Recent content by Perplexed

People have their hobbies and obsessions. I don't personally see anything wrong with it.

I suppose that may or may not have something to do with the number of games that are coming out these years compared to yesteryears, but all in all it'd be strange to say modern things falter in comparison to younger things. Perhaps they lack the depth that used to be put into games, perhaps...

I suppose that may or may not have something to do with the number of games that are coming out these years compared to yesteryears, but all in all it'd be strange to say modern things falter in comparison to younger things. Perhaps they lack the depth that used to be put into games, perhaps...

When someone thinks older games, I'd imagine they think about good older games. When someone things new games, it's likely they bunch together all the new games rather then pick and choosing as they did when they thought older games. I wonder how much interaction is actually required of me.

Well, the 'milking it' argument, or thought, usually comes from them re-using ridiculous amounts of material. That would be fine if they were just sequels, but how many times have the games followed the same story arcs? Zelda and Gannondwarf, or peach and browser. The weapons, items, battle...

Yes. Why? Sci-Fi Fantasy isn't that bad of a genre. Why else? Because they can milk the series more.

I find it difficult to blatently judge any anime without taking into consideration, what type of storyarc it has, what the setting is, what ages the anime is aimed at, and how old the anime is. An if anything, I'm pretty sure Naruto isn't aimed at adults.