ATT building in Nashville bombed
- Thread starter crimson5pheonix
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Oh if we're going for wild speculation can I throw in the crazy tin foil hat idea that it's because Wonder Woman 1984 was bad?
Sounds about right. I'm glad know was hurt or killed, but I would expect Comcast to get something like this after all of the shit they've pulled. AT & T ain't squeaky clean, but have better cable service at the time. I would not know, because most people I know either have Comcast or Dish Network.
He was with antifa!!! Points to those who will get my inside joke of a certain someone who used to be here.
I think everyone is still watching Capitol Hill’s credibility slowly implode. And since this was just an super elaborate suicide - though it could easily have turned to murder-suicide - does it count as terrorism?
I think they called the dude who got shot vandalizing ICE vans a terrorist so yeah.
Is the dude vandalizing ICE vans breaking the law and using fear as a tool to push political change? If so, terrorist.
Was this bomb meant to inspire political change? It not, not a terrorist.
Terrorism has nothing to do with the scale of the crime, it's about the intent.
For what, O judges, is more full of labour than we both are, what can be either expressed or imagined more full of anxiety and uneasiness than we are, who being induced to devote ourselves to the republic by the hope of the most honourable rewards, yet cannot be free from the fear of the most cruel punishments? I have always thought indeed that Milo had to encounter the other storms and tempests in these billows of the assemblies because he always espoused the cause of the good against the bad; but in a court of justice, and in that council in which the most honourable men of all ranks are sitting as judges, I never imagined that Milo's enemies could have any hope of diminishing his glory by the aid of such men, much less of at all injuring his safety.
Have you considered for a moment that you're effectively considering "terrorism" as a measure of the degree of a crime, as though any sufficiently egregious crime counts as terrorism and any sufficiently insignificant crime should not count as terrorism. You're using the word terrorism as a morality scale.
Now consider what sort of response you would have to someone else using the word in that way. I think you would have a low opinion of someone who considers evil and violent political dissidence as synonymous, would you not? Are you not gleefully perpetuating standards you would protest given a moment's thought?