I'm lost. Are you trying to insinuate that someone shooting their parents for removing their video games could possibly be completely of sound mind?thaluikhain said:I usually hate the armchair psychologists cries of "he must have been crazy" shocking crimes tend to bring out, but if the "hearing in his head" bit is correct, and not mere hyperbole, then it would seem to be justified this time.
Yeah, reading IS hard. Thats probably why you skipped the word "properly" I put in there. Hold on, let me look that up for you:Desert Punk said:Reading comprehension are hardExcludos said:Was thinking the exact same thing. They knew he was ill, they had set up a surveillance system for him after all..and they couldn't be bothered to lock up their gun properly?! This is why US desperately needs stricter gun control.MeChaNiZ3D said:Anyone who tries to kill their own parents, where the parents are assumed to be regular, non-abusive people, is in need of psychiatric care regardless of videogames.
But you know what the elephant in the motherf***ing room is? HE SHOT THEM WITH A GUN HE HAD ACCESS TO.
AT 14.
In my opinion, all the blame videogames have been getting - ESPECIALLY in response to the massacre - has been a diversion strategy for the gun lobby. Because guns are sort of the logical place to look when this sort of thing occurs.
>Parents secure gunBrooks allegedly pried open his parents' gun safe and took out a .22 caliber pistol, according to iFiber One News. Brooks reportedly told police he then spent 90 minutes weighing whether or not to kill his mother and father.
>PARENTS CANT BE BOTHERED TO LOCK UP GUN! US NEEDS MOAR GUNZ CONTROL!
Seems more like someone needs to read articles more closely
No, just that that seems to be the default response whatever the circumstances.flarty said:I'm lost. Are you trying to insinuate that someone shooting their parents for removing their video games could possibly be completely of sound mind?thaluikhain said:I usually hate the armchair psychologists cries of "he must have been crazy" shocking crimes tend to bring out, but if the "hearing in his head" bit is correct, and not mere hyperbole, then it would seem to be justified this time.
Pried open is very dodgy, yeah. OTOH, I'd not be too surprised if he simply unlocked it. There's no foolproof way of ensuring people in your house don't get at the guns you keep there. They are going to find out where you keep the keys.Excludos said:No way a 14 year old would be able to pry open a PROPER gun safe. This is a complete lack of responsibility from the parents, and PROPER gun control would help that (IE: require training, require PROPER gun safes, hold the owner reliable for theft (even by their own kids) and what the guns are used for by the thief). In fact, in most countries, if one of the parents had died from this, the other parent would have been put up for indirect murder for failing to uphold proper gun standards.
That's because it's hard to assess how fucked up someone truly is. As an example we have a nuttbag whos trial is currently running (he killed infants in a daycare center) and it was revealed the parents did send him to therapy when he was a teen because they noticed something was wrong but unfortunately he didn't cooperate in therapy and as such the psychiatrist involved couldn't properly assess how messed up he was.CrazyGirl17 said:(facepalm) Why didn't this kid get help? Seriously, this seems like the kind of kid with serious freaking issues!
hahaha nice onerhizhim said:seems like he needs a prescription of high dose oral lead ...but then he probably heard that obama wants to take his guns away and he was like "nope, i'll keep them close. they should try to get them from my cold dead hands under my pillow."gmaverick019 said:yeah i'm thinking that's poor word placement...more like "lockbox"torno said:I can't help but notice that the article said the kid pried open his dad's gun safe.
Uh...
Assuming they aren't just substituting the word "unlocked" with something more spicy, someone with a gun safe, tell me: Exactly how easy is it to physically PRY open of these open?
a fucking safe uses the word "safe" for a reason...plasma cutters or some sort of bulldozer is needed to "pry" open a safe, unless this kid is solomon grundy
OT: kids a psychopath plain and simple, using video games as the scapegoat will get him off easy.
also, if they hooked up a damn surveillence system, you'd think the dad would have a thought along the lines of "hm..maybe i should keep my gun(s) in a guaranteed safe place that he can't get to them without me knowing"
in short: its all obamas fault!
thaluikhain said:I usually hate the armchair psychologists cries of "he must have been crazy" shocking crimes tend to bring out, but if the "hearing in his head" bit is correct, and not mere hyperbole, then it would seem to be justified this time.
Hearing voices itself isn't necessarily a sign of mental issues. It can be, but a lot of people who do hear voices don't have any other issues. (They tend to stay quiet about it, though, considering the stigma attached to it, or consider them religious experiences)CriticalMiss said:Anyway, this kid sounds like he has genuine mental problems if he is hearing voices in his head. Don't blame the games, blame the brain. The only time I have heard voices in my head whilst playing violent games is when I had the Xbox Live headset on.
I'd consider being psychotic (=losing contact with reality, hallucinations, delusions etc. not the same thing as being a psychopath) as grounds for pleading insanity.thaluikhain said:Not necessarily insane. Decidely psychotic though and clearly unsafe to be around normal people, but you can be a psychopath and be sane. The two are not mutually exclusive things.
I was saying that pleading insanity for a lighter sentence in such a situation should be immediately thrown out of the court.
Ok, but if those voices (assuming he had them) are telling him to kill people? Surely that is a sign that something has gone awry. And I wonder whether there is actually a way to reliably test for head voices other than simply asking a patient/subject and assuming they are being honest.Lieju said:Hearing voices itself isn't necessarily a sign of mental issues. It can be, but a lot of people who do hear voices don't have any other issues. (They tend to stay quiet about it, though, considering the stigma attached to it, or consider them religious experiences)
Whether he even did hear voices is uncertain, he might be just saying that, or it might be a figure of speech.
Indeed. Don't forget, the sponsor of that bill in California to criminalize selling M-rated games to minors was a Democrat [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leland_Yee].Stryc9 said:I'm sorry, you don't get to single Republicans out on this one. Let's not forget the past when Senators Lieberman (Democrat) and Hillary Clinton (Democrat) were BOTH trying to ram through videogame legislation in the wake of Columbine. This isn't something that can be blamed on one party or the other, BOTH parties are full of reactionary nitwits trying to pass bullshit legislation against videogames.
Is he even claiming that? From that article, it's not clear.CriticalMiss said:Ok, but if those voices (assuming he had them) are telling him to kill people? Surely that is a sign that something has gone awry. And I wonder whether there is actually a way to reliably test for head voices other than simply asking a patient/subject and assuming they are being honest.Lieju said:Hearing voices itself isn't necessarily a sign of mental issues. It can be, but a lot of people who do hear voices don't have any other issues. (They tend to stay quiet about it, though, considering the stigma attached to it, or consider them religious experiences)
Whether he even did hear voices is uncertain, he might be just saying that, or it might be a figure of speech.