Recent content by jason27131

Meh. Why bother to convince anyone when the majority of people agree judging by bioware's website polls, and the minority that does disagree won't agree in the first place.

I don't give a shit that it's a sad ending. I like them as well. The way it was implemented sucked. Here's how plots work. Normally there is a conflict, the hero tries to solve this conflict, there exists a climax, then the calming down after the climax. That is the definition of a plot...

Na. It's more like I realized no matter how many arguments everyone brings up, you simply ignore them, so I simply gave up on trying to convince you of otherwise. Everyone else hates the way the ending works, you don't. You won't change your mind, but you really can't change our mind either...

I find it extremely funny that you're the only one in this thread that is defending the ending. No one else is. So, here are my thoughts: 1. You're either the most intelligent person that exists on earth, being able to see the deeper meaning of the ending, and see what everyone else can't...

Biggest plothole. Reapers wipe out advance races so synthetics won't destroy them in the first place. Hello geth and EDI. Only reason Geth took the home planet is because the quarians decided to be a bunch of pricks and kill them for being sentient. Then the geth wanted peace, but the...

My question is: Why was he travelling through the mass relay in the first place? Isn't there a god damn battle going on?

Imagine the universe of star wars. Now re-imagine it without warp drives. Congrats, now you have the new world of mass effect. force = biotics

Well, You can't really compare shit with shit. In the end, they're the same :S

This. I didn't say EVERYONE. I said everyone who was able to fight. There's a difference. Sure in skirmishes and minor battles I wouldn't expect everyone. But if it comes down to a final battle where if you lose, you lose everything, hell yes you would commit everyone who can fight to fight...

So true. I'm actually not sure, but then again, who ever said the ME3 writers were remotely bright? Judging from the ending, they're obviously not. It would take a massive moron to NOT see the endings would piss off more than half the fans.

Sacking of Rome indeed did, and the spartan war indeed did commit all men to the war. Not from 300 btw, never saw that movie and never will. Not into the who "lets fuck up history" thing. 2. Literal acting? You're not acting anything. You're following a pre-determined speech. 3. Never...

1. Sacking of Rome had civilians fighting for their life because the military got owned. Same with Russian. War between Sparta and Persia had every spartan man fighting in the war, but women couldn't fight back then soo.... 2. "A role-playing game (RPG and sometimes roleplaying game) is a...

1. History has shown again and again that indeed this DID happen. The only one who apparently doesn't think so is you. The final battle doesn't need anyone to make things for the military. What it needs is as much ships as possible, and as many people to mann this as possible. What it doesn't...

The thing is tho, is that the ending of a series is suppose to bring closure, a sense of finality. I wanted things to settle down, like the talks liara and sheppard had, or the thoughts of tali building a home, etc. Instead it ended with more questions. That's what kinda annoyed me. If they...

Not argument there. Amazing game, just ended quite badly. As someone said before, a 5 course meal, then shit for desert.