1984 George Orwell

Recommended Videos

Ekonk

New member
Apr 21, 2009
3,120
0
0
I don't think it will happen. Information became to readily available with the internet. Remember that 1984 was written in 1948. It's science fiction from the past, which is always incorrect and definitely not happening now or anytime in the future.
 

tmujir955

New member
Oct 12, 2009
761
0
0
Crazzee said:
1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."

Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.
Did you read it before or after the year 1984? Reading it before 1984 adds a whole new layer of fear.
 

Acidwell

Beware of Snow Giraffes
Jun 13, 2009
980
0
0
Xanadu84 said:
1984 is probably my all time favorite book
You'd never guess with that avatar and all :)
OT:It could go either way and as far as it coming true i dont think it will come to the extremes in the book but certainly it is happening to some extent and always will in times of trouble.
This series of events sound familiar to anyone:
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger."
 

Travdelosmuertos

New member
Apr 16, 2009
228
0
0
Spectrum_Prez said:
1984 is certainly George Orwell's most influential and most important work, but I don't think it was his best work. I implore every single one of you guys and gals who like or didn't like 1984 to go out there and read his other works, especially Homage to Catalonia and Down and Out in London and Paris. The first recounts his time as a fighter with the Trotskyite Marxists in Spain alongside the libertarians and socialists against the fascists and the second is about a long period he spent as a bum/nearly homeless person in the two capitals. As well as being one of the most articulate portrayals of social injustice in modern societies, it's also quite a humorous read.

There's also the ironic (unverified) story of how American high school versions of Animal Farm included at the beginning his quote that every word he had ever written was against totalitarianism, but intentionally left out the part, "and in support of Democratic Socialism".
I agree with Homage to Catalonia. It's certainly one of his best. The first act of the book, where he describes the culture of the Spanish anarchists speaks to me as the perfect society. It's too bad that the moral of the story is that while some, if not most people are reasonable and can live a life of communal respect, that there is always an extremist who will ruin everyone's vision of a good life.

1984 is one of the most chilling books I've ever read. People here attack the pacing, but I think it's intentionally jarring. The whole point of the novel is to keep you in an uncomfortable position to give perspective of just how evil totalitarianism is. Everything is cold, desolate and hopeless. He throws these incredible scenes at you, like the two-minute hate. Everything is kind of slow up to that point, and you get a few pages of intensely descriptive writing that pulls you out of your comfort zone and then he throws you back into this hopeless, desolate world. I always found it to be genius.

On the topic of Animal Farm, I always found that while the story was woven much better, that it lacked the punch of 1984. They both approach the same subject from different angles. The message in Animal Farm wasn't nearly as intense and it didn't have the same immediacy. Seems more like the Grimm's fairy tale version of 1984.

I just started a sleeve dedicated to literary reference, mostly philosophy stuff, but I felt the need to dedicate a large portion to Orwell, as 1984 was one of the first books that got me into reading. I'm very excited about it.

You can see John Hurt as Winston Smith (the movie was the best reference we had to go off) and the chair from Room 101 soon there will be a smaller portrait of Julia and O'Brien with a few other small references. I also intend on having the portrat of Orwell (god damn he is an ugly one)in his service uniform during his time in Spain.
 

Queen Michael

has read 4,010 manga books
Jun 9, 2009
10,400
0
0
JemJar said:
Crazzee said:
1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."

Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.
I'm glad someone else said that first. Good luck out there, I'll be standing by with a bucket of cold water and some burn ointment just in case.
Thirded. Animal Farm had good characters and a plot that was actually interesting.
And I, too, really hate the way people say "Take a look at the USA; 1984 already happened!" Unless we're filmed in our own homes and no-one is allowed to critizise Prez Obama or they'll get imprisoned we have not reached a 1984 society.
 

AkJay

New member
Feb 22, 2009
3,555
0
0
I've never read the book, but i've heard enough hipster-liberal arts college idiots talkign about it to know what it's about.
 

TheDoctor455

Friendly Neighborhood Time Lord
Apr 1, 2009
12,257
0
0
(sigh)
Yes, 1984 is a great novel. But it was intended as a warning not bloody prophecy or a how-to manual for despotic cretins.
 

Femaref

New member
May 4, 2008
186
0
0
I read it about a month ago and had to hand in a summary/comment in school, so I just have to quote the first paragraph of the comment:

I really did enjoy reading the book, even if enjoy is probably the wrong word, but it fits the best. You
can not enjoy reading a book dealing with oppression, predominant surveillance and no freedom of
thought, it is a very weird and cruel joy to read this book.
 

