to stop all the current police from forming their own gangs and doing what they want anyways? What do you think the current cops are going to do when you take away their official roles?No I am not. Once we could not imagine a world without slaves, now we cannot imagine a world without cops. Both are possible and exist/have existed.
The only places that can get away with that are places no one cares about. If the cartels, gangs or government started caring about those regions, everything goes to shit fairly quickly. We do not all live in an isolated bubble here. Even in rural places like on reservations, the people are tormented by gangs coming through due to the lack of local law enforcement. Saying this is viable at all is ignorant of the actual cause and effect of each situation here.The kind of planet where one of the safest parts of Mexico has no cops.