Police seize firearms from Black men at Virginia rally for gun rights

Recommended Videos

ObsidianJones

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 29, 2020
1,118
1,442
118
Country
United States

Police stopped a car of Black men and confiscated two of their guns at Virginia’s annual “Lobby Day” on Monday while white gun rights activists defied local laws unimpeded in the state capital of Richmond.

In a day with racial tensions on display, Black protesters denounced what they called a double standard in a state where people are free to openly carry firearms.


Virginians converge on the capitol each Lobby Day to petition state legislators on issues of public interest, but the day has been dominated by gun rights activists in recent years. It coincides with Martin Luther King Jr. Day, which honors the slain civil rights hero
They were stopped one block from Richmond’s memorial to Confederate General Robert E. Lee, less than an hour after a white, anti-government “boogaloo” leader boasted on a megaphone that his group was violating gun and ammunition laws.

One of the Black men to have handguns confiscated unleashed an expletive-laden complaint, calling it a double-standard and an example of why many Black Americans resent the police.

“Everybody in the city is carrying today, and you’re only pulling us over,” yelled a Black woman who was looking on with a group of enraged bystanders. “Shoutout to Martin Luther King Day!”

Richmond police did not immediately respond to a Reuters query about the incident and about the protesters’ allegation of discrimination. On Twitter, police said they had issued a summons to one man at that scene for possessing a concealed firearm without a permit, and had confiscated the gun.
About an hour before the Black men were pulled over, boogaloo leader Mike Dunn hoisted a megaphone alongside about 10 members of his “Last Sons of Liberty” group, all white men.

Dunn told the assembled reporters and police that his group was openly carrying semiautomatic rifles “in pure defiance” of local laws, and “rocking mags (ammunition magazines) with double the legal limit.”

Dunn confirmed to Reuters that his group faced no police blowback.

City law allows police to ban openly carrying guns at large public events, but they did not intervene against most gun owners on Monday.

“Virginia is and remains an open carry state,” Richmond police said in a statement.

The demonstrators, including boogaloos sporting their trademark Hawaiian shirts, Proud Boys, and about 20 members of two Black self-defense groups were outnumbered by reporters.

Despite being united in their support for gun rights, racial tensions were visible.

Members of the Black Lives Matter 757 and Original Black Panthers of VA were talking to reporters near the Richmond statehouse when a group of Proud Boys walked by flashing the “OK” hand gesture commonly used as a white power sign.
And the wheel keeps spinning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Revnak

XsjadoBlayde

~ just another dread messenger & artisanal kunt ~
Apr 29, 2020
3,702
3,824
118
Well ain't that a whole bag of discriminatory funsies. Can't quite shake those age-old kkk infections, evidently. Sorry, "infection" implies contamination from exterior influences. "Hereditary cancer" would be more appropriate.
 

happyninja42

Elite Member
Legacy
May 13, 2010
8,577
2,990
118
Can't quite shake those age-old kkk infections, evidently.
That's assuming they want to shake it off anyway. And I feel safe in saying that most police precincts are not trying to channel their inner Taylor Swift when it comes to racial inequality. They are 100% on board with it, and try and enforce it at every opportunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: XsjadoBlayde

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
Yeah, against the people who terrorize their communities every day.
"It's okay when WE do it because we're justified! They weren't!"
Tale as old as time
Song as old as rhyme...
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
"It's okay when WE do it because we're justified! They weren't!"
Tale as old as time
Song as old as rhyme...
My condemnation was always of the intent to kill politicians and take hostages. If we’re going to call vandalism and the destruction of property terrorism then I see no issue with supporting it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Seanchaidh

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
My condemnation was always of the intent to kill politicians and take hostages. If we’re going to call vandalism and the destruction of property terrorism then I see no issue with supporting it.
You called it terrorism when you agreed with me that it was terrorism by saying
"Yeah, against the people who terrorize their communities every day"

So don't try to weasel out of it by saying "YOU call it terrorism, I call it [some other crime that sounds slightly better]"
 

Revnak

We must imagine Sisyphus horny
Legacy
May 25, 2020
2,944
3,099
118
Country
USA
You called it terrorism when you agreed with me that it was terrorism by saying
"Yeah, against the people who terrorize their communities every day"
Because I know how meaningless the word terrorism is in American parlance. I take it much more seriously and have a particular definition, but I don’t care to play empty semantics with you.
 

Houseman

Mad Hatter Meme Machine.
Legacy
Apr 4, 2020
3,910
760
118
Because I know how meaningless the word terrorism is in American parlance. I take it much more seriously and have a particular definition, but I don’t care to play empty semantics with you.
Oh, okay, you were just intentionally dumbing down your vocabulary in order to effectively communicate with Americans. You didn't just totally agree with me. Yes, that's much more plausible than recognizing that you have a double standard.
 

Seanchaidh

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 21, 2009
6,132
3,706
118
Country
United States of America
Oh, okay, you were just intentionally dumbing down your vocabulary in order to effectively communicate with Americans. You didn't just totally agree with me. Yes, that's much more plausible than recognizing that you have a double standard.
Condemning something that is X is not the same as condemning something because it is X.