BubbaJeff

New member
Dec 2, 2009
125
0
0
Glefistus said:
I think it is all summed up in the semi-comedic statement many make today in response to political news around the world: Orwell's "1984" was not supposed to be a guide.
Fiftheded.

(Yes, i know.)

One of my favourite books, and one of the most important and influential novels of all time; which is an exceptional boast for a book which is in essence, incredibly depressing to read. I would not recommend reading it and listening to something like Nine Inch Nails at the same time.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
The_ModeRazor said:
funguy2121 said:
The_ModeRazor said:
Of course there won't be soch a totalitarian bullshit. They would have to kill the internet and do a lot of other stuff that people wouldn't take kindly to. It would lead to civil war at the very least, but I honestly doubt such a government could be set up.
Please reference all documentation of the United States for the years 2001-2008. Key words: patriot act, FISA, extraordinary rendition, propaganda, pliable media.
I live in Hungary. USA is a long way from here.
Noone could set up a totalitarian government here ('cept if another country invades, e.g. USSR), because we don't give two shits. It's hard enough to make a living as it is.
Maybe not in your country, but it was happening here. The natural political pendelum swing saved us after 8 years but during that time, our government randomly spied on private citizens who had committed no crime, looking at private emails and phone calls. The 4 big cell phone companies handed over EVERYONE'S phone records. Resources that should have been spent going after child predators were instead spent spying on small political groups who had never spoken of or advocated terrorism or overthrowing the government. Innocent people with ties to terrorism that were innocuous at best, including some American citizens, were whisked away on concordes to nations that still practice mideval forms of torture, such as placing a detainee's hand in boiling water. The executive branch began to ink a billion+dollar deal with a large advertising firm to start a propaganda campaign until the press got wind of it. The CIA sent "liasons" to hollywood to "raise awareness and interest" in foreign espionage and military action. At least 2 reality shows were in the works. 24 and Spy Game were the only notable results. A war was started with a country that had no ties to the attacks on our own. We gave the UN, Geneva and the rest of the world the finger, and xenophobic, jingoistic paranoia was encouraged with Nazi-esque propaganda tactics and brand new phrases like "known unknowns and unknown knowns," "if you're not with us, you're with the terrorists," and "enemy combatants." Also, Dick Cheney shot a guy in the face.

Never trust a guy who looks like a Batman villain and shoots people in the face.
 

orangebandguy

Elite Member
Jan 9, 2009
3,117
0
41
Like Animal Farm I think it was ideas and philosophies that Orwell tried to put forward, not the likeliness such an event will ever happen.
 

Oh That Dude

New member
Nov 22, 2009
461
0
0
Edhed said:
Well lots of things DID come true in communist Russia like rewriting history and disappearing 'undesirables'. But Russian communism failed because of corruption and infighting in the high ranks and alcoholism in the population. I dont know enough about the current state of China but its looking close to that way too.
China isn't properly communist at all. It retained the convenient ability to repress the people, but it trades with the rest of the world, it's economically worlds away from communism.
 

SquirrelPants

New member
Dec 22, 2008
1,729
0
0
tmujir955 said:
Crazzee said:
1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."

Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.
Did you read it before or after the year 1984? Reading it before 1984 adds a whole new layer of fear.
I read Animal Farm first. Neither of them particularly scare me, though.
 

DracoSuave

New member
Jan 26, 2009
1,685
0
0
Queen Michael said:
What I don't get is: When some fact was changed, did the people really believe that the new, revised fact had always been true? Or did they just not care?
Ask yourself this question.

Why did the US invade Iraq?
 

'-_-

New member
Aug 10, 2009
97
0
0
Well I hope not and I think we will not unless we get overrun by commies or dictators or terrorists.
 

lazy_bum

New member
Mar 25, 2009
426
0
0
you're not writing an essay on this by ant chance are you? 0.o

Also it is possible to draw parralels, but then Orwell was very good at understanding the human psyche, i assume anyway from his books.
 

cheywoodward

New member
Dec 2, 2009
266
0
0
In the interests of full disclosure I have only really read half the book, it became quite depressing towards the end. I believe that Orwell was rather prescient in certain aspects of his portrayal of a dystopian future such as the amount of personal information the government has access to but that (hopefully) the difference is that there are well known laws regarding how and when the government can actually see said information.
 

tmujir955

New member
Oct 12, 2009
761
0
0
Crazzee said:
tmujir955 said:
Crazzee said:
1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."

Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.
Did you read it before or after the year 1984? Reading it before 1984 adds a whole new layer of fear.
I read Animal Farm first. Neither of them particularly scare me, though.
Hahaha, that's completely not what I meant. I asked if you read 1984 before the year 1984.