If it was Vegas or Ibiza, 1000 in one minute I bet! I wondered the woods but only found a few drug dealers.kickyourass said:Is anyone else making a mental note of how long it takes before someone finds somebody naked in this picture?
Well it's not exactly something I need to go crying home to mommy about. So I was wrong? I've been wrong before and I'll probably be wrong again. ...many many many many times, I'm sure.scumofsociety said:We're still discussing it because you don't care so much that you have to make sure everyone knows it.canadamus_prime said:I believe several posts ago I said something along the lines of 'ok, but I still think it sounds silly" which was supposed to read as 'ok you're right, but I don't have to like it'
So the reason I have this "faux blase attitude" as you call it is because I don't get why we're still discussing this.
I know I'm a little late to join this conversation but using the very rarely used British measurement a billion is a million million so thousand million would be correct using that definition of billion.canadamus_prime said:Ok maybe, but "thousand million" sounds retarded or like something a little kid would say when making up some really big number.
Well I think we had a bit of a misunderstanding because I believed you were joking around when you said "you're crying inside, don't try and deny it." So my responding sarcasm was intended with the same jest. So I was rather surprised when this turned back into an argument.scumofsociety said:Absolutely, you see where a bit of politeness gets you compared to a dismissive attitude?canadamus_prime said:Well it's not exactly something I need to go crying home to mommy about. So I was wrong? I've been wrong before and I'll probably be wrong again. ...many many many many times, I'm sure.
And I don't need everyone to know it, just you. Now can we drop it please?
I only put it in there because it's hard to express sarcasm in text.scumofsociety said:I was joking in the sense that I didn't actually believe it, however the "/sarcasm" in your reply over egged the pudding a bit, so to speak.canadamus_prime said:Well I think we had a bit of a misunderstanding because I believed you were joking around when you said "you're crying inside, don't try and deny it." So my responding sarcasm was intended with the same jest. So I was rather surprised when this turned back into an argument.scumofsociety said:Absolutely, you see where a bit of politeness gets you compared to a dismissive attitude?canadamus_prime said:Well it's not exactly something I need to go crying home to mommy about. So I was wrong? I've been wrong before and I'll probably be wrong again. ...many many many many times, I'm sure.
And I don't need everyone to know it, just you. Now can we drop it please?
They custom built rigging for the setup, because at 800mm plus whatever the crop ratio is on the camera (unless it has a full frame sensor) even the slightest amount of wind will give it an unusable shake. Because of this custom rigging, they had automation in order to turn the rigging and take all of the pictures and make sure they were usable. If you really think you could do that with just a tripod head, then good luck. For how many pictures over how long they were shooting, any minor mistakes would ruin an entire section of the photograph for you. With this kind of precision, the corners you're talking about cutting would assuredly ruin many sections of footage.Mr.Tea said:-I already have the camera. But really, any decent DSLR will do.Wolfenbarg said:Unless you have the connections to get a sufficiently powerful camera, the super expensive telephoto lenses (they went up to 800mm), and build the robot plus the mounting, not to mention utilize the software I don't think you can say you could do it if you wanted to. Also, it may not be completely novel, but do you realize how big it is to go from publicly funded projects at a national park or federally funded projects in space to just some dude in Spain?
-Canon's EF 800mm f/5.6L is extremely expensive, but just renting it for a day or a weekend, not so much. And even then, it's not really needed. Zooming at 100% on this image tells a lot about what they probably used. i.e: I can tell they most certainly didn't use top grade equipment
-A robot?? Like I said, a sturdy tripod is paramount as is a tripod head with independent axises of movement, but that's it. You just need to be able to rotate and tilt a degree at a time. (We have them at school, tripod+head is like 200$-300$ which you already have if you're a photographer. And if you don't: rent!)
-Like I said, the software is what's impressive, and what I've never researched...
So yeah, if I found the software, I could definitely do it.
So yeah, I'm just one dude in Canada and there are thousands and thousands in the world like me and I'm not even a professional yet.
So yeah, like I said, it's an impressively assembly, but one of very ordinary pictures.