Did you read it before or after the year 1984? Reading it before 1984 adds a whole new layer of fear.Crazzee said:1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."
Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.
You'd never guess with that avatar and allXanadu84 said:1984 is probably my all time favorite book
I agree with Homage to Catalonia. It's certainly one of his best. The first act of the book, where he describes the culture of the Spanish anarchists speaks to me as the perfect society. It's too bad that the moral of the story is that while some, if not most people are reasonable and can live a life of communal respect, that there is always an extremist who will ruin everyone's vision of a good life.Spectrum_Prez said:1984 is certainly George Orwell's most influential and most important work, but I don't think it was his best work. I implore every single one of you guys and gals who like or didn't like 1984 to go out there and read his other works, especially Homage to Catalonia and Down and Out in London and Paris. The first recounts his time as a fighter with the Trotskyite Marxists in Spain alongside the libertarians and socialists against the fascists and the second is about a long period he spent as a bum/nearly homeless person in the two capitals. As well as being one of the most articulate portrayals of social injustice in modern societies, it's also quite a humorous read.
There's also the ironic (unverified) story of how American high school versions of Animal Farm included at the beginning his quote that every word he had ever written was against totalitarianism, but intentionally left out the part, "and in support of Democratic Socialism".
Thirded. Animal Farm had good characters and a plot that was actually interesting.JemJar said:I'm glad someone else said that first. Good luck out there, I'll be standing by with a bucket of cold water and some burn ointment just in case.Crazzee said:1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."
Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.
I really did enjoy reading the book, even if enjoy is probably the wrong word, but it fits the best. You
can not enjoy reading a book dealing with oppression, predominant surveillance and no freedom of
thought, it is a very weird and cruel joy to read this book.
Fiftheded.Glefistus said:I think it is all summed up in the semi-comedic statement many make today in response to political news around the world: Orwell's "1984" was not supposed to be a guide.
Maybe not in your country, but it was happening here. The natural political pendelum swing saved us after 8 years but during that time, our government randomly spied on private citizens who had committed no crime, looking at private emails and phone calls. The 4 big cell phone companies handed over EVERYONE'S phone records. Resources that should have been spent going after child predators were instead spent spying on small political groups who had never spoken of or advocated terrorism or overthrowing the government. Innocent people with ties to terrorism that were innocuous at best, including some American citizens, were whisked away on concordes to nations that still practice mideval forms of torture, such as placing a detainee's hand in boiling water. The executive branch began to ink a billion+dollar deal with a large advertising firm to start a propaganda campaign until the press got wind of it. The CIA sent "liasons" to hollywood to "raise awareness and interest" in foreign espionage and military action. At least 2 reality shows were in the works. 24 and Spy Game were the only notable results. A war was started with a country that had no ties to the attacks on our own. We gave the UN, Geneva and the rest of the world the finger, and xenophobic, jingoistic paranoia was encouraged with Nazi-esque propaganda tactics and brand new phrases like "known unknowns and unknown knowns," "if you're not with us, you're with the terrorists," and "enemy combatants." Also, Dick Cheney shot a guy in the face.The_ModeRazor said:I live in Hungary. USA is a long way from here.funguy2121 said:Please reference all documentation of the United States for the years 2001-2008. Key words: patriot act, FISA, extraordinary rendition, propaganda, pliable media.The_ModeRazor said:Of course there won't be soch a totalitarian bullshit. They would have to kill the internet and do a lot of other stuff that people wouldn't take kindly to. It would lead to civil war at the very least, but I honestly doubt such a government could be set up.
Noone could set up a totalitarian government here ('cept if another country invades, e.g. USSR), because we don't give two shits. It's hard enough to make a living as it is.
China isn't properly communist at all. It retained the convenient ability to repress the people, but it trades with the rest of the world, it's economically worlds away from communism.Edhed said:Well lots of things DID come true in communist Russia like rewriting history and disappearing 'undesirables'. But Russian communism failed because of corruption and infighting in the high ranks and alcoholism in the population. I dont know enough about the current state of China but its looking close to that way too.
I read Animal Farm first. Neither of them particularly scare me, though.tmujir955 said:Did you read it before or after the year 1984? Reading it before 1984 adds a whole new layer of fear.Crazzee said:1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."
Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.
Ask yourself this question.Queen Michael said:What I don't get is: When some fact was changed, did the people really believe that the new, revised fact had always been true? Or did they just not care?
Hahaha, that's completely not what I meant. I asked if you read 1984 before the year 1984.Crazzee said:I read Animal Farm first. Neither of them particularly scare me, though.tmujir955 said:Did you read it before or after the year 1984? Reading it before 1984 adds a whole new layer of fear.Crazzee said:1984 flows badly, has terrible pacing, and is very melodramatic about expressing its point. While I do agree that we shouldn't let governments get to that point, at the same time I hate it when people take that as definitive truth, "this is going to/has already happened."
Honestly, I prefer Animal Farm. It is a bit more lighthearted and is actually entertaining to read